Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for А ты точно психотерапевт?

Channel

А ты точно психотерапевт?

@areyoupsy

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

773subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001321909848
TypeChannel
Username@areyoupsy
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live24 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 24 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/areyoupsy

Growth

769774771.57 August 2026 — 774 subscribers8 August 2026 — 774 subscribers8 August 2026 — 773 subscribers16 August 2026 — 769 subscribers24 August 2026 — 773 subscribers7737 August 202624 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 17 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 768–775 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
24 Aug 2026, 20:16773+4
16 Aug 2026, 21:54769-4
8 Aug 2026, 13:41773-1
8 Aug 2026, 01:48774no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:39774first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 26 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
30.1%
avg views ÷ 773 subscribers
Avg views / post
232
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.34%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held15 (26 June 20267 August 2026)
Views total1,162
Reactions total62
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 01:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

270 reactions across 15 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
13248.9%
🔥5420.0%
💔3713.7%
😁145.19%
🤔103.70%
🤝82.96%
👍62.22%
🗿62.22%
👎20.741%
👀10.37%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 270reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 26 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 16:04 UTC98 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @your_sherlock

Пришло время подробно рассказать, что уже больше года происходит вокруг «Чистых Когниций» и «Школы ЧК». Весной 2025 года мы прекратили сотрудничество с руководителями школы — Региной Якубжановой и Владиславом Ивановым. Мы были готовы оставить им соцсети, сайт, клиентскую базу, курсы и другие активы школы, попросив только об одном — сменить название. Но наши экс-коллеги отказались. Позже мы выяснили, что 25 марта 20

💔71

4 Aug 2026, 19:52 UTC202 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁14🔥3

31 Jul 2026, 17:43 UTC475 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

Привет! Перевел очередную книгу - абсолютно новый протокол КПТ для пациентов с РПП и дефицитом массы тела от международных экспертов по лечению РПП. Очень мне понравился! Можно смело распространять)

10

31 Jul 2026, 17:39 UTC285 views24 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

простите, отлетела немножко. нам привезли собачку и мы выстраиваем быт теперь под собачку и ее прогулки. полторы недели прошли, вроде как встроились в ритм. показывайте своих!

🔥177

21 Jul 2026, 15:37 UTC418 views31 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @psyhterPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

💔16🤝6🗿5👍31

18 Jul 2026, 15:50 UTC484 views29 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Я очень не люблю чат жпт как генератор контента, например, постов или обзоров статей, тк мышление клишируется, но он, оказывается, здорово упрощает жизнь, если жаль время на canva или фотошопчик🤣 Я скинула в него инфу из книжки джефри янга, и от девида берштейна, и он все уместно скомпоновал

🔥1710👎2

16 Jul 2026, 08:35 UTC532 views26 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

Некоторые люди живут с ощущением, что они недостаточно сильны, чтобы справляться со сложностями жизни. Даже небольшие жизненные задачи кажутся непреодолимыми, а мысль о самостоятельном решении вызывает тревогу. Со стороны это выглядит как инфантильность, и обычно такое поведение вызывает много раздражения у других. В схема-терапии это режим «беспомощного капитулянта».

💔1412

11 Jul 2026, 08:38 UTC574 views32 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Попросила чат жпт оформить чать навыков дбт в схему, что когда и как использовать

17🔥15

2 Jul 2026, 07:46 UTC621 views24 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Если вам интересно про женщин, но без радикальной повестки, а в контексте истории, культуры, социологии и современности, то вот отличные книжки. Минусы: после них жизнь не станет прежней.

24

2 Jul 2026, 07:31 UTC467 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Прочитав историю жены, вторую смену и послушав подкастики про феминизм, могу сказать, что вот правду говорят: "не все мужчины, но всегда мужчины".🥲🫠

14🤔4🔥1

30 Jun 2026, 15:42 UTC477 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

Попробовала рассказать про факторы уязвимости в дбт в голосовухе.

4👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @areyoupsy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 309,677 of 1,625,954entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“А ты точно психотерапевт?” (@areyoupsy), 773 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/areyoupsy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.