Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for طب نفسي بالعربي

Channel

طب نفسي بالعربي

@psychiatry4arabs

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

11,577subscribers

+69 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001655470490
TypeChannel
Username@psychiatry4arabs
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/psychiatry4arabs

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

11,49611,57711,536.56 August 2026 — 11,508 subscribers6 August 2026 — 11,508 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,510 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,512 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,515 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,518 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,517 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,520 subscribers13 August 2026 — 11,523 subscribers14 August 2026 — 11,521 subscribers16 August 2026 — 11,525 subscribers17 August 2026 — 11,524 subscribers18 August 2026 — 11,522 subscribers19 August 2026 — 11,521 subscribers21 August 2026 — 11,518 subscribers23 August 2026 — 11,520 subscribers24 August 2026 — 11,517 subscribers25 August 2026 — 11,515 subscribers26 August 2026 — 11,507 subscribers27 August 2026 — 11,508 subscribers29 August 2026 — 11,505 subscribers30 August 2026 — 11,502 subscribers31 August 2026 — 11,497 subscribers1 September 2026 — 11,496 subscribers2 September 2026 — 11,500 subscribers3 September 2026 — 11,512 subscribers5 September 2026 — 11,527 subscribers9 September 2026 — 11,520 subscribers11 September 2026 — 11,531 subscribers13 September 2026 — 11,555 subscribers15 September 2026 — 11,566 subscribers17 September 2026 — 11,573 subscribers19 September 2026 — 11,577 subscribers6 August 202619 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 44 days, net +69. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,484–11,589 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 12:5911,577+4
17 Sept 2026, 03:1811,573+7
15 Sept 2026, 05:3611,566+11
13 Sept 2026, 12:4211,555+24
11 Sept 2026, 18:3911,531+11
9 Sept 2026, 07:5711,520-7
5 Sept 2026, 22:1711,527+15
3 Sept 2026, 18:0111,512+12
2 Sept 2026, 06:5511,500+4
1 Sept 2026, 08:3511,496-1
31 Aug 2026, 07:2711,497-5
30 Aug 2026, 05:2811,502-3
29 Aug 2026, 02:0411,505-3
27 Aug 2026, 23:0611,508+1
26 Aug 2026, 19:3611,507-8
25 Aug 2026, 17:1311,515-2
24 Aug 2026, 15:2711,517-3
23 Aug 2026, 00:5611,520+2
21 Aug 2026, 13:3811,518-3
19 Aug 2026, 14:3811,521first reading

Engagement

26 posts held, back to 12 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 46 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.0%
avg views ÷ 11,577 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,160
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.71%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 26 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held26 (12 June 2026 – 1 September 2026)
Views total4,641
Reactions total172
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 23:52 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1,450 reactions across 26 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 82.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1,19182.1%
😢694.76%
👏422.90%
👍402.76%
🔥342.34%
💯191.31%
🤯191.31%
💔80.552%
🤔80.552%
🥰60.414%
⚡30.207%
❤‍🔥30.207%
👌30.207%
🤩30.207%
🙏20.138%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 26 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,450 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 12 June 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Sept 2026, 15:00 UTC627 views45 reactionsread 2 September 2026

نحن لا نتعامل مع الواقع مباشرةً؛ بل نتعامل معه من خلال المفاهيم التي نستخدمها لتسميته. وكلما تغيّر تعريف المفهوم، تغيّرت الأشياء التي نلاحظها، والأحكام التي نصدرها، والمشاعر التي نختبرها، والسلوكيات التي نعتبرها ممكنة أو مستحيلة.

❤37👍2👏2💯2🔥2

30 Aug 2026, 13:54 UTC964 views66 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

#تصحيح المشكلة ليست في دعوة الأهل إلى الاستماع لأطفالهم، بل في تحويلها إلى علاقة سببية مبسّطة. فليس كل طفل لم يجد من يصغي إليه سيحتاج لاحقاً إلى علاج نفسي، وليس كل من يحتاج للعلاج كان ضحية لوالدين لم يستمعا إليه. قد يفعل الأهل كل ما يستطيعون، ومع ذلك قد يظهر اضطراب نفسي؛ فالصحة النفسية نتاج تفاعل عوامل بيولوجية ونفسية وأسرية وبيئية. كما قد يتحوّل لوم الأهل أحياناً إلى وسيلة لإسقاط مشكلات المريض عليهم وتجنّب مواجهة …

❤54👍7⚡3👏2

29 Aug 2026, 07:01 UTC≈1,360 views55 reactionsread 2 September 2026

"ولا يمكن ابتكار عقاب أشد شيطانية، إن كان مثل هذا الأمر ممكناً من الناحية المادية، من أن يُلقى بالمرء في المجتمع ويظل غير ملحوظ على الإطلاق. فإذا لم يلتفت أحد عندما ندخل، ولم يسمع أحد عندما نتكلّم، ولم يعبأ أحد بما نفعله، بل إذا كان كل شخص نلتقيه يتجاهلنا تماماً، ويتصرّف كما لو كنّا أشياء غير موجودة، فإنّ نوعاً من الغضب واليأس العاجز سيتصاعد فينا بعد وقت قصير، بحيث تصبح أشد أنواع التعذيب الجسدي قسوةً مصدراً للراحة؛ ل…

❤34😢16💔3👍2

26 Aug 2026, 19:26 UTC≈1,690 views6 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Poll

#Inhalants يرتبط التسمم بأيٍّ من المواد الإنشاقية (Inhalants) التالية بـ نقص بوتاسيوم الدم (Hypokalemia)؟

  1. Toluene19%
  2. Amyl nitrite14%
  3. Nitrous oxide49%
  4. Butane18%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

❤3👍3

24 Aug 2026, 16:40 UTC≈1,980 views68 reactionsread 2 September 2026

في المسافة بين الضرورة والإمكان، بين الشخص الذي أنت عليه والشخص الذي يمكن أن تصبحه، تبدأ عملية تكوين الذات. اضطراب علاقة الإنسان بذاته قد يتخذ اتجاهين متعاكسين؛ فإما أن يرفض أن يكون نفسه، أو قد يريد أن يكون نفسه بطريقة متخيّلة لا تنسجم مع حدوده وواقعه. فالشخص الذي يقول "أنا لن أتغير" يحتاج أن نُعيد إليه الإمكان، بينما الذي يقول "يجب أن أتغيّر بشكل جذري وسأبدأ من الصفر" قد يحتاج ربّما أن نُعيده إلى حدوده وما هو ممكن…

❤68

18 Aug 2026, 16:52 UTC≈2,720 views18 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Poll

#caffeine جميع العبارات التالية صحيحة حول الكافيئين Caffeine، ما عدا:

  1. تبلغ ذروة تركيزه في البلازما عادةً خلال ساعة واحدة من تناوله.10%
  2. يبلغ نصف عمر الكافيئين حوالي 5 ساعات، مع وجود اختلافات فردية.10%
  3. التدخين يُبطئ استقلاب الكافيئين ويزيد نصف عمره.26%
  4. يتباطأ استقلاب الكافيئن بشكل ملحوظ في نهاية الحمل.20%
  5. يثبّط الكافيئين استقلاب الكلوزابين (Clozapine)، مما يؤدي إلى ارتفاع مستويات الكلوزابين.35%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

❤16🤯2

9 Aug 2026, 15:13 UTC≈3,950 views126 reactionsread 2 September 2026

في الثقافة النفسية المعاصرة، كثيراً ما يُنظَر إلى الاستقلال بوصفه علامة على النضج بينما قد يُنظر إلى الحاجة إلى الآخرين باعتبارها ضعفاً أو "تعلُّق مرضي". ما يجب التأكيد عليه أن التعلّق بالآخرين ليس انحراف عن الطبيعي، فالإنسان كائن علائقي والحاجة إلى القرب والأمان تستمر طيلة حياة الإنسان. يصبح التعلُّق مشكلة عندما يتحول إلى تبعية أو خوف مفرط من الهجر أو فقدان للقدرة على اتخاذ القرار والعمل باستقلالية. والوجه الآخر ي…

❤103👏14🥰6🔥3

30 Jul 2026, 19:20 UTC≈3,750 views14 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Poll

أيٌّ من التالي يُعد خاطئاً فيما يتعلق بمتلازمة الشخصية بين النوبات في صرع الفص الصدغي (Gastaut–Geschwind syndrome)؟

  1. فرط الكتابة (Hypergraphia).13%
  2. فرط التديّن أو الانشغال بالفلسفة.16%
  3. فرط الرغبة الجنسية (Hypersexuality).23%
  4. أسلوب كلام مطوّل، لزج، مليء بالتفاصيل (Viscosity).20%
  5. حسب DSM-V TR يمكن تشخيصه كـ Personality Change Due to Another Medical Condition.28%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

❤11❤‍🔥3

25 Jul 2026, 16:02 UTC≈4,300 views100 reactionsread 2 September 2026

من يهرب من قلقه، يهرب في الحقيقة من الباب الذي يقوده إلى ذاته.

❤76😢12💯9💔3

24 Jul 2026, 19:05 UTC≈4,040 views32 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Poll

يُعد ضعف أو غياب استجابة احمرار الجلد بعد تطبيق النياسين (Blunted niacin skin-flush response) مؤشراً حيوياً محتملاً (Potential biomarker) لأي من الاضطرابات النفسية التالية؟

  1. الفصام Schizophrenia.23%
  2. اضطراب الكرب التالي للصدمة PTSD.21%
  3. اضطراب الشخصية المعادية للمجتمع ASPD.11%
  4. اضطراب الوسواس القهري OCD.21%
  5. اضطراب الهلع Panic Disorder.25%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

❤17🤯15

22 Jul 2026, 19:13 UTC≈3,680 views31 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

#history #philosophy 🔴 قراءة تاريخية في الذهان بوصفه محاولة للحفاظ على الذات يُعد رونالد لينغ (R. D. Laing) من أبرز ممثلي التيار الوجودي والفينومينولوجي في الطب النفسي. في كتابه The Divided Self، رأى أن بعض التجارب الذهانية قد تُفهَم كمحاولات للحفاظ على تماسُك الذات أمام شعور بتهديد الوجود، لا كمجرد خلل دماغي. - استند إلى مفهوم انعدام الأمان الأنطولوجي (Ontological Insecurity)، وميّز ثلاثة مخاوف: ⭕️ الابتلاع (Eng…

❤27👏4

18 Jul 2026, 20:10 UTC≈3,090 views34 reactionsread 2 September 2026

#DidYouKnow #bipolar #lithium ⭕️ تبلغ نسبة انتشار الشقيقة (Migraine) لدى مرضى الاضطراب ثنائي القطب (Bipolar Disorder) نحو ضعفين إلى ثلاثة أضعاف مقارنة بعامّة السكان. ✅ هناك أدلة متواضعة تشير إلى أن وجود تاريخ من الشقيقة قد يرتبط باستجابة غير كافية للعلاج الأُحادي بالليثيوم (Lithium monotherapy)، إلا أن هذا الارتباط لم يُثبَت بصورة قاطعة.

❤34

Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @psychiatry4arabs. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@psychiatry4arabs edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
23 August 2026
Most recent edit
23 August 2026

Polls

The 6 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

26 Aug 2026, 19:26 UTCAnonymous Quiz231 voters

#Inhalants يرتبط التسمم بأيٍّ من المواد الإنشاقية (Inhalants) التالية بـ نقص بوتاسيوم الدم (Hypokalemia)؟

  1. Toluene19%
  2. Amyl nitrite14%
  3. Nitrous oxide49%
  4. Butane18%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

18 Aug 2026, 16:52 UTCAnonymous Quiz368 voters

#caffeine جميع العبارات التالية صحيحة حول الكافيئين Caffeine، ما عدا:

  1. تبلغ ذروة تركيزه في البلازما عادةً خلال ساعة واحدة من تناوله.10%
  2. يبلغ نصف عمر الكافيئين حوالي 5 ساعات، مع وجود اختلافات فردية.10%
  3. التدخين يُبطئ استقلاب الكافيئين ويزيد نصف عمره.26%
  4. يتباطأ استقلاب الكافيئن بشكل ملحوظ في نهاية الحمل.20%
  5. يثبّط الكافيئين استقلاب الكلوزابين (Clozapine)، مما يؤدي إلى ارتفاع مستويات الكلوزابين.35%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

30 Jul 2026, 19:20 UTCAnonymous Quiz420 voters

أيٌّ من التالي يُعد خاطئاً فيما يتعلق بمتلازمة الشخصية بين النوبات في صرع الفص الصدغي (Gastaut–Geschwind syndrome)؟

  1. فرط الكتابة (Hypergraphia).13%
  2. فرط التديّن أو الانشغال بالفلسفة.16%
  3. فرط الرغبة الجنسية (Hypersexuality).23%
  4. أسلوب كلام مطوّل، لزج، مليء بالتفاصيل (Viscosity).20%
  5. حسب DSM-V TR يمكن تشخيصه كـ Personality Change Due to Another Medical Condition.28%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

24 Jul 2026, 19:05 UTCAnonymous Quiz442 voters

يُعد ضعف أو غياب استجابة احمرار الجلد بعد تطبيق النياسين (Blunted niacin skin-flush response) مؤشراً حيوياً محتملاً (Potential biomarker) لأي من الاضطرابات النفسية التالية؟

  1. الفصام Schizophrenia.23%
  2. اضطراب الكرب التالي للصدمة PTSD.21%
  3. اضطراب الشخصية المعادية للمجتمع ASPD.11%
  4. اضطراب الوسواس القهري OCD.21%
  5. اضطراب الهلع Panic Disorder.25%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

11 Jul 2026, 11:27 UTCAnonymous Quiz529 voters

تقريباً، ما هي نسبة الإصابة بالفصام (Schizophrenia) عند مريض يعاني من متلازمة دي جورج (DiGeorge syndrome)؟

  1. 1%10%
  2. 5-10%41%
  3. 20-25%38%
  4. 45-50%11%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

12 Jun 2026, 18:37 UTCAnonymous Quiz230 voters

#neurocognitive #dementia رجل 60 سنة يتمتع بصحة جيدة، خضع لزرع قرنية. بعد ثلاثة أشهر أصبح مصاباً بخرف شديد. عند الفحص يَظهر لديه رمع عضلي (myoclonic jerks). يُظهِر تخطيط الدماغ: "periodic bursts of electrical activity superimposed on a slow background".

  1. Major neurocognitive disorder due to another medical condition (Wilson disease).16%
  2. Major vascular neurocognitive disorder.14%
  3. Major neurocognitive disorder due to a prion disease (Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease).44%
  4. Major neurocognitive disorder with Lewy Bodies.16%
  5. Pseudodementia secondary to a major depressive disorder.10%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 12 June 2026 to 1 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

🔴 منصة الصحة السورية - MedDose
@meddose · 28,755
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 9 September 2026
مكتبة الطب النفسي وعلم النفس .Psychology and psychiatry Library
@ilmnafsi · 31,287
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 6 September 2026
Sherine's Fan Club
@SherineFanClub · 70,289
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 28 August 2026
فيروز Fairouz
@Fairouziat · 43,987
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 2 September 2026
MedBoss
@MedBOSS_Team · 23,413
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 18 September 2026
الاختصاص في سوريا 🩺
@Specialization_Syria · 23,424
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 18 September 2026
ملفات الماني للدكتوره لين
@german90gooo · 31,746
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 6 September 2026

This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“طب نفسي بالعربي” (@psychiatry4arabs), 11,577 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/psychiatry4arabs.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.