Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Психоанализ на Чистых

Channel

Психоанализ на Чистых

@psy_sur_chistye

On this record: Topic · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

5,221subscribers

+93 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001528495183
TypeChannel
Username@psy_sur_chistye
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/psy_sur_chistye

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

5,1275,2215,1746 August 2026 — 5,128 subscribers6 August 2026 — 5,130 subscribers9 August 2026 — 5,129 subscribers12 August 2026 — 5,128 subscribers15 August 2026 — 5,127 subscribers18 August 2026 — 5,135 subscribers21 August 2026 — 5,136 subscribers24 August 2026 — 5,144 subscribers27 August 2026 — 5,143 subscribers30 August 2026 — 5,163 subscribers2 September 2026 — 5,172 subscribers6 September 2026 — 5,180 subscribers10 September 2026 — 5,208 subscribers14 September 2026 — 5,211 subscribers19 September 2026 — 5,221 subscribers6 August 202619 September 2026
15 measurements spanning 44 days, net +93. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,113–5,235 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 08:365,221+10
14 Sept 2026, 17:595,211+3
10 Sept 2026, 18:595,208+28
6 Sept 2026, 00:005,180+8
2 Sept 2026, 05:135,172+9
30 Aug 2026, 10:285,163+20
27 Aug 2026, 07:545,143-1
24 Aug 2026, 14:045,144+8
21 Aug 2026, 04:435,136+1
18 Aug 2026, 11:225,135+8
15 Aug 2026, 20:425,127-1
12 Aug 2026, 18:175,128-1
9 Aug 2026, 23:445,129-1
6 Aug 2026, 16:405,130+2
6 Aug 2026, 13:025,128first reading

Engagement

49 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 49 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 02s
Average length
4m 02s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

270 reactions across 45 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
19170.7%
❤‍🔥3011.1%
👍2810.4%
🔥145.19%
💔31.11%
🤨20.741%
👀10.37%
👌10.37%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 45 of the 49 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 270 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 49 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 15:15 UTC298 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Идёт работа над переводом книги Дени Рибаса «Климатическое отрицание» «Отказ от горевания питает отрицание»

❤‍🔥3🤨2👀1👍1🔥1

11 Aug 2026, 14:05 UTC270 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @psyhocoma

Работа негатива и дезобъектализация В лекции Лариса Ивановна возвращается к трём уровням работы негатива. 🔷 Первый уровень — вытеснение. Хотя вытеснение делает сознательное содержание бессознательным, оно считается высокоорганизованной защитой. Для вытеснения уже должны существовать: • репрезентации; • достаточно развитое Я; • различение сознательного и бессознательного; • возможность символизации. Третий, наибол

4

11 Aug 2026, 11:11 UTC316 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Занятия для первого курса, очное вечернее отделение, которое проходит также и онлайн проходит по понедельникам и пятницам с 19:00 до 22.15

👍4

11 Aug 2026, 07:31 UTC337 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026

https://youtu.be/Qa0y9LwjeGE?si=h5y5Piv064IPAVvz

5

11 Aug 2026, 07:13 UTC267 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @clubfrpa25Photo

Уважаемые коллеги и все, желающие учиться у великих мэтров классического психоанализа! В следующем учебном году запланировано 5 РАЗБОРОВ КЛИНИЧЕСКИХ СЛУЧАЕВ под руководством ДИРАНА ДОНАБЕДЯНА (Diran Donabédian). 🔥До 31.08.26 вы можете приобрести все 5 разборов по цене 5000 рублей, то есть 1 разбор будет стоить 1000 рублей. ⚡️Оплатить можно здесь. Диран Донабедян (Diran Donabédian) - доктор медицины, врач, детск

4👍2

11 Aug 2026, 05:55 UTC303 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026

https://youtu.be/VFAGiQWt1rU?si=xfuzyOQ-bAnj4pYC

5

11 Aug 2026, 04:27 UTC329 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Андре Грин приводит фразу из известной, особенно психоаналитикам, книги Фрица Зорна «Марс» и пишет, что негатив может проявиться так: «Вместо того, чтобы говорить как Марс: «Я там, где больно», пациенты в негативе говорят: «Я не могу быть там, где больно». Именно потому, что способность выдерживать психическую боль минимальна, начинается работа негатива, стирающая пси продукцию, особенно те репрезентации, которые и

6❤‍🔥2👍1

10 Aug 2026, 07:45 UTC339 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Дело даже не в том, можно или нет нарушать правила, а в том, что если есть такое желание – выходить за рамки, следует задуматься о своем личном анализе

❤‍🔥3👌1

10 Aug 2026, 07:45 UTC309 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @psyhocomaVideo

Можно ли нарушать правила?

9

10 Aug 2026, 05:16 UTCviews —

Психоанализ на Чистых pinned «Аренда кабинетов для пси-консультаций -- 400 руб час и комнат для групповых занятий -- 500 руб час Тел.: 8 495 628 11 71 Рядом со ст м Чистые пруды и Китай-город»

10 Aug 2026, 05:15 UTC375 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Аренда кабинетов для пси-консультаций -- 400 руб час и комнат для групповых занятий -- 500 руб час Тел.: 8 495 628 11 71 Рядом со ст м Чистые пруды и Китай-город

8👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 49 posts we hold for @psy_sur_chistye. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Инпсихо | Медиа Московского Института Психоанализа
@Inpsycho · 31,398
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 6 September 2026
Клинический психоанализ
@clinicalpsychoanalysis · 36,589
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 1 September 2026
Анетта Орлова | Философия жизни
@anettaorlova · 40,449
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 4 September 2026
Институт психологии Life Practic
@psypractic_ru · 33,136
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 4 September 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Психоанализ на Чистых” (@psy_sur_chistye), 5,221 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/psy_sur_chistye.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.