Channel
@ramscalls
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
6,058subscribers
-972 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002279192554 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ramscalls |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ramscalls |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Sept 2026, 11:21 | 6,058 | -42 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 14:25 | 6,100 | -59 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 17:46 | 6,159 | -27 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 02:12 | 6,186 | -65 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 23:18 | 6,251 | -467 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 12:54 | 6,718 | -84 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 12:38 | 6,802 | -65 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 00:38 | 6,867 | -85 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 23:14 | 6,952 | -71 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:17 | 7,023 | -7 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:31 | 7,030 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:22 | 7,030 | first reading |
100 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 13 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 100 (6 August 2026 – 19 August 2026) |
| Views total | 27,219 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 20 Aug 2026, 04:20 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Remember #01 ? I have shared at 75k, and gone to 25-30 mil lately. I think I found a similar one on RH now. Grabbing a bag here at $YUP - 171k https://dexscreener.com/robinhood/0xef602666ce95a44b8e903f95b3f715fee5a055a57302f4d3f3aaa4aa4074d48e 0x2f70500f9057660B52E5A9858e1a8075c60a12fD I also bought it via BID too, hearing good things about the team. Let's give it a try, I'll maximize my bags If It reaches to 500…
💚 MULTIPLIER DETECTED: 4x+ @ramscalls made 4x+ on DELTA. $917K ⮕ $3.68M 🔎 Call❕💍 KOL 🆖 Set custom filters and let gems come to you through our Alerts Bot 💎
Market is on fucking fire today! 🔥
I’m calling today’s token a "banger," though you should, of course, always do your own research. When I label something a banger, it means I’m getting in and calling it at the absolute earliest stage; I call it that because—based on the team and the narrative—I believe it has the potential for massive gains (tens of Xs). As I said, do your own research, too; sometimes we can be wrong. The launch time isn't set yet; …
Bought $PANTS on Ansem launchpad - dogwifpants meme from 2016 and apparently where the ‘ wif ‘ meme originally came from seems like the best wif type runner for Ansem to support on his own launchpad Ansem sent dogwifhat to 5B 200k Dyor FtateF34Xzawa91bpbVNdX72hZYo9cymRDYqBreHHbJi https://dexscreener.com/solana/6tMVLioTrzW65RWRAftNWPSf1JikYWRVsP87w9h9em2a https://t.me/thedogwifpants
🪯 DIP MODE: 2x+🔫 @ramscalls made 2x+ on PLUMBER from dip. $623K DIP ⮕ $1.34M 🔎 Call❕💍 KOL 🆖 Set custom filters and let gems come to you through our Alerts Bot 💎
Bsc/spcx reward 0xcae8f375918bf0a03d80b38cb56559aed3e37777 Robinhood coz Vlad used lenny couple times 0x85f20ba0fc7ee507becb90e0c86dcb4329e534f9
go through comments
https://x.com/coinbase/status/2089694627313971660
they are getting crazy engagement on their post
i aped plumber on base here 0xb20000000000000000000029440a9564b59129b1
123,000 views in 20 minutes Are you ready?
Showing the 12 most recent of 100 posts we hold for @ramscalls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ram’s Gems Calls ✨” (@ramscalls), 6,058 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ramscalls.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.