Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for رعد الكردي

Channel

رعد الكردي

@raadalkurdy

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

26,469subscribers

-305 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001097500764
TypeChannel
Username@raadalkurdy
Created9 October 2016measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 September 2026
Measurements held30
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/raadalkurdy

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

26,46926,77526,6225 August 2026 — 26,774 subscribers6 August 2026 — 26,774 subscribers8 August 2026 — 26,771 subscribers9 August 2026 — 26,775 subscribers10 August 2026 — 26,759 subscribers11 August 2026 — 26,754 subscribers12 August 2026 — 26,752 subscribers13 August 2026 — 26,743 subscribers14 August 2026 — 26,730 subscribers16 August 2026 — 26,711 subscribers17 August 2026 — 26,689 subscribers18 August 2026 — 26,676 subscribers19 August 2026 — 26,666 subscribers20 August 2026 — 26,662 subscribers21 August 2026 — 26,657 subscribers22 August 2026 — 26,641 subscribers24 August 2026 — 26,621 subscribers25 August 2026 — 26,623 subscribers26 August 2026 — 26,613 subscribers27 August 2026 — 26,602 subscribers28 August 2026 — 26,594 subscribers29 August 2026 — 26,589 subscribers30 August 2026 — 26,579 subscribers31 August 2026 — 26,570 subscribers31 August 2026 — 26,557 subscribers1 September 2026 — 26,545 subscribers2 September 2026 — 26,525 subscribers4 September 2026 — 26,518 subscribers6 September 2026 — 26,499 subscribers10 September 2026 — 26,469 subscribers5 August 202610 September 2026
30 measurements spanning 35 days, net -305. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 26,423–26,821 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 30
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Sept 2026, 03:0126,469-30
6 Sept 2026, 17:1726,499-19
4 Sept 2026, 08:3726,518-7
2 Sept 2026, 22:5826,525-20
1 Sept 2026, 22:1426,545-12
31 Aug 2026, 23:2726,557-13
31 Aug 2026, 01:3726,570-9
30 Aug 2026, 03:3526,579-10
29 Aug 2026, 04:3526,589-5
28 Aug 2026, 07:2326,594-8
27 Aug 2026, 09:1626,602-11
26 Aug 2026, 06:3826,613-10
25 Aug 2026, 06:4626,623+2
24 Aug 2026, 07:4726,621-20
22 Aug 2026, 14:4926,641-16
21 Aug 2026, 08:3326,657-5
20 Aug 2026, 09:5826,662-4
19 Aug 2026, 11:4426,666-10
18 Aug 2026, 10:4326,676-13
17 Aug 2026, 12:1426,689first reading

Engagement

27 posts held, back to 28 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 59 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
13.6%
avg views ÷ 26,469 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,610
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.50%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 27 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held27 (28 March 20261 September 2026)
Views total25,280
Reactions total886
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 11:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
22m 43s
Average length
1m 05s

Measured directly from 21 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

3,860 reactions across 27 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 82.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3,18082.4%
👍3248.39%
🥰2947.62%
👏621.61%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 27 of the 27 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,860 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 28 March 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Sept 2026, 17:15 UTC≈1,190 views76 reactionsread 3 September 2026

https://youtu.be/8yTC55_Kj-g?si=auf9RQyElq72asK4

63🥰5👍4👏4

29 Aug 2026, 20:38 UTC≈2,530 views125 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

{ إِنَّ ٱلَّذِینَ كَفَرُوا۟ وَمَاتُوا۟ وَهُمۡ كُفَّارٌ أُو۟لَـٰۤىِٕكَ عَلَیۡهِمۡ لَعۡنَةُ ٱللَّهِ وَٱلۡمَلَـٰۤىِٕكَةِ وَٱلنَّاسِ أَجۡمَعِینَ } [سُورَةُ البَقَرَةِ: ١٦١]

106🥰10👍9

25 Aug 2026, 19:55 UTC≈3,670 views168 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

سورة الإنسان

135👍14🥰14👏5

18 Aug 2026, 20:13 UTC≈5,010 views150 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

{ وَٱصۡبِرۡ لِحُكۡمِ رَبِّكَ فَإِنَّكَ بِأَعۡیُنِنَاۖ وَسَبِّحۡ بِحَمۡدِ رَبِّكَ حِینَ تَقُومُ (٤٨) وَمِنَ ٱلَّیۡلِ فَسَبِّحۡهُ وَإِدۡبَـٰرَ ٱلنُّجُومِ (٤٩) } [سُورَةُ الطُّورِ] #رعد_الكردي

126👍15🥰9

15 Aug 2026, 22:31 UTC≈4,890 views128 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

{ إِنَّمَا حَرَّمَ عَلَیۡكُمُ ٱلۡمَیۡتَةَ وَٱلدَّمَ وَلَحۡمَ ٱلۡخِنزِیرِ وَمَاۤ أُهِلَّ لِغَیۡرِ ٱللَّهِ بِهِۦۖ فَمَنِ ٱضۡطُرَّ غَیۡرَ بَاغࣲ وَلَا عَادࣲ فَإِنَّ ٱللَّهَ غَفُورࣱ رَّحِیمࣱ } [سُورَةُ النَّحۡلِ: ١١٥]

104🥰13👍11

15 Aug 2026, 22:30 UTC≈4,280 views124 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

{ وَمَاۤ أَدۡرَىٰكَ مَا یَوۡمُ ٱلدِّینِ (١٧) ثُمَّ مَاۤ أَدۡرَىٰكَ مَا یَوۡمُ ٱلدِّینِ (١٨) یَوۡمَ لَا تَمۡلِكُ نَفۡسࣱ لِّنَفۡسࣲ شَیۡـࣰٔاۖ وَٱلۡأَمۡرُ یَوۡمَىِٕذࣲ لِّلَّهِ (١٩) } [سُورَةُ الانفِطَارِ: ١٧-١٩]

101👍14🥰9

15 Aug 2026, 22:28 UTC≈3,710 views115 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

{ وَإِذَاۤ أَرَدۡنَاۤ أَن نُّهۡلِكَ قَرۡیَةً أَمَرۡنَا مُتۡرَفِیهَا فَفَسَقُوا۟ فِیهَا فَحَقَّ عَلَیۡهَا ٱلۡقَوۡلُ فَدَمَّرۡنَـٰهَا تَدۡمِیرࣰا } [سُورَةُ الإِسۡرَاءِ: ١٦]

95🥰12👍8

1 Aug 2026, 21:24 UTC≈6,290 views172 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

{ رَبَّنَا لَا تُزِغۡ قُلُوبَنَا بَعۡدَ إِذۡ هَدَیۡتَنَا وَهَبۡ لَنَا مِن لَّدُنكَ رَحۡمَةًۚ إِنَّكَ أَنتَ ٱلۡوَهَّابُ } [سُورَةُ آلِ عِمۡرَانَ: ٨]

141👍15🥰14👏2

31 Jul 2026, 16:04 UTC≈5,780 views155 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @videoqoranVideo

الشيخ رعد الكردي سورة الزلزلة

130👍10🥰10👏5

11 Jun 2026, 18:48 UTC≈11,400 views200 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

تلاوة عراقية لسورة الضحى

164👍14🥰14👏8

11 Jun 2026, 18:48 UTC≈10,500 views148 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

{ لَیۡسَ عَلَیۡكُمۡ جُنَاحٌ أَن تَبۡتَغُوا۟ فَضۡلࣰا مِّن رَّبِّكُمۡۚ فَإِذَاۤ أَفَضۡتُم مِّنۡ عَرَفَـٰتࣲ فَٱذۡكُرُوا۟ ٱللَّهَ عِندَ ٱلۡمَشۡعَرِ ٱلۡحَرَامِۖ وَٱذۡكُرُوهُ كَمَا هَدَىٰكُمۡ وَإِن كُنتُم مِّن قَبۡلِهِۦ لَمِنَ ٱلضَّاۤلِّینَ } [سُورَةُ البَقَرَةِ: ١٩٨]

120🥰12👍11👏5

11 Jun 2026, 18:48 UTC≈9,350 views129 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

ما تيسر من سورة الانعام { ۞ وَإِذۡ قَالَ إِبۡرَ ٰ⁠هِیمُ لِأَبِیهِ ءَازَرَ أَتَتَّخِذُ أَصۡنَامًا ءَالِهَةً إِنِّیۤ أَرَىٰكَ وَقَوۡمَكَ فِی ضَلَـٰلࣲ مُّبِینࣲ }]

107👍11🥰11

Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @raadalkurdy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

القارئ اسلام صبحي
@islam_sobhi · 99,920
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 20 August 2026
عبدالرحمن مسعد
@im9Li9 · 68,935
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 20 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“رعد الكردي” (@raadalkurdy), 26,469 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/raadalkurdy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.