Channel
@rahhaye_mamnoe
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
3,041subscribers
-37 since we began measuring on 19 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002122206473 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @rahhaye_mamnoe |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 20 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/rahhaye_mamnoe |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 03:00 | 3,041 | -9 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 12:17 | 3,050 | -9 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 09:02 | 3,059 | -5 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 16:14 | 3,064 | -6 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 13:04 | 3,070 | -2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 15:48 | 3,072 | -3 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 22:03 | 3,075 | -3 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 00:00 | 3,078 | no change |
| 19 Aug 2026, 23:45 | 3,078 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
7 reactions across 7 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👏 | 3 | 42.9% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 14.3% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 14.3% | |
| 💘 | 1 | 14.3% | |
| 🤗 | 1 | 14.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
۲۱ سال پیش هشداری داده شد؛ امروز دوباره باید آن را شنید. مریم رجوی در سال ۲۰۰۴ در پارلمان اروپا، سیاست غرب در برابر رژیم ایران را با تجربه تلخ «مونیخ ۱۹۳۸» مقایسه کرد؛ تجربهای که نشان داد امتیاز دادن به یک دیکتاتوری، الزاماً مانع بحران و جنگ نمیشود. پیام او روشن بود: حق مردم ایران برای آزادی نباید قربانی مصلحتجویی و مماشات شود. مقاومت ایران از جامعه جهانی پول و سلاح نمیخواهد؛ خواهان آن است که در برابر مبارزه مر…
Video, posted without a caption
Video, posted without a caption
برای آزادی، فقط تماشاگر نباشیم. ✊ از فرانسه تا هر کجای جهان، هرکس میتواند سهمی در رساندن صدای مردم ایران داشته باشد. این بانوی جوان انتخاب کرده تنها نظارهگر نباشد و با حمایت از سیمای آزادی، در حفظ یک صدای مستقل در کنار مقاومت مردم ایران سهیم شود. استقلال یک رسانه آزادیخواه یعنی صدایی که متکی به قدرتها و دولتها نباشد و متکی به مردم خودش باشد تا بتواند بیوقفه صدای اعتراض، مقاومت و آرزوی آزادی مردم ایران را بازتا…
🖤💕 گلریزان همیاری: ما جمعی از هوادار مجاهدین خلق ایران در ترکیه، با تمام توان و از صمیم قلب، در سیامین سالگرد همیاری با سیمای آزادی سهیم شدیم شاید تعدادمان کم باشد، اما عشقمان به ایران آزاد و حمایتمان از صدای آزادی، بزرگ و بیپایان است. ❤️🇮🇷
Video, posted without a caption
🎥 #آفساید - مصاحبه پرحاشیه رویترز با بچه شاه ✳️از «صلاحیت رهبری» تا «فداکاری برای کشور»؛ اما پاسخ روشن به یک سؤال ساده: دقیقاً چه چیزی را رهبری و به سرانجام رساندهای؟ خبرگزاری رویترز گزارش مفصلی منتشر کرد با عنوان: «نگاهی به تلاش متزلزل رضا پهلوی برای رهبری ایران». این مصاحبه از جهات مختلف خیلی جنجالی شد. بهخاطر برخی سؤالاتش که در یک مصاحبه یکساعته، ازش پرسیدن، اون هم بعد از عبور از ۷ لایه اطرافیان! برای اینکه…
Video, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
❤1
هشدار مسعود رجوی در اولین سالگرد فروغ جاویدان به پاسداران و شکنجه گران
🎉1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @rahhaye_mamnoe. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“✊راههای ممنوعه” (@rahhaye_mamnoe), 3,041 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rahhaye_mamnoe.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.