Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Доктор Психтер

Channel

Доктор Психтер

@psyhter

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,709subscribers

-31 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001161766462
TypeChannel
Username@psyhter
Created21 December 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live29 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 29 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/psyhter

Growth

8,7098,7408,724.56 August 2026 — 8,740 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,738 subscribers9 August 2026 — 8,734 subscribers13 August 2026 — 8,729 subscribers16 August 2026 — 8,722 subscribers23 August 2026 — 8,713 subscribers26 August 2026 — 8,716 subscribers29 August 2026 — 8,709 subscribers6 August 202629 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 23 days, net -31. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,704–8,745 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
29 Aug 2026, 09:548,709-7
26 Aug 2026, 10:378,716+3
23 Aug 2026, 07:388,713-9
16 Aug 2026, 16:568,722-7
13 Aug 2026, 00:178,729-5
9 Aug 2026, 19:068,734-4
6 Aug 2026, 17:118,738-2
6 Aug 2026, 04:218,740first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 11 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 28 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.5%
avg views ÷ 8,709 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,520
1 post measured
Reaction rate
5.53%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 August 2026
Posts held21 (11 April 202622 August 2026)
Views total1,520
Reactions total84
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 16:25 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

2,452 reactions across 21 posts, in 31 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
86135.1%
💯39716.2%
💔33413.6%
😁1626.61%
🔥1275.18%
😭1204.89%
🥰1024.16%
👍843.43%
😢612.49%
🤝451.84%
❤‍🔥261.06%
💊170.693%
💩170.693%
🤗150.612%
👎120.489%
🥴120.489%
🤣110.449%
👏80.326%
🤪80.326%
🕊70.285%
11 further kinds261.06%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,452reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 11 April 2026 to 22 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
12
across the posts below
Posts paid on
8
of 21 we hold a reading for · 38%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @psyhter. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 21 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 11 April 2026 to 22 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

22 Aug 2026, 20:21 UTC≈1,520 views84 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Простите

🤝30😁20💯1810😭3💩1😢1😨1

30 Jul 2026, 15:11 UTC≈3,010 views125 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Как ощущается взросление аутистичной девочки

💔78💯16🤗155🔥5🤣5🤮1

21 Jul 2026, 15:33 UTC≈4,390 views156 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

💯70😭57👍15🤪8💊2🔥21💩1

20 Jul 2026, 01:06 UTC≈3,410 views51 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Девушка учится на клинического психолога и приглашает принять участие в ее психологическом исследовании для дипломной работы. «Плюс к карме и привлечение удачи всем, кто присоединится!💯» Подходят люди в возрасте от 18 лет. Время прохождения 15-20 минут! Исследование «Соотношение перфекционизма, нарциссизма и удовлетворенности жизнью» Очень важны ответы людей с самым разным жизненным опытом. Исследовательница буд

434🖕2🤝2

17 Jul 2026, 02:49 UTC≈3,910 views163 reactions1 Starread 28 August 2026

Во времена моей учебы в медицинском, на 5м курсе мы ходили на занятия в психиатрическую больницу. Около ворот больницы частенько стояли люди, раздававшие листовки «вред психиатрии», у меня до сих пор где-то лежат эти листовки и буклеты. В ординатуре от старших товарищей досталась ссылка на облачное хранилище с книгами, в том числе с теми, которые можно называть «антипсихиатрией». Там были переводы на русский язык в

106💔33👍14💯4🔥4💩2

10 Jul 2026, 20:46 UTC≈3,330 views159 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Бывает так, что человек постоянно работает над собой не потому, что ему действительно интересно развиваться, а потому что за этим стоит убеждение: «со мной что-то не так». Каждое новое достижение это попытка наконец стать «достаточно хорошим». Кажется, что еще немного, и наступит момент, когда можно будет перестать себя исправлять, расслабиться и почувствовать внутреннее спокойствие. Но этот момент не наступает. П

💔8942❤‍🔥11💯8👍3😢2😭2🤝1

6 Jul 2026, 19:02 UTC≈3,740 views53 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Реклама из газеты "Нижегородские губернские ведомости" №19 от 10 мая 1895г.

😁2622👍3💩1🔥1

20 Jun 2026, 20:56 UTC≈5,150 views163 reactions2 Starsread 28 August 2026

Почему нейроотличные могут расстраиваться по субботам? В пятницу вечером мы говорим себе «я отдохну завтра». Наступает суббота, мы валяемся, скроллим телефон, кое как поели, моргнул — время уже почти 5 часов вечера, за день ничего не сделано, появляется ощущение, что выходной день потерян. Дело в том, что нейроотличный мозг «прикрыл лавочку»: с понедельника по пятницу он улавливал интонацию, отслеживал эмоциональны

123💯20👍12🔥4💩2🗿2

18 Jun 2026, 01:06 UTC≈3,520 views17 reactions1 Starread 28 August 2026

Друзья, продолжается общественное обсуждение по поводу клинических рекомендаций по лечению РАС у детей. Ознакомьтесь тут

16🤮1

17 Jun 2026, 14:30 UTC≈3,670 views110 reactions1 Starread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @lentacholdPhoto

Дополняем 👇

😁79👍13😭8🤣6💩21👾1

10 Jun 2026, 20:46 UTC≈7,260 views182 reactions3 Starsread 28 August 2026

Родитель, который измеряет свою любовь тем, как сильно он страдал, позже будет обвинять ребенка в эгоизме просто за то, что тот отказывается унаследовать те же страдания

💯13521🔥15🤝4😭3💩2😁2

29 May 2026, 19:47 UTC≈5,490 views143 reactions2 Starsread 28 August 2026

Больше всего в расстройстве пищевого поведения меня бесит, как сильно и как надолго въедаются всякие триггеры, установки и пр. К примеру, можно перестать считать калории, но все равно помнить, что в зеленом яблоке 45-58 ккал. Или, мое любимое, ловить прилив энергии и улучшение самооценки от «отвеса» в 300-500гр и каждый раз попадаться в ловушку самокритики после привеса в эти же несчастные 300-500гр. До конца так

80😭44🔥10🤝8💩1

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @psyhter. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 159,020 of 1,625,404entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Доктор Сычев
@dr_sychev · 49,042
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 26 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Доктор Психтер” (@psyhter), 8,709 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/psyhter.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.