Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ритейлер Свифт

Channel

Ритейлер Свифт

@retailerswift

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

10,807subscribers

-361 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001496216845
TypeChannel
Username@retailerswift
Created17 February 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/retailerswift

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 58% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

10,80711,16810,987.56 August 2026 — 11,168 subscribers6 August 2026 — 11,168 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,157 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,143 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,129 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,115 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,103 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,092 subscribers13 August 2026 — 11,083 subscribers14 August 2026 — 11,057 subscribers16 August 2026 — 11,042 subscribers17 August 2026 — 11,026 subscribers18 August 2026 — 11,016 subscribers19 August 2026 — 11,003 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,989 subscribers21 August 2026 — 10,976 subscribers22 August 2026 — 10,954 subscribers24 August 2026 — 10,926 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,912 subscribers26 August 2026 — 10,906 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,901 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,894 subscribers29 August 2026 — 10,892 subscribers30 August 2026 — 10,890 subscribers31 August 2026 — 10,886 subscribers1 September 2026 — 10,884 subscribers2 September 2026 — 10,873 subscribers4 September 2026 — 10,867 subscribers6 September 2026 — 10,861 subscribers9 September 2026 — 10,839 subscribers11 September 2026 — 10,824 subscribers13 September 2026 — 10,819 subscribers15 September 2026 — 10,815 subscribers17 September 2026 — 10,807 subscribers6 August 202617 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 42 days, net -361. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,753–11,222 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 13:0010,807-8
15 Sept 2026, 12:3810,815-4
13 Sept 2026, 19:3910,819-5
11 Sept 2026, 23:5710,824-15
9 Sept 2026, 14:5710,839-22
6 Sept 2026, 05:3710,861-6
4 Sept 2026, 01:4010,867-6
2 Sept 2026, 14:4610,873-11
1 Sept 2026, 16:4310,884-2
31 Aug 2026, 13:2510,886-4
30 Aug 2026, 16:4410,890-2
29 Aug 2026, 13:5610,892-2
28 Aug 2026, 14:4310,894-7
27 Aug 2026, 13:0410,901-5
26 Aug 2026, 12:0310,906-6
25 Aug 2026, 13:2810,912-14
24 Aug 2026, 11:5310,926-28
22 Aug 2026, 21:1410,954-22
21 Aug 2026, 09:5710,976-13
20 Aug 2026, 10:3210,989first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 16 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 40 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

245 reactions across 20 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍4317.6%
4217.1%
3213.1%
😁3112.7%
🔥145.71%
❤‍🔥135.31%
🤔114.49%
🤣104.08%
🎉93.67%
💯72.86%
😐62.45%
🤝52.04%
🕊41.63%
👎31.22%
🤯31.22%
20.816%
💩20.816%
🙏20.816%
🤡20.816%
🤬20.816%
2 further kinds20.816%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 245 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 February 2026 to 20 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
13
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 20 we hold a reading for · 15%
Most on one post
11
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @retailerswift. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 February 2026 to 20 February 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

20 Feb 2026, 15:46 UTC≈4,740 views10 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Video

Аналитики платежного сервиса ЮMoney подвели итоги 2025 года — и офлайн-ритейл неожиданно показал очень живую динамику. Общая сумма трат по картам в физических магазинах выросла на 42%, число транзакций — на 35%, а пользователей безналичной оплаты стало больше на 19%. Средний чек почти не изменился — 421 руб. (+5%), что говорит скорее о росте частоты покупок, чем о дороговизне. Главным драйвером осталась еда: расходы

4🔥2😐2👍1💩1

20 Feb 2026, 09:44 UTC≈4,150 views7 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

Про огурцы последние недели пишут все — и не зря. Что случилось и кто виноват? В России резко выросли цены на огурцы. По данным «Руспродсоюза», средняя розничная цена к февралю достигла около 300 руб. за кг — рост на 111% за три месяца. Минимальные цены на полке начинаются примерно от 299 руб., тогда как в отдельных магазинах ценники приближаются к 700–800 руб. Пользователи соцсетей сообщают о стоимости до 500–1000

👍2💯2🔥21

19 Feb 2026, 18:43 UTC≈3,900 views9 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Video

Снова тренды ритейла на 2026 год. На этот раз по версии Grocery Dive. Главный фон — сжатые бюджеты покупателей и рост обязательных расходов вроде медицины и страховок. Люди реже ходят по разным магазинам и стараются закрывать всё в одном месте, поэтому для сетей ключевой задачей становится не рост трафика, а удержание клиента. Давление усиливают Amazon и Walmart, которые перетягивают на себя рекламные бюджеты и усили

🔥42❤‍🔥1👍1😐1

19 Feb 2026, 15:40 UTC≈3,440 views12 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

Неужели алкогольная оттепель? @retailerswift

😁53😐2👍1👎1

19 Feb 2026, 12:13 UTC≈3,500 views11 reactions1 Starread 1 September 2026
Photo

Не очень понимаем, что именно и как считала АПЭТ. У селлера нет «единой комиссии». Есть базовый процент за категорию, а категорий — сотни. Есть логистика (которая зависит от габаритов и схемы хранения), эквайринг, платное продвижение, участие в акциях, возвраты, хранение и штрафы. У одного продавца итоговая нагрузка может быть 15%, у другого — 40%. Если это усреднённые цифры, то выглядит эффектно, но плохо отражает

🤔4❤‍🔥32👍1🤡1

19 Feb 2026, 07:22 UTC≈3,300 views9 reactions1 Starread 1 September 2026
Photo

11,5 трлн рублей — объем интернет-торговли в России в 2025 году, подсчитала АКИТ. Рост замедлился до +28% (годом ранее было +41%), но масштаб уже системный: онлайн занимает 18,8% всей розницы, а в отдельных регионах — вроде Чукотки — доля доходит до 34,5%. При этом почти весь рынок внутренний: 96% покупок совершаются внутри страны. Самая большая категория — продукты питания (2,2 трлн руб. и 18,8% онлайн-продаж). Сле

43👍1🤝1

18 Feb 2026, 18:36 UTC≈3,210 views9 reactionsread 1 September 2026

ЦБ собирается изучить, как маркетплейсы и экосистемы влияют на экономику страны. В опубликованных в феврале «Направлениях экономических исследований на 2026–2028 годы» регулятор включает платформенную экономику в число ключевых тем: от трансформации финансового рынка и конкуренции до влияния на рынок труда, платежи и роль банков. В документе говорится, что цифровые платформы создают новые бизнес-модели и финансовые

3👍32🔥1

18 Feb 2026, 16:36 UTC≈3,230 views14 reactions11 Starsread 1 September 2026

Теперь ждём от ВБ статистику: на сколько вырос спрос на ношеные колготки? @retailerswift

😁5👍3💯3🤣2🤡1

18 Feb 2026, 12:30 UTC≈3,220 views9 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

Принесли вам будничное чтиво: в интервью Shopper’s директор по развитию маркетплейса в «Лемана про» Алан Кочиев рассказал, куда компания двигает свой маркетплейс. Главное: «Лемана про» тестирует модель FBO и открывает свои склады для продавцов. Пока пилот работает в Москве, но его планируют масштабировать на регионы и подключить всех партнёров. Это позволит селлерам без собственной логистики хранить ходовые товары н

3👍3❤‍🔥21

18 Feb 2026, 07:25 UTC≈3,040 views14 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

Даже у сервиса доставки уже есть своя платежная система, а у тебя нет @retailerswift

😁7❤‍🔥4👍3

18 Feb 2026, 06:20 UTC≈3,050 views21 reactionsread 1 September 2026

В «Ведомостях» вышел ответ на колонку GR-директора Wildberries Евгения Этина: позицию торговых сетей изложил председатель президиума АКОРТ Станислав Богданов. Его главный тезис в том, что противопоставление ритейла и маркетплейсов искусственно: рынок уже омниканальный, а магазины у дома, дарксторы и ПВЗ конкурируют в одном пространстве. По данным Infoline, в 2025 году доля платформ в e-grocery достигла ~44%, у сетей

95🤯3🤬2👎1💩1

17 Feb 2026, 18:30 UTC≈3,160 views13 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

Повышение цен на алкоголь работает не одинаково для всех. Исследование НИУ ВШЭ (данные опросов более 26 тыс. россиян за 2011–2022 годы) показывает: реакция на подорожание сильно зависит от уровня дохода. Хотя акцизы и минимальные цены помогли сократить потребление с ~14,8 литров чистого спирта на человека в год в 2005-м до 10,5 к 2022-му, после 2017 года эффект ослаб, и продажи снова начали расти. Самая слабая реакц

🤔53🔥32

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @retailerswift. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Shopper’s
@newspotreb · 26,842
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 11 September 2026
Околоритейл
@okoloretail · 36,851
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 1 September 2026
Свободная касса (ритейл & e-com)
@svobodakassa · 31,551
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 6 September 2026
Русский экономизм
@russianeconomism · 76,948
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 15 September 2026
FMCG Report
@fmcg_ru · 42,998
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 29 August 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ритейлер Свифт” (@retailerswift), 10,807 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/retailerswift.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.