Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far above this size band
42,700 average views per post against 23,076 subscribers — an engagement rate of 185.1%. Across the 21,335 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,000–31,621 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 5.84% and 23.6%, with a median of 12.1%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (6 October 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Posts measured
16 of 16 published in the window (0 exact, 16 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
683,400
Mature posts only
185.1% over 16 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 5 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
60 measurements spanning 91 days, net +2,329. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,921–23,748 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 60
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
5 Nov 2026, 11:14
23,076
+6
4 Nov 2026, 10:25
23,070
+33
3 Nov 2026, 10:41
23,037
+45
2 Nov 2026, 08:20
22,992
+23
1 Nov 2026, 05:59
22,969
+80
31 Oct 2026, 07:35
22,889
+66
30 Oct 2026, 07:48
22,823
+50
29 Oct 2026, 09:11
22,773
+59
28 Oct 2026, 06:25
22,714
+41
27 Oct 2026, 02:49
22,673
+49
26 Oct 2026, 00:36
22,624
+2
24 Oct 2026, 22:51
22,622
+27
23 Oct 2026, 22:56
22,595
+20
22 Oct 2026, 22:51
22,575
+19
21 Oct 2026, 20:34
22,556
+62
20 Oct 2026, 19:01
22,494
+79
19 Oct 2026, 16:35
22,415
+47
18 Oct 2026, 19:08
22,368
-9
17 Oct 2026, 15:39
22,377
+15
16 Oct 2026, 17:45
22,362
first reading
Engagement
49 posts held, back to 13 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 64 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
181.5%
avg views ÷ 23,076 subscribers
Avg views / post
41,900
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.362%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 49 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held
49 (13 July 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total
711,950
Reactions total
2,576
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Nov 2026, 02:25 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
173
Videos
21
Links
131
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
13m 42s
Average length
3m 26s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
6,130 reactions across 49 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
3,856
62.9%
❤🔥
867
14.1%
👍
466
7.60%
🔥
393
6.41%
😁
235
3.83%
🥰
110
1.79%
👌
107
1.75%
🤝
96
1.57%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 49 of the 49 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,130 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 49 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 9 of 17 posts held from the last 30 days (52.9%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
📣 Важное напоминание от РИКЗ
Честность на РТ — не просто правило, а основа справедливой оценки ваших знаний. Готовиться нужно самостоятельно и проверять себя без подсказок — именно так вы по-настоящему прокачаете навыки и будете уверены в своих силах на ЦЭ и ЦТ.
О том, какие нарушения 🚫фиксируются на РТ, какие последствия они влекут и почему так важен ответственный подход, — в интервью директора РИКЗ:
👉 Настаўніцк…
⚠️ РИКЗ фиксирует нарушения порядка проведения РТ
📆 Первый модуль репетиционного тестирования ещё идёт, но уже зафиксированы факты нарушения правил:
🚫участники проносили мобильные телефоны;
🚫фотографировали бланки заданий;
🚫выносили из аудиторий экзаменационные материалы и размещали их в сети интернет и социальных сетях.
Результаты тестирования таких участников аннулированы 🚫. С лицами, причастными к размещению …
📚 Пособия для подготовки к ЦЭ и ЦТ — в надёжных руках!
Тишина, конспекты, аккуратные записи и нужные пособия под рукой — именно так рождается уверенность на экзамене.
Республиканское унитарное предприятие «Издательство „Адукацыя i выхаванне“» подготовило серию пособий 📚 для выпускников и абитуриентов — теперь они доступны по ссылкам ниже.
📖 В подборке — материалы по предметам:
• «Русский язык»;
• «Физика»;
• «Хими…
🎉 Всё самое нужное — в личном кабинете РТ! 🎉
Твой личный кабинет РТ 🧑💻- это твой удобный инструмент для подготовки 👍.
Сейчас, когда первый модуль в разгаре, самое время им воспользоваться 😌.
Внутри — полезные материалы для подготовки к РЦЭ, ЦЭ и ЦТ, а также чёткие инструкции по заполнению бланка ответов 📄. Так ты сможешь не терять баллы из‑за технических ошибок.
А чтобы быстрее во всём разобраться, загляни в наш …
🤔 «А если просто глянуть ответ?» Советы от РИКЗ 🤝
Бывает, появляется мысль: «Первый модуль РТ уже идёт 🤔, в социальных сетях уже мелькают «спойлеры», «решения» и «сливы» , уже в Тик-ток опубликованы разборы тестовых заданий РТ до окончания модуля
🚫, а я просто посмотрю и запомню ответы. Внесу их в бланк и получу высокий результат 💯, и выдохну. А как мною будут гордиться родители и педагоги 👍».
Но давайте быть …
📢 Анализ типичных ошибок на ЦЭ и ЦТ как элемент методической подготовки педагога
В рамках республиканского методического семинара «Актуальные вопросы обучения истории и обществоведению» специалисты РИКЗ представили анализ результатов ЦЭ и ЦТ 2026 г. по учебным предметам «История Беларуси в контексте Всемирной истории» и «Обществоведение».
📌 Основной целью семинара было – не просто подвести итоги, а выработать стр…
📊 Неделя 1 модуля РТ позади: подводим итоги ‼️
К сожалению 🥹, проведенный РИКЗ анализ заполнения бланков показал, что отдельные участники не соблюдают указания организатора в аудитории и допускают досадные ошибки при оформлении ответов в части «В». А это напрямую влияет на корректность обработки результатов.
‼️Напоминаем ключевые правила заполнения области ответов (часть В):
✅ Ответ записывается справа от номера …
Уважаемые папы!
От имени Республиканского института контроля знаний поздравляем вас с Днём отца!
Отец — это надёжная опора семьи, мудрый наставник и пример для подражания❤️. Вы всегда на защите своих детей — и в больших, и в маленьких жизненных ситуациях. Ваше мужество и стойкость учат не отступать перед трудностями, а ваша забота и внимание помогают чувствовать себя уверенно даже тогда, когда кажется, что задач сл…
👨👩👧👦 Завтра, 21 октября, Беларусь отмечает День отца. В учреждениях высшего образования пройдут встречи со студентами в рамках Недели родительской любви.
В программах:
🔸 открытые разговоры о семье и воспитании
🔸 тематические кинопоказы
🔸 встречи с многодетными родителями, представителями БПЦ и медиками
Акция направлена на укрепление семейных ценностей и осмысление важности ответственного родительства.
Не забудь…
🎓 Три дня первого модуля РТ позади — советы от РИКЗ! 👏
За эти дни мы столько раз видели одну и ту же картину: участник всё выучил, пришёл в пункт… и вдруг вспоминает: «А ручку‑то я забыл!» 😅
Чтобы не было таких «ой», давайте честно посмотрим, что чаще всего забывают взять с собой на тестирование — и как этого избежать.
Чаще всего «остаются дома»:
🔸 Гелевая или капиллярная ручка с чернилами черного цвета🖊️ Иногда б…
📚 Вместо читательского билета — бланк ответов!
Представьте: привычная библиотека, тишина, книжные полки — и тут ты заполняешь бланк РТ.
Звучит необычно ❓, но именно в такой обстановке многим проще собраться с мыслями и потренироваться в реальных условиях.
Журналисты «СБ. Беларусь сегодня» посетили Центральную библиотеку им. Янки Купалы🥹🥹🥹, где проходило тестирование 🗒️ по русскому языку, и рассказали, как это выг…
👀 ЦТ‑2027: держите график под рукой – чтобы не пропустить ни одного дедлайна
Выше – официальный график централизованного тестирования. Сохраните пост и поставьте напоминание в календарь: организационные шаги так же важны, как и подготовка к предметам.
🗓 Регистрация – первый и обязательный шаг
• На ЦТ: с 9 по 22 апреля — не затягивайте, чтобы выбрать удобный пункт тестирования.
• На резервный день: с 8 по 11 июня – …
❤118❤🔥31👍8🤝6🔥3🥰1😁1
Showing the 12 most recent of 49 posts we hold for @rikc_by. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Республиканский институт контроля знаний” (@rikc_by), 23,076 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rikc_by.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
