Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Psy christian

Channel

Psy christian

@psy_christian

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,230subscribers

-14 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001272921171
TypeChannel
Username@psy_christian
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/psy_christian

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,2301,2441,2377 August 2026 — 1,244 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,244 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,243 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,241 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,239 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,238 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,237 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,235 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,233 subscribers1 September 2026 — 1,232 subscribers5 September 2026 — 1,231 subscribers18 September 2026 — 1,230 subscribers7 August 202618 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 42 days, net -14. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,228–1,246 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 13:381,230-1
5 Sept 2026, 08:221,231-1
1 Sept 2026, 16:271,232-1
30 Aug 2026, 00:131,233-2
24 Aug 2026, 02:281,235-2
20 Aug 2026, 08:051,237-1
17 Aug 2026, 17:161,238-1
14 Aug 2026, 10:371,239-2
11 Aug 2026, 06:161,241-2
8 Aug 2026, 04:271,243-1
7 Aug 2026, 23:021,244no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:131,244first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 17 November 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
9s
Average length
9s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

541 reactions across 20 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
24144.5%
👍6612.2%
❤‍🔥468.50%
🔥336.10%
🕊244.44%
🎉193.51%
🙏193.51%
👏183.33%
😁183.33%
🤗183.33%
🤔152.77%
101.85%
🥰61.11%
😇30.555%
🤝30.555%
🍾20.37%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 541 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 November 2025 to 26 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

26 Jul 2026, 15:07 UTC230 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Недавно почила Елена (Алена) Майданович – которая первой в России стала записывать и издавать проповеди и беседы митрополита Антония Сурожского. Большая ей благодарность! В интервью Елены Львовны понравилось, как она отстояла границы, на весьма личный вопрос ответив: «Исповедоваться я не готова». А еще ее персона близка мне рациональностью и отсутствием мистицизма дурного извода. Вечная память!!! 🌱

9❤‍🔥8🕊5🙏3

11 Jul 2026, 14:47 UTC378 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

📖Мой друг недавно написал теплую детскую книгу – от всей души рекомендую! вб озон

9🔥5👍3

12 Jun 2026, 13:18 UTC574 views55 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Вопрос ребенку: Что нельзя купить за деньги? Взрослый ждет ответа про любовь, дружбу или душу. А ответили мне: Куст! Потому что детское мышление (примерно до 10–12 лет) максимально конкретно. Дети понимают то, что можно потрогать. Дерево. Облако. Куст. Отделы мозга, отвечающие за сложные метафоры и абстрактные философские концепции (префронтальная кора), у них еще просто физиологически не дозрели. И здесь мы под

26🔥15👍8😁4🤝1🙏1

19 May 2026, 10:10 UTC554 views35 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Разговор с внуком Позвал я внука со двора К открытому окну. — Во что идет у вас игра? — В подводную войну! — В войну? К чему тебе война? Послушай, командир: Война народам не нужна. Играйте лучше в мир. Ушел он, выслушав совет. Потом пришел опять И тихо спрашивает: — Дед, А как же в мир играть?.. Ловя известья, что с утра Передавал эфир, Я думал: перестать пора Играть с войной, чтоб детвора Играть училась в мир!

17🕊13👍41

10 May 2026, 16:10 UTC760 views70 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Недавно протоиерей Андрей Ткачев высказался о популярной идее безусловной любви к себе, назвав ее «блудняком». По его мнению, чтобы любить себя, человек обязан соответствовать определенному моральному уровню, иначе это превращается во вседозволенность. И знаете, как психолог и верующий человек, я прекрасно понимаю его тревогу. Действительно, когда мы слышим из каждого утюга «просто прими себя таким, какой ты есть»,

34👍20👏12🤔4

14 Apr 2026, 08:18 UTC669 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @net_eto_normalnoPhoto

«Мне было очень тяжело принять, что я и мой ребенок никогда не узнаем, кто его отец. Имею ли я право вешать на ребенка такой груз? Не будет ли он меня винить? А если с донором что-то окажется не так? Если воспитание без отца отразится на характере и поведении ребенка? Потяну ли я ребенка? Что будет, если я умру, не вырастив его? Хотя мои родные полностью поддержали меня, и это сняло часть груза с моих плеч, но червь

🤔8👍73🤗2🔥1😇1

10 Apr 2026, 15:26 UTC682 views40 reactionsread 7 August 2026

👍👍👍👍простить себя за ошибки 🧘‍♀️

14🙏147👏4👍1

26 Mar 2026, 13:06 UTC902 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @tozhsober

🤩Тяга Когда человек употребляет, со стороны это часто выглядит как простое решение: захотел — сделал. Да и сам человек порой объясняет это именно как привычку, удовольствие или личный выбор. Но если сделать шаг в сторону и присмотреться, становится видно, что за решением употребить стоит целый процесс. Этому предшествуют: 🤩напряжение, 🤩беспокойство, 🤩внутренний шум, 🤩мысли, которые ходят по кругу, 🤩ощущение, что ч

12👍6🔥6🙏1

4 Mar 2026, 09:00 UTC827 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @tactlessnessPhoto

🗣Если рассматривать 🕑🕜🕞🕖🅰️🕛🅰️ Грэя не как мистического персонажа (чьи грехи рисует портрет), а как реального человека, то его поведение попадает под критерии разных расстройств. Однако центральным, стержневым диагнозом, скорее всего, было бы нарциссическое расстройство личности (НРЛ). 💬Главный критерий НРЛ — это грандиозность (в фантазиях или поведении), постоянная потребность в восхищении и отсутствие эмпатии. Псих

10👍7😇1

27 Feb 2026, 12:26 UTC892 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

🤗Я сейчас

  1. не пощусь38%
  2. держу великий пост57%
  3. держу уразу4%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

5🤔3🤗3😇1

25 Feb 2026, 14:06 UTC867 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

В папку каналов предложили добавиться Ок Сотрудничества пост: 🕊 Собрали папку религиозных каналов Пусть вера укрепляется, а молитва становится живой. 🕊

5🤗3🍾2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @psy_christian. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

27 Feb 2026, 12:26 UTCAnonymous Poll182 voters

🤗Я сейчас

  1. не пощусь38%
  2. держу великий пост57%
  3. держу уразу4%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 November 2025 to 26 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Игумен Нектарий (Морозов)
@igumennektariy · 25,341
Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 14 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Psy christian” (@psy_christian), 1,230 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/psy_christian.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.