Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 82% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 43 days, net -433. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,812–12,375 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 17:58
11,877
-20
16 Sept 2026, 09:19
11,897
-15
14 Sept 2026, 17:55
11,912
-24
13 Sept 2026, 00:57
11,936
-19
11 Sept 2026, 03:36
11,955
-18
8 Sept 2026, 03:01
11,973
-19
4 Sept 2026, 23:36
11,992
-16
3 Sept 2026, 09:13
12,008
-11
2 Sept 2026, 02:13
12,019
-3
1 Sept 2026, 02:34
12,022
-11
31 Aug 2026, 02:49
12,033
-12
30 Aug 2026, 02:04
12,045
-6
29 Aug 2026, 05:24
12,051
-8
28 Aug 2026, 06:17
12,059
-6
27 Aug 2026, 04:18
12,065
-5
26 Aug 2026, 02:34
12,070
-10
25 Aug 2026, 03:46
12,080
-12
23 Aug 2026, 20:48
12,092
-10
22 Aug 2026, 06:17
12,102
-12
20 Aug 2026, 20:55
12,114
first reading
Engagement
41 posts held, back to 18 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
10.1%
avg views ÷ 11,877 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,200
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.34%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 41 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 August 2026
Posts held
41 (18 August 2026 – 31 August 2026)
Views total
9,577
Reactions total
128
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
2 Sept 2026, 23:14 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1h 32m
Average length
5m 07s
Measured directly from 18 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
424 reactions across 36 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
215
50.7%
👍
115
27.1%
🔥
21
4.95%
💯
15
3.54%
😡
13
3.07%
😢
11
2.59%
🙏
9
2.12%
🤯
6
1.42%
🤔
5
1.18%
😱
4
0.943%
🥰
3
0.708%
🗿
2
0.472%
😈
2
0.472%
🌚
1
0.236%
🌭
1
0.236%
🤪
1
0.236%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 36 of the 41 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 424 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 41 most recent posts we hold, published 18 August 2026 to 31 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🩸"I witnessed the rituals they perform, drinking human blood; if they had noticed my presence, they would have killed me."🩸
A few days after this statement, Princess Diana died in a strange and mysterious car accident. 💀 ☠️
👇
https://t.me/realalexjones
🔥 YOUR THOUGHTS ARE ELECTRIC. YOUR EMOTIONS ARE MAGNETIC. 🔥
You are not just a body.
You are an electromagnetic field.
The diagram shows it.
Thoughts: electric.
Emotions: magnetic.
The heart is the center of the toroidal field.
More powerful than the brain.
100,000 times stronger electrically.
Up to 5,000 times stronger magnetically.
What you think and feel every day shapes the strength of this field.
A we…
🔥 HOW DID THEY CUT THE GRANITE WITH THIS PRECISION? 🔥
Look at the temples.
The statues.
The nearly invisible joints.
They're talking to us about copper chisels.
Copper tubes.
Patience.
Where are these tools?
Why have we almost never found any?
Today, to drill granite, we use grinders, diamond crowns… and even then, it smokes.
A civilization can build an entire city in less than a thousand years.
Then disappear.
…
🔻FDA CONFIRMS SUNSCREEN ENTERS YOUR BLOODSTREAM WITHIN 24 HOURS IN 2019 THEY DID NOT RELEASE ONE PRODUCT THEY TOLD YOU TO KEEP ON APPLYING.
Six active sunscreen chemicals, including oxybenzone and avobenzone, are absorbed into the bloodstream after a single application, according to a randomized clinical trial published in JAMA in January 2020. Not years later. After one use. At 180x to 500 x the FDA own safety limi…
BELGIUM ILLUMINATI SRA SURVIVOR ANNEKE LUCAS:
Anneke Lucas is a Illuminati SRA survivor, who was sold into a murderous pedophile network in Belgium, when she was only six years old.
She was being abused and tortured daily, and was prostituted out a sex slave to numerous wealthy European elite clients.
Anneke Lucas confirms she was abused by David Rockefeller.
This is her heartbreaking story of abuse.
👇
https://t…
😱❗️ CONNECTING TWO METALS DOUBLES PLANT GROWTH: THE SECRET OF THE « TELLURIC PILE » !
💥 CAN A SIMPLE COPPER WIRE AND A ZINC NAIL REPLACE YOUR FERTILIZER ?
Imagine an inexhaustible and affordable fertilizer. It sounds like science fiction, but 100 years ago, it was already called the « telluric pile ».
❗️By creating a simple galvanic connection between two metals, you can generate electricity for free right in your…
🔴 What is this?
The images are from Spain. A professional mountaineer managed to capture a strange beam of light phenomenon after a solar eclipse. Is this an ancient dimensional portal or a simulation glitch?
👇
https://t.me/realalexjones
INTERNATIONAL CHILD SEX TRAFFICKING, ADRENOCHROME AND ORGAN HARVESTING RING ISLAND RAIDED BY FBI AND DEA
• MULTI AGENCY OPERATIONS HAVE CONFIRMED THE EXISTENCE OF A TRANSNATIONAL NETWORK OPERATING THROUGH PRIVATE ISLANDS, OFFSHORE TRANSPORT ROUTES AND CORPORATE FRONTS DESIGNED TO HIDE THE MOVEMENT OF CHILDREN, BIOLOGICAL MATERIAL AND ILLEGAL MEDICAL PROCEDURES. THIS WAS NOT A SINGLE LOCATION OR A ROGUE CELL BUT A CO…
Fauci in 2004 on the flu:
"If she got the flu for 14 days, she’s as protected as anybody can be, because the BEST vaccination is to get infected yourself. If she really has the flu, she definitely doesn’t need a flu vaccine..."
Wow...
👇
https://t.me/realalexjones
300,000.
That's how many children the United States government LOST. Not misplaced. Not temporarily separated. LOST. Released to strangers with no background checks, no follow-up, no phone call. Gone.
Read that again.
300,000 children crossed the border alone between 2021 and 2024. The government handed them to "sponsors" — people who claimed to be relatives. Many were not. Some had paid smugglers to bring the chi…
Showing the 12 most recent of 41 posts we hold for @realalexjones. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 15 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Alex Jones Infowars” (@realalexjones), 11,877 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/realalexjones.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.