https://youtu.be/pyfLGRb3_4E?is=4LdcyW6mxEt8qAEq
Signed 369LeGaCy

Channel
@rhymasize
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
409subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001736000421 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @rhymasize |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 31 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 31 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/rhymasize |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 31 Aug 2026, 09:28 | 409 | +2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 11:35 | 407 | -3 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:27 | 410 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:32 | 411 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:18 | 411 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
4 reactions across 3 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🙈 | 2 | 50.0% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 25.0% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 25.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
https://youtu.be/pyfLGRb3_4E?is=4LdcyW6mxEt8qAEq
Signed 369LeGaCy
https://youtu.be/hb-gUAOyGwg?is=7QxKkrvSUMUmFyEb
Signed 369LeGaCy
https://youtube.com/shorts/pFSABltva6g?is=PG0rnJ6JKybj1CIC
Signed 369LeGaCy
Humidifier protocol: https://open.substack.com/pub/curioushumanproductions/p/the-humidifier-protocol
Signed jaxs369
Be careful of these so-called health gurus on here and other platforms selling supplements. They don’t make them, these products are made in a lab and they’re selling you pills without even knowing what’s in them. Join us now: Before Our Time📜 Recommended Channels: Click here
👍1
Signed jaxs369
https://youtu.be/13m8BmWXUy4?is=3T1uvlr0X4LzUTUd
Signed jaxs369
STUDY FINDS CANCEROUS “CANNONBALL” LUNG TUMORS DISAPPEARED AFTER HIGH-DOSE IV VITAMIN C Three advanced cancer patients experienced LONG-TERM REMISSIONS lasting up to a DECADE after receiving repeated 15–65 g IV vitamin C infusions. All of them DECLINED chemotherapy.
Signed jaxs369
Project Panama: Old Books being destroyed to be scanned into Ai?! 📕Here are some books to collect to debunk all the lies we were sold.
Signed jaxs369
Remember when the Telegraph reported this last year, that the UK government was accused of covering up data that linked to excess deaths from the Covid Vaccines (biological weapons). The Government wouldn’t release the true figures, because they thought this would lead to distress or anger of bereaved relatives if the connection were discovered. A reminder of how evil and twisted our Government truly is. https://x.…
Signed jaxs369
While Australia’s population continues to grow, that growth is now being driven overwhelmingly by immigration.— Article
Signed jaxs369
Imagine what issues pregnant women can have if it effects animals this much. Credit: zephzoid T.me/AgentsOfTruth T.me/AgentsOfTruthChatGroup
Signed jaxs369
Autism: poisoning by heavy metals, like Mercury, from the va[cci]nes T.me/Terrain_Learn
Signed jaxs369
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @rhymasize. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Rhythmasize” (@rhymasize), 409 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rhymasize.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.