Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Роман Писаревский. Яндекс Директ

Channel

Роман Писаревский. Яндекс Директ

@romapii_blog

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

602subscribers

-7 since we began measuring on 23 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001363451333
TypeChannel
Username@romapii_blog
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded23 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/romapii_blog

Topic

Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 63% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

602609605.523 August 2026 — 609 subscribers24 August 2026 — 609 subscribers31 August 2026 — 607 subscribers8 September 2026 — 603 subscribers17 September 2026 — 602 subscribers23 August 202617 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 25 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 601–610 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 01:19602-1
8 Sept 2026, 14:21603-4
31 Aug 2026, 06:13607-2
24 Aug 2026, 05:39609no change
23 Aug 2026, 10:30609first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 9 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

101 reactions across 17 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍4443.6%
🔥3635.6%
😁109.90%
98.91%
💩10.99%
🤔10.99%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 101 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 9 May 2026 to 23 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 17 we hold a reading for · 12%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @romapii_blog. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 May 2026 to 23 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

23 Aug 2026, 07:46 UTC36 views1 reactionsread 23 August 2026

Есть в работе проект - контактный зоопарк. Сложность в том, что люди НЕ покупали билет на сайте, там был привязан сторонний сервис. Нужно было прокликать несколько раз и по итогу вводить полную анкету, фио, почту, номер и короче, они просто смотрели адрес, приезжали покупали билеты на месте. Зачем покупать через сервис, если места не ограничены. По итогу реклама работает, вроде есть какой-то рост по гостям, но тол

👍1

14 Aug 2026, 17:09 UTC113 views3 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Photo

Выше писал про то что меня дико бесит РСЯ в плане того, что 1 сущность перетягивает на себя весь трафик. И все остальные объявления нихера не получают. По итогу разбил на 3 кампании в каждой по 1 заголовку и 1 картинке. И все получают пока что ровно. В одно рк еще одна конверсия не подтянулась. То есть я так реально вижу какие объявления могут плохо работать и просто отключить. Да, возможно через эксперименты прощ

👍3

30 Jul 2026, 14:32 UTC186 views3 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Photo

Как запускать РСЯ правильно давно меня пытает мысль, как правильно собирать кампании РСЯ и запускать их. Какие у нас есть варианты? 1️⃣ комбинаторные - 7 заголовков, 5 картинок в куче по итогу 35 вариантов. Если какая-то связка заголовок + картинка зацепилась за мусор и начнет масштабировать его то выходит так что это нельзя отключить. Только всю группу 2️⃣ например 3 группы в РСЯ - в группе 1 три объявления с оди

👍3

29 Jul 2026, 20:20 UTC164 views4 reactionsread 23 August 2026

Пора переходить в Макс) Завел канал. Буду там писать подробнее про проекты, работу, нейронки наверное, потому что начал уже применять ну и рассказывать как продвигаю его. Так што подписывайтесь, че как не родные https://max.ru/channel_pisarevsky

🔥3💩1

11 Jul 2026, 09:44 UTC297 views5 reactions1 Starread 23 August 2026
Photo

Привет. У меня работаю Мастера кампаний с оплатой за клики. Заявки на франшизы по 500 с копейками рублей. Так же работают с оплатой за конверсию рядом две рк. Рся запускал. Сначала пошло не плохо, около 1000 рублей заявка, но потом все слетело к херам. Деньги улетают - заявок ноль.

👍5

3 Jul 2026, 20:39 UTC285 views5 reactionsread 23 August 2026

Как Chat GPT мне холодильник чинил Короче. Тек холодильник. Раз в два дня под одной ножкой лужа. Вроде все нормально. Но течет. Мастера летом у нас вызвать нет возможности. Все на кондерах. Решил починить сам. Оказалось забилась сзади трубка которая конденсат должна сгонять в поддон. GPT провел меня прям по шагам. Ещё делаю себе пару ботов. Один - чтобы отслеживал и передавал подписки на канал в Максе в метрику.

🔥5

2 Jul 2026, 08:24 UTC266 views8 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Photo

Старый клиент. Давно не работаем. Решил зайти на аккаунт посмотреть. Бюджета у него особо не было, но он оставил включенными мастера за конверсию. И они потихоньку работают)) Прикольно. За последний месяц 5 заявок. Не плохо, если нет бюджета. У кого работает за конверсию?

🔥5👍21

29 Jun 2026, 13:52 UTC253 views4 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня начали новые проект в Яндекс Директ. Каталог франшиз. Пошли первые заявочки, пока дорого и выше планового KPI, но думаю что добьёмся нужно цели))

👍3🤔1

26 Jun 2026, 14:24 UTC232 views3 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Photo

Если вдруг вы не следите за ЧМ-2026 Кто понял, тот понял)

😁3

25 Jun 2026, 19:08 UTC212 views6 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Photo

Тоже решил побаловаться с нейросетями чтобы они помогали работать с РСЯ. Не чистка площадок. Другое. В голове конечно это всё красиво и должно работать 🤣 но скоро посмотрим в реальности. Первый тест на днях будет. Расскажите кто как играет с нейронками? Получается что-то путное? А еще за ягодами ходили)

👍5🔥1

6 Jun 2026, 13:32 UTC306 views9 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Photo

Человек 15 лет в маркетинге. Первый раз видит что можно письма на почту в Директ передавать как цель. Вот такие они маркетологи))

🔥6😁3

4 Jun 2026, 07:00 UTC294 views6 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Photo

Запустил в b2b на тест мастер кампаний за клики. И на удивление он очень хорошо начал работать. Чуть больше половины трафика идет с поиска по ЗАПРОСАМ С УПОМИНАНИЕМ БРЕНДА КОНКУРЕНТА. В b2b же как устроено, отправляют свои заявки всем подряд на почту. А там уже кто лучше предложит условия - у того и закажут. Короче, заявки по 300 рублей мне нравятся))

👍3🔥3

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @romapii_blog. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Яндекс Реклама ПРО
@yndx_ed · 56,438
Telegram ranks this channel #95 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 23 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Роман Писаревский. Яндекс Директ” (@romapii_blog), 602 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/romapii_blog.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.