Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Жукова для психологов

Channel

Жукова для психологов

@richhelping

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,060subscribers

-183 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001705650878
TypeChannel
Username@richhelping
DescriptionКанал с лучшими материалами для психологов и специалистов помогающих профессий Автор: Наталья Жукова 🎓Связаться с нами или задать вопросы о поступлении: @usp_nzh ❤️Получить помощь психологов: @zhukovahelp 📸https://instagram.com/ump_edu
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/richhelping

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 72% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

7,0607,2437,151.57 August 2026 — 7,243 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,243 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,240 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,228 subscribers14 August 2026 — 7,223 subscribers17 August 2026 — 7,215 subscribers20 August 2026 — 7,207 subscribers24 August 2026 — 7,192 subscribers27 August 2026 — 7,175 subscribers31 August 2026 — 7,161 subscribers3 September 2026 — 7,149 subscribers8 September 2026 — 7,143 subscribers12 September 2026 — 7,128 subscribers16 September 2026 — 7,124 subscribers24 September 2026 — 7,137 subscribers4 October 2026 — 7,115 subscribers10 October 2026 — 7,099 subscribers14 October 2026 — 7,112 subscribers17 October 2026 — 7,125 subscribers19 October 2026 — 7,121 subscribers23 October 2026 — 7,108 subscribers26 October 2026 — 7,107 subscribers29 October 2026 — 7,082 subscribers1 November 2026 — 7,072 subscribers4 November 2026 — 7,060 subscribers7 August 20264 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 89 days, net -183. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,033–7,270 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Nov 2026, 18:157,060-12
1 Nov 2026, 11:057,072-10
29 Oct 2026, 11:567,082-25
26 Oct 2026, 07:317,107-1
23 Oct 2026, 06:407,108-13
19 Oct 2026, 22:457,121-4
17 Oct 2026, 03:287,125+13
14 Oct 2026, 05:587,112+13
10 Oct 2026, 12:007,099-16
4 Oct 2026, 17:017,115-22
24 Sept 2026, 23:217,137+13
16 Sept 2026, 12:377,124-4
12 Sept 2026, 09:187,128-15
8 Sept 2026, 15:557,143-6
3 Sept 2026, 06:167,149-12
31 Aug 2026, 02:047,161-14
27 Aug 2026, 18:587,175-17
24 Aug 2026, 10:087,192-15
20 Aug 2026, 14:377,207-8
17 Aug 2026, 18:567,215first reading

Engagement

82 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.40%
avg views ÷ 7,060 subscribers
Avg views / post
311
23 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.56%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
23
of 82 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 20 of 23 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held82 (4 August 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total7,148
Reactions total292
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken5 Nov 2026, 22:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,480
Videos
≈183
Links
≈465

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
4m 19s
Average length
32s

Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,157 reactions across 73 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤49642.9%
🔥42636.8%
😁353.03%
❤‍🔥322.77%
🤣322.77%
💯262.25%
🥰242.07%
🙏181.56%
😍141.21%
👏131.12%
👍110.951%
🤗80.691%
🎉60.519%
👀40.346%
✍30.259%
🤩30.259%
🕊20.173%
🤝20.173%
🙈10.086%
🤔10.086%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 73 of the 82 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,157 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 82 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 23 posts held from the last 30 days (4.35%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

5 Nov 2026, 08:29 UTC239 views17 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Коллеги, подвожу итоги последних недель 💙 🔴Улетела в Вильнюс за десять дней до свадьбы. Сменить картинку, сходить в спа и наговориться с другом на много часов вперёд. 🔴Съездили с Аркашей в Красный бор, уже третий выезд за осень. У нас с ним традиция уезжать за город, чтобы создавать «островки времени» для нас 🔴Провели с командой УСП осеннюю распродажу. Открыли доступ сразу к пяти программам, и впервые собрали отде…

🔥8❤6❤‍🔥3

5 Nov 2026, 05:08 UTC334 views82 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

!! 9 дней до 🕊💍

🔥42❤31🥰9

4 Nov 2026, 15:59 UTC367 views19 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Приехала в Вильнюс на 2-3 дня 😍

🔥12❤7

4 Nov 2026, 13:45 UTC756 views28 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Ну всё, хвастаюсь! Вступительное слово к переизданию «Сверхчувствительной натуры» написала я 💙 Издательство летом этим вышло на меня с предложением, книга уже пришла из типографии, и мой экземпляр едет домой ко мне )) Рассказываю это вам не просто так. Когда вы учитесь, практикуете и говорите о себе, в какой-то момент к вам приходят сами - с предложением написать, выступить, принять участие. И это огромное поле, г…

🔥12❤6🎉6👏4

4 Nov 2026, 10:32 UTC315 views6 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Раз уж мы заговорили сегодня про решения Вот отрывок из вступительного слова к «Сверхчувствительной натуре» Элейн Эйрон - книга недавно вышла в переиздании. А теперь вопрос на внимательность: как думаете, кто написал вступительное слово? Подсказка: этого человека вы хорошо знаете 🍫

❤5🤔1

4 Nov 2026, 08:19 UTC346 views19 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

2 техники для работы с решениями, обе ставятся в начало сессии и занимают ~20-30 минут 🔴«Стратегия Жюля Верна»: когда клиент принимает важное решение, опираясь на узкий круг источников. Серия вопросов разворачивает его картину происходящего: чем он пользуется, кого читает, какой информации не хватает, кто уже решал похожие задачи 🔴«ПОВОД» (BEAM) Дэвида Дрейка: когда нужен скорее не план, а направление. Четыре опоры…

❤8🔥8🙏3

4 Nov 2026, 06:46 UTC321 views24 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Коллеги, с кем поделиться техниками для принятия решений?))

❤14🔥6✍3🙏1

3 Nov 2026, 05:14 UTC352 views2 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video

📢 Встречаемся сегодня в 12:00 и 19:00 по мск Кто не успел зарегистрироваться, добегайте: https://clck.ru/3WZ5ZY

❤2

2 Nov 2026, 12:41 UTC339 views10 reactionsread 5 November 2026

В прошлый эфир была! Прям зарядилась на действия!🔥 Буду осваивать гайды в ближайшее время! Курс приобрела. Дала себе обещание не покупать больше обучений по психологии и маркетингу, пока не пройду или хотябы не прослушаю это курс! Уже поняла, что если вы считаете, что у вас недостаточно обучения по психологии (при наличии диплома и других обучений), то это сопротивление, за которым стоят страх и стыд, а не отсутстви…

❤3👍3💯2🔥2

2 Nov 2026, 07:54 UTC329 views10 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Жуковские люли)) Пишу Оле в комментариях, а потом понимаю, что это разговор не только про неё Коллеги, смотрите, что происходит. Оля консультирует. Она знает, что надо написать программу и заняться соцсетями. Оля даже купила обучение наше. И при этом ничего не делает, называя себя ленивой, потому что веры нет И я знаю, что здесь таких много. Если у вас в голове живёт «консультирование столько не даст»/«сначала над…

💯4❤3🔥3

2 Nov 2026, 07:49 UTC288 views4 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Упираюсь в то, что надо сесть и написать программу и с ней проводить встречи с женщинами + соц.сети раскручивать. Сейчас взяла обучение по УСПешной практике, но ленивая жопа...или сил нет. Поэтому метаюсь. Будто консультирование не даст столько денег, сколько хотелось бы. Не верие в это

❤2🤝2

Showing the 12 most recent of 82 posts we hold for @richhelping. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 2 posts on @richhelping as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
4 November 2026
Most recent seen missing
4 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
28 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
2

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

1 Nov 2026, 08:09 UTCAnonymous Poll32 voters

Покликать

  1. 12:0031%
  2. 14:0016%
  3. 18:0019%
  4. 19:0013%
  5. 20:0022%
  6. Моего варианта нет, отвечу в комментариях0%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 82 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 5 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Наталья Жукова²
@NatalliaZhukova2 · 56,051
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 9 September 2026
Наташа Жукова.Рядом 🫂
@zhukova_ryadom · 27,441
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 9 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Жукова для психологов” (@richhelping), 7,060 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/richhelping.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.