Channel
@razuvaevgmk
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
3,686subscribers
+7 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001220337711 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @razuvaevgmk |
| Created | 12 March 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/razuvaevgmk |
Real estate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 82% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 10:57 | 3,686 | +2 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 14:17 | 3,684 | -2 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 23:41 | 3,686 | -8 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 13:37 | 3,694 | +7 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 20:47 | 3,687 | +3 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 10:38 | 3,684 | -2 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 05:36 | 3,686 | -3 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 02:48 | 3,689 | -3 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 20:13 | 3,692 | +3 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 16:16 | 3,689 | +11 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 06:12 | 3,678 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:32 | 3,679 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:39 | 3,679 | first reading |
22 posts held, back to 17 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 22 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
302 reactions across 14 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 65 | 21.5% | |
| 🤣 | 61 | 20.2% | |
| ❤ | 58 | 19.2% | |
| 💯 | 39 | 12.9% | |
| 🔥 | 31 | 10.3% | |
| 👍 | 30 | 9.93% | |
| 💔 | 6 | 1.99% | |
| 👌 | 4 | 1.32% | |
| 😎 | 4 | 1.32% | |
| 🤬 | 2 | 0.662% | |
| 👻 | 1 | 0.331% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 0.331% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 470 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Если честно, я не очень люблю заявляться на всякого рода тендеры. Сама по себе процедура позволяет более объективно, на конкурсной основе, выбирать поставщика той или иной услуги. Это да. Но как обычно выглядит общероссийский тендер на оказание какой-либо услуги? Некая компания, в нашем случае застройщик, объявляет тендер на разработку чего-нибудь или проведение какого-нибудь исследования. Неважно. Просто объявляе…
❤14🔥12💯10
Разработали бренд для территории 400 га во Владивостоке В этом проекте сошлось всё: ➡️ удаленная территория ➡️ наша любовь к работе в относительно небольших городах ➡️ наши компетенции в развитии больших территорий Все-таки несколько сотен гектаров встретишь далеко не в каждом проекте. Но он был интересен не только масштабом, но и другими составляющими: структурой, составом, наполнением, логикой развития. Кейс уже…
❤7👍7👌4🔥1
1:2 в пользу банков. Банки забирают 2/3 прибыли девелопера от операционной деятельность (EBITDA). Причем, считают такое распределение справедливым. В силу того, что именно банки финансируют стройку. О том, что проектное финансирование, даже сейчас более чем на 50% покрывается эскроу-счетами, банки скромно умалчивают.. Из разговоров с девелоперами.
❤5🤬2
Цена ошибки в девелопменте очень высока. Поэтому мы в 🌟🌟 всегда стремились расширить арсенал инструментов, которые за счет цифр и аналитики позволяют свести вероятность ошибок к минимуму. Именно так появился сервис анализа земельных участков GMKPotential, который продолжает развиваться и обрастать новыми полезными функциями. Сейчас коллеги запустили новый модуль, которого рынок очень ждал. Он позволяет оценивать пр…
❤4👍4🔥4
Он ее так уважал и боялся, что практически любил.. Решил перечитать «Идиот».
🤣21❤4🔥2👻1
Наши партнеры из Тюмени (пока не буду называть, кто именно…) в поисках толкового руководителя отдела продаж с расширенным функционалом. Нужен человек, который умеет собирать команду, выстраивать процессы, развивать продажи и брать на себя операционное управление. Понимает девелопмент и хочет влиять на результат всей компании, а не только своего отдела. Если у вас есть опыт управления продажами в девелопменте от тре…
👍9💯8❤5
Video message, posted without a caption
🔥7❤5
Ох, не любят организаторы WOW Fest своих членов жюри… Сегодня и завтра рассматриваем кейсы участников WOW Awards, я председательствую. Работаем с 10:00 до 18:00 по Москве. Перерыв на обед нам почему-то не запланировали… С другой стороны, будем в лучшей форме, да?
😁10💯4👍2
Вспоминаю, каким был июль... ➡️ Что мы увидели, проанализировав показатели рынка за второй квартал ➡️ Почему отсутствие «воздуха» вредит продажам во всех классах жилья уже с классического комфорта ➡️ Как платежеспособная аудитория относится к незначительным регулярным расходам (и почему девелоперу стоит это учесть) ➡️ Почему унификация — самая дорогая ошибка в долгосрочной перспективе ➡️ Чем закончилась наша ис…
❤5💯2🔥2
Из договора со Сбер Первый по управлению активами я понял, что гарантировано только одно. А именно то, что свой процент за управление они точно возьмут…
😁26💯11❤4😎4
«Двор без машин» - прошлый век! «Двор без мужчин» - новое позиционирование, которое прозвучало сегодня. Следующий шаг - «Двор без детей, людей, всего…»
😁27💔6🔥3🤯1
Сергей Разуваев про девелопмент pinned a file
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @razuvaevgmk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 15 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Сергей Разуваев про девелопмент” (@razuvaevgmk), 3,686 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/razuvaevgmk.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.