🔴سرنگونی آخوندها از لولهی تفنگها و ارادههای این قهرمانان است که بیرون میآید ➖تصاویری از کانونهای شورشی،واحد ارتشآزادیبخش در ایران 🔴@shoureshgarane
❤9🤝1🤣1

Channel
@shoureshgarane
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
98,487subscribers
+31,529 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001159479907 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @shoureshgarane |
| Description | ادمین تماس: @mabazmigardim برای فعالیت میدانی پیام بدید: @amir_radmardan کلیپهای خاص @shoureshgaran2 اینستاگرام: instagram.com/shoureshgaran ایکس: https://x.com/alefmehr1 |
| Created | 20 March 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 58 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 3 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/shoureshgarane |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Nov 2026, 14:45 | 98,487 | -1,528 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 15:14 | 100,015 | +7,884 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 12:00 | 92,131 | +3,420 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 10:59 | 88,711 | -595 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 11:15 | 89,306 | -468 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 14:38 | 89,774 | -557 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 16:30 | 90,331 | -547 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 18:59 | 90,878 | -604 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 20:46 | 91,482 | -1,011 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 19:19 | 92,493 | +4,860 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 17:00 | 87,633 | +3,656 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 17:09 | 83,977 | -370 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 18:28 | 84,347 | -402 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 14:49 | 84,749 | -463 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 13:48 | 85,212 | -385 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 15:34 | 85,597 | -309 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 16:55 | 85,906 | -438 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 13:58 | 86,344 | -394 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 16:00 | 86,738 | -490 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 15:00 | 87,228 | first reading |
1,295 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 186 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 449 of 451 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 1,295 (5 August 2026 – 4 November 2026) |
| Views total | 1,370,530 |
| Reactions total | 14,364 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 4 Nov 2026, 09:11 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 452 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
33,226 reactions across 995 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 7,492 | 22.5% | |
| ❤ | 5,216 | 15.7% | |
| 👏 | 3,868 | 11.6% | |
| custom 6005947902969517168 | 2,566 | 7.72% | |
| 🔥 | 2,151 | 6.47% | |
| 💯 | 1,937 | 5.83% | |
| 🤣 | 1,488 | 4.48% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1,332 | 4.01% | |
| 😁 | 1,206 | 3.63% | |
| 👌 | 1,130 | 3.40% | |
| 🤬 | 1,048 | 3.15% | |
| 💔 | 751 | 2.26% | |
| 🤯 | 595 | 1.79% | |
| 😢 | 576 | 1.73% | |
| 🤝 | 506 | 1.52% | |
| 🤔 | 332 | 0.999% | |
| 🕊 | 326 | 0.981% | |
| 🫡 | 315 | 0.948% | |
| custom 6005608690747447506 | 222 | 0.668% | |
| 😨 | 89 | 0.268% | |
| 2 further kinds | 80 | 0.241% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 997 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 33,226 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 28 August 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @shoureshgarane. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 28 August 2026 to 4 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🔴سرنگونی آخوندها از لولهی تفنگها و ارادههای این قهرمانان است که بیرون میآید ➖تصاویری از کانونهای شورشی،واحد ارتشآزادیبخش در ایران 🔴@shoureshgarane
❤9🤝1🤣1
🔴نتایج انتخابات آمریکا نشان میدهد دموکراتها هر دو مجلس آمریکا را به دست آوردند ➖سنا: دموکراتها ۴۹ کرسی + ۲ مستقل همپیمان جمهوریخواهان ۳۹ کرسی | ۱۰ کرسی تعیینتکلیفنشده ➖مجلس نمایندگان 🔴 دموکراتها: ۱۹۲ | 🔴 جمهوریخواهان: ۱۱۳ | بلاتکلیف: ۱۳۰ 🔴@shoureshgarane
👍2❤1👏1🕊1
⭕️ #توصیه_ادمین 👌 دو دقیقه این مطلب رو بخونید ضرر نمیکنید تاریخ را ورق بزنیم تا یادمان نرود؛ تاریخ تکرار میشود، اگر از گذشته درس نگیریم! بیایید پیش از آنکه تاریخ با تکرارش به ما سیلی بزند، بار دیگر گذشته را مرور کنیم.... پیش از انقلاب ۵۷، در دوران استبداد پهلوی، مجاهدین خلق و چریکهای فدایی خلق از نیروهای انقلابی بودند که با دیکتاتوری شاه مبارزه میکردند، زندان و شکنجه میشدند و از آزادی، عدالت و برابری میگفتن…
❤21👏7custom 60059479029695171686👍5
Posted without readable text
❤16👏6👍2🤝2
⚫️خدایا، ایران ما رو از شر گوسفندان و رعیتصفتانِ چوپاندوست حفظ کن و برای همیشه دستبوسی و دیکتاتوری را به زبالهدان بفرست 🔴@shoureshgarane
👍33❤5👏4custom 60059479029695171683
⭕️⭕️ ترامپ: «آنها در حال ساخت یک سامانه ضدهوایی بودند. ما روند ساخت آن را زیر نظر داشتیم. وقتی ساخت آن تکمیل شد، دیشب به آن حمله کردیم.» #خبر_فوری #اخبارجنگ #فوری #جنگ_اقتصادی #خبرفوری #مهم
👍9custom 60059479029695171688❤3🔥2
⭕️احتمال حمله در روز چهارشنبه روزنامه نیویورک تایمز به نقل از منابع آمریکایی ادعا کرد که ارتش ایالات متحده در حال تدارک برای حمله احتمالی به ایران است. این حمله ممکن است در اولین فرصت، یعنی چهارشنبه ۴ نوامبر ۲۰۲۶ پس از انتخابات میاندورهای رخ دهد. 🔴@shoureshgarane
🤔8custom 60059479029695171686🤯4😢3
Posted without readable text
👍14custom 60059479029695171687❤6💯1
🔻شعار دانشآموزان مشهد: توپ تانک فشفشه، آخوند باید گمبشه! 🔴تظاهرات دانشآموزان در مشهد ۱۰ آبان ۱۴۰۱ 🔴@shoureshgarane
❤23👏6👍5custom 60059479029695171683
🔴ادعای وزیر اقتصاد رژیم رو بشنوید و خودتون قضاوت کنید 🔴 وزیر اقتصاد: دشمنان بارها تلاش کردهاند اقتصاد ایران را به فروپاشی بکشانند، اما این تلاشها به نتیجه نرسیده است!! 🔴@shoureshgarane
🤬17🔥6custom 60059479029695171686👍3
🔴شعارنویسی کانونهای قهرمان شورشی در ارومیه مرگ بر ستمگر چه شاه باشه چه رهبر 🔴@shoureshgarane
👍26👏4custom 60059479029695171684💯2
❤️🔥به پاکی و معصومیت بچههاست اما به سرسختی کوهنوردی که توی برف و کولاک میخواد اورست رو بزنه و هیچ جوری هم کوتاه نمیاد پس ِ پشتِ لبخندش یک عمر رنج و تلاش یک عمر دوست داشتن دیگران به خود فکر نکردن همه چیز را برای دیگران خواستن هیچ چیز برای خود نخواستن و شورش شجاعانه بر سنتها و کلیشههاست 🔴@shoureshgarane
❤32👍6💯6custom 60059479029695171683
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,295 posts we hold for @shoureshgarane. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@shoureshgarane edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
We recorded 7 posts on @shoureshgarane as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 19 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 20 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“شورشگران” (@shoureshgarane), 98,487 subscribers as measured 3 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shoureshgarane.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.