Channel
@quality_cult
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
818subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001489068055 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @quality_cult |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/quality_cult |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Sept 2026, 00:16 | 818 | +1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 20:24 | 817 | -2 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 05:38 | 819 | -2 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 06:13 | 821 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:32 | 822 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:08 | 822 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 31 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
105 reactions across 8 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 43 | 41.0% | |
| 💯 | 18 | 17.1% | |
| 🎉 | 14 | 13.3% | |
| 👍 | 10 | 9.52% | |
| 👀 | 7 | 6.67% | |
| 😁 | 6 | 5.71% | |
| ❤ | 5 | 4.76% | |
| 🤝 | 2 | 1.90% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 105 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 31 December 2025 to 26 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Квалити культ | Толчеев Владислав pinned «Хочу записать видео с разбором вопросов про вкат в QA Automation Если заходите с нуля, переходите из ручного QA или уже учитесь — накидайте вопросов: про стек, обучение, практику, собесы, поиск работы и всё, что сейчас стопорит Соберу вопросы и отвечу на…»
Хочу записать видео с разбором вопросов про вкат в QA Automation Если заходите с нуля, переходите из ручного QA или уже учитесь — накидайте вопросов: про стек, обучение, практику, собесы, поиск работы и всё, что сейчас стопорит Соберу вопросы и отвечу на них в отдельном ролике Форма анонимная, заполнить — 2 минуты: https://forms.gle/cy58JQ2SxHJnVWKQ6
🔥5
Кто поедет?
🔥2
Выиграй бесплатный билет на конференцию "Профсоюзная" Розыгрываем 3 билета на конференцию от работяг для работяг. Для участия в розыгрыше достаточно сделать всего 2 простых действия: 1) Подписаться на телеграмм каналы "Осознанная меркантильность" и "IT менторы - отзывы на офферы" 2) Нажать кнопку "Участвовать" * Чем больше друзей пригласишь на участие в розыгрыше – тем больше шансов на победу 🐺🐺🐺Не пропусти шанс п…
Не теряем доступ к чатам и каналам
Устраиваем отрицательный рост замедлению Ребята, последнее время у всех наблюдаются сложности при использовании наших ботов и miniapp'a. Ниже присылаем инструкцию как решить проблему недоступности: 1. Необходимо произвести донастройку ТГ в ручном режиме, ниже высылаем кнопку для автоматической донастройки ТГ: Настройка 1 Настройка 2 Настройка 3 Настройка 4 Настройка 5 Настройка 6 Настройка 7 Настройка 8 Настройка …
❤5👍2
Го участвовать и друзей звать в опросе, это полезная статистика по рынку
ОПРОС: Сколько айтишников крутит опыт, увольняют ли, помогло ли устроиться Собрали вопросы, которые помогут понять, почему айтишники на самом деле вынуждены накручивать опыт и как это действительно влияет на работу. В опросе всего 13 пунктов, прохождение займет меньше 5 минут, а результаты мы выложим публично и покажем HR-ам. Пересылай друзьям из IT — опрос полностью анонимный. Ссылка на опрос: https://forms.gle/d…
👍8🤝2
Как же мощно эНэН ру греет работяг на курсы (причем нерелевантные) Аж в двух частях экранов. Можно еще при создании резюме спрашивать "А ТЫ ПРОШËЛ ЭТОТ ВОЛШЕБНЫЙ КУРС?! ЕЩË НЕТ!? НАДО КУПИТЬ И ТОЛЬКО ПОСЛЕ ВВОДА КОДА ПОСЛЕ ПОКУПКИ ИЗ ПОЧТЫ СМОЖЕШЬ ОПУБЛИКОВАТЬ РЕЗЮМКУ!"
💯18👀7😁6
Хочу на следующей неделе провести эксперимент: сделаю новое резюме и посмотрим на конверсии и тд (не прогрев, честна) Под какой стэк делаем?
🔥23
Делаем резюме AQA на
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Квалити культ | Толчеев Владислав pinned «Без булщит прогревов сходу: Перекат из ручного в AQA Java Если хочешь в этом году новую работу в роли автоматизатора, то пиши в ЛС @tolcheevvladislav Upd. Набрали группу)»
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @quality_cult. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Делаем резюме AQA на
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 31 December 2025 to 26 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Квалити культ | Толчеев Владислав” (@quality_cult), 818 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/quality_cult.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.