Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
33 measurements spanning 43 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 22,905–23,000 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 12:20
22,942
+22
16 Sept 2026, 03:59
22,920
+4
14 Sept 2026, 08:41
22,916
-2
12 Sept 2026, 16:19
22,918
-11
10 Sept 2026, 14:36
22,929
-14
7 Sept 2026, 13:17
22,943
-20
4 Sept 2026, 13:21
22,963
+3
1 Sept 2026, 19:34
22,960
-6
31 Aug 2026, 18:48
22,966
-11
30 Aug 2026, 19:53
22,977
+3
29 Aug 2026, 22:36
22,974
-1
29 Aug 2026, 01:38
22,975
+1
28 Aug 2026, 00:12
22,974
+7
27 Aug 2026, 00:44
22,967
-6
26 Aug 2026, 01:16
22,973
-2
25 Aug 2026, 03:36
22,975
-11
23 Aug 2026, 18:04
22,986
-3
21 Aug 2026, 23:56
22,989
+4
20 Aug 2026, 15:09
22,985
+5
19 Aug 2026, 17:37
22,980
first reading
Engagement
30 posts held, back to 31 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
3.54%
avg views ÷ 22,942 subscribers
Avg views / post
813
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.205%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 30 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 6 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held
30 (31 December 2025 – 3 September 2026)
Views total
4,878
Reactions total
3
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 11:56 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
49 reactions across 14 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 89.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
44
89.8%
👎
5
10.2%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 30 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 49 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 31 December 2025 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🚨CLINICAMED GIVEAWAY🚨
INR 8,000 for medical students
2 winners. Each winner gets INR 4,000 by UPI.
ClinicaMed is a new exam-prep platform — mock tests, question banks and flashcards for NEET PG, INICET, FMGE, NExT and USMLE.
ONLY 2 STEPS TO ENTER:
1️⃣Follow our Instagram and join our Telegram community
→ instagram.com/clinicamed_hq
→ t.me/clinicamed_community
2️⃣To claim your entry: follow instagram.com/rza_ryan on…
Ambivalence is the inability to decide for or against, due to co-existence of two opposing impulses for the same thing at the same time in the same person. It is an important feature of schizophrenia. It is also seen with OCD, and other borderline conditions.
Abulia - Inability to make a decision generally. Unlike ambivalence, there are no opposing impulses present.
Anhedonia - Loss of pleasure in previously pleasu…
🚨 NEET PG 2026 DOCUMENT CLARIFICATION 🩺
A few important clarifications regarding the documents to carry on exam day:
✅ 1. ADMIT CARD
▪️ If your admit card consists of 2 pages, print BOTH pages in COLOUR on ONE A4 white sheet, BACK-TO-BACK.
▪️ Page 1 → Front side
▪️ Page 2 → Back side
▪️ Do not print only one page.
📌 2. REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE
▪️ Carry a COLOUR photocopy of your valid Permanent/Provisional SMC/MCI…
Just 1 week to NEET PG.
One week between you and an exam that can influence so much of your life:
Your work satisfaction.
Your future income.
Your recognition.
Your city.
Your working culture.
Your professional freedom.
But remember one thing:
You don’t need more resources now.
You need focus, revision and execution.
7 days.
No distractions.
No panic.
Give it everything. 🔥
The exam is not asking whether you stu…
Delusion is a disturbance of thought content.
Disorders of perception.
1.Illusion- Incorrect perception or misinterpretation of a sensory stimulus.
2.Hallucinations- Perception in the absence of any stimulus.
3.Depersonalization- Feeling that one is not oneself or that something has changed.
4.Derealization- Feeling that one's environment
Which of the following endocrine tumors is most commonly seen in MEN 1?
#NEET PG #INICET #PYQ #FMGE
a) Insulinoma30%
b) Gastrinoma49%
c) Glucagonoma11%
Somatostatmoma10%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👎2👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 30 posts we hold for @psychiatry_vid. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 31 December 2025 to 3 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 29 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 19 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
سلسلة قنوات الإحسان الطبية @alehssan_serial · 24,594 Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 16 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Psychiatry” (@psychiatry_vid), 22,942 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/psychiatry_vid.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
