Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for RONlN

Channel

RONlN

@ronin_dag

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

3,075subscribers

+20 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001460689907
TypeChannel
Username@ronin_dag
Created1 April 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ronin_dag

Growth

3,0523,0753,063.56 August 2026 — 3,055 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,055 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,052 subscribers9 August 2026 — 3,062 subscribers12 August 2026 — 3,066 subscribers15 August 2026 — 3,059 subscribers18 August 2026 — 3,064 subscribers21 August 2026 — 3,069 subscribers24 August 2026 — 3,073 subscribers28 August 2026 — 3,067 subscribers30 August 2026 — 3,066 subscribers2 September 2026 — 3,072 subscribers8 September 2026 — 3,075 subscribers6 August 20268 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 33 days, net +20. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,049–3,078 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Sept 2026, 04:373,075+3
2 Sept 2026, 22:543,072+6
30 Aug 2026, 23:193,066-1
28 Aug 2026, 05:053,067-6
24 Aug 2026, 22:383,073+4
21 Aug 2026, 12:463,069+5
18 Aug 2026, 19:373,064+5
15 Aug 2026, 17:383,059-7
12 Aug 2026, 13:343,066+4
9 Aug 2026, 17:233,062+10
7 Aug 2026, 00:453,052-3
6 Aug 2026, 11:023,055no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:493,055first reading

Engagement

27 posts held, back to 2 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 27 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
28s
Average length
28s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,317 reactions across 27 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍35827.2%
😁30423.1%
🤣27320.7%
💯15912.1%
🔥1319.95%
👎403.04%
221.67%
😱110.835%
👏60.456%
🤔60.456%
🤩60.456%
🙏10.076%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 27 of the 27 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,317 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 27 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ronin_dag. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 27 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 18:53 UTC503 views34 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Тем временем журналист Тамерлан Магомедов продолжает свой тернистый путь в сети. На сей раз поиски истины привели его к многострадальной энергетике. И вроде акценты все правильно расставлены, но... Заявлением о том, что в отрасли у нас коррупция вы никого не удивили коллега. Воруют у нас почти во всех сферах. Почему в энергетике должно быть по-другому? Тем не менее, репост дам. Очень понравилась фраза: потеем и молч

🔥19👍7🤣52👎1

7 Aug 2026, 16:20 UTC714 views46 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Случайно наткнулся в сети на одну передачу когда - то близкого для меня телеканала. Оказывается, земля наша была испокон веков и их землёй тоже. Теперь, кажется, я понимаю, под кого горы опустошают. По закону жанра они рано или поздно должны вернуться и показать нам чудеса капельного орошения. А потом мы ещё и кредиты у них брать начнём...

👍26🔥8😱5😁42🙏1

7 Aug 2026, 11:12 UTC799 views50 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Я из 90-х. И никогда не смогу понять людей, созревших в нулевые. Многие из них на самом деле нулевые...

😁30👍14🔥4👎1👏1

7 Aug 2026, 09:52 UTC831 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026

"Макс" остаётся в жизни россиян навсегда. Говорят глава Минцифры так сказал...

🤣12👎4🔥2😱1

7 Aug 2026, 06:41 UTC924 views54 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Кажется я понял, в чём причина энергетических бед республики. Подозреваю, что это дело рук сектантов тьмы из тайной организации "Свидетели Мажонцовы" . Возможно, где-то в подземелье, в глубоком бункере, оборудованном в евростиле с мягкими диванами, баром и современной системой вентиляции, сидят они себе в домашних халатах и рулят повесткой, наблюдая через гигантский экран за земными страданиями. Там грудастые официан

🤣33👍115😱4🔥1

7 Aug 2026, 02:44 UTC941 views59 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Птичий рынок (Шайтан-базар) переживал не лучшие времена. Чёрные вороны кружились над мусорными свалками, облучённые воробьи падали с оголённых проводов ветхих сетей, орлы из-за неработающих светофоров не могли взять размах, голуби лениво клевали семечки в грязных скверах... И только попугаи кричали из своих клеток надоевшие всем слова: «Усиленный режим, усиленный режим, технологический сбой, в условиях повышенного те

👍29🤣20🔥5😁32

6 Aug 2026, 21:07 UTC983 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Кто бы не пришёл % по любому останется. Может даже станет больше...

🔥15🤣4

6 Aug 2026, 10:32 UTC≈1,060 views34 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Бред сумасшедшей нацистки, пусть даже и со словами осуждения её поведения, выкладывать в сеть не стоило. Нельзя идти на поводу у провокаций. Или вы всерьёз рассчитываете на реакцию Бастрыкина? Дай то Бог, дай то Бог...

👍19💯10🔥4🤔1

6 Aug 2026, 07:34 UTC≈1,080 views56 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Позвольте вас немного поправить, коллеги. Вы совершенно правы: в республике есть нефть, но кто вам сказал, что это нефть республики? Наивно рассуждаете, слуший... Возможно, это прозвучит немного шокирующе, но у нас ещё и 17 ГЭС имеются, а свет нам почему-то отгружает Пятигорск... Так задумано. Нельзя аборигенам доверять ресурсы. Это не то чтобы «Обезьяна с гранатой», но где - то рядом... https://t.me/novoedelo/4013

💯39🔥8🤣6👍3

6 Aug 2026, 07:18 UTC≈1,070 views40 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Ну вот, стабилизировалось всё на топливном рынке, судя по отчётам профильных чиновников на совещаниях... Ходят слухи, что скоро и за общественный транспорт возьмутся. Говорят, на тех же совещаниях обсуждают введение безналичной оплаты за проезд. А это взвинтит цену процентов на 30, ведь придется платить НДС. Проезд будет стоить 45 р, но станет ли от этого на дорогах побольше новых автобусов с кондиционерами? Будут л

👍29💯5🔥3👎21

6 Aug 2026, 06:20 UTC≈1,060 views56 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Posted without readable text

🤣43😁10🔥3

6 Aug 2026, 05:48 UTC≈1,050 views32 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Чтобы окончательно запутать ситуацию, проблему всегда осложняют, начиная искать формальные причины и формального виноватого. В конечном итоге вопрос это не решает, но для громких заголовков в СМИ и подкормки жаждущей "крови" толпы хватает и такого подхода...

💯19👍9🔥3👎1

Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @ronin_dag. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Спросите у Расула
@askrasul · 94,898
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 16 August 2026
Дагестан 24/7
@dagnews24 · 36,953
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 1 September 2026
Сергей Меликов
@melikov05 · 35,283
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 2 September 2026
КРИМИНАЛЬНАЯ ХРОНИКА
@criminal_chronicle · 121,371
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 14 August 2026
МОЙ ДАГЕСТАН / Новости республики...
@moy_RD · 27,337
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 11 September 2026
Однажды в Дагестане
@o_dagestan · 34,181
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 3 September 2026
Администрация Главы РД
@agiprd · 29,084
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 8 September 2026
Что там у дагестанцев?
@dagestanRD · 84,586
Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 18 August 2026

This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“RONlN” (@ronin_dag), 3,075 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ronin_dag.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.