Channel
@realcentral1703
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
141subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002206196122 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @realcentral1703 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/realcentral1703 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 08:40 | 141 | -1 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 15:38 | 142 | -1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 19:06 | 143 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 21:30 | 144 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:55 | 144 | first reading |
6 posts held, back to 25 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
166 reactions across 6 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 56 | 33.7% | |
| 👍 | 56 | 33.7% | |
| 🔥 | 26 | 15.7% | |
| ☃ | 9 | 5.42% | |
| 🤝 | 6 | 3.61% | |
| 👏 | 5 | 3.01% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 1.20% | |
| 💔 | 2 | 1.20% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 1.20% | |
| 💩 | 1 | 0.602% | |
| 🤡 | 1 | 0.602% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 166 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 25 August 2025 to 25 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @realcentral1703. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 6 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 August 2025 to 25 April 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🧹 Лиговка-Ямская вышла на «Добрый субботник» Сегодня Петербург снова приводил себя в порядок. На общегородской весенний субботник вышли более 200 тысяч человек: убирали дворы, парки, скверы, высаживали деревья и кустарники. Лиговка-Ямская тоже была в деле. Вместе с жителями, молодежным активом и сотрудниками МО занялись двором на Роменской, 11–13. Очистили газоны, подрезали кусты, убрали ветки и мелкий мусор. Пого…
👍9❤5👏5
📱Осваиваем MAX вместе По просьбе жителей серебряного возраста провёл встречу о том, как пользоваться мессенджером MAX. Пошагово разобрали, как установить приложение, зарегистрироваться, добавить контакты и пользоваться основными функциями. Отдельно обсудили вопросы безопасности: настройка приватности, реакция на подозрительные сообщения и защита личных данных. Главная цель таких встреч — доступность современных се…
❤12🔥9🤝6👍5👎2💩1🤡1
🎄 Дорогие жители Лиговки-Ямской! Поздравляю вас с наступающим Новым 2026 годом! Спасибо всем, кто в этом году был рядом — приходил на встречи, участвовал в субботниках, лекциях и обсуждениях. Когда район меняется — это всегда результат общей работы. Отдельная благодарность нашему старшему поколению — за мудрость, терпение и поддержку. Все проекты по благоустройству и доступной среде мы делаем и для вас в первую оче…
❤9☃7👍7
✉️ Иногда лучше написать от руки С Дворцовой площади отправил через «Новогоднюю почту» Петербургского дневника открытки с тёплыми словами двум своим бабушкам. Несмотря на звонки и мессенджеры, такие вещи по-прежнему важны. Особенно для тех, кто жил в другое время — когда письма ждали, берегли и перечитывали. Хочется, чтобы мы чаще находили время для простых знаков внимания. Для бабушек, родителей и близких. @real…
❤13👍7🔥4☃2💔2
🧹 Лиговка-Ямская на «Добром субботнике» Сегодня Петербург вышел на «Добрый субботник» — по всему городу участвовали более 150 тысяч человек. Лиговка-Ямская тоже не осталась в стороне. Мы не только убрали территорию, но и провели игры, конкурсы и флешмоб для жителей всех возрастов. С детьми поговорили об экологии — о том, как важно беречь зелёные зоны и начинать с малого: с чистоты собственного двора. Спасибо всем,…
👍19❤6🔥6💯2
⚽️ Футбол объединил Лиговку-Ямскую В выходные прошёл большой футбольный турнир нашего округа. Настоящий праздник спорта: азарт, эмоции, борьба на поле и радость за пределами площадки. С утра до вечера команды — и взрослые, и дети — показывали мастерство, сдавали нормы ГТО, участвовали в эстафетах и конкурсах. Я тоже вышел на поле вместе с коллегами-депутатами — и скажу честно: было круто сыграть бок о бок с ребятам…
❤11👍9🔥7
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @realcentral1703. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Реальный Центральный” (@realcentral1703), 141 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/realcentral1703.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.