National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
49 measurements spanning 82 days, net +31. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 25,222–25,369 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 49
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
27 Oct 2026, 19:47
25,320
-1
26 Oct 2026, 19:08
25,321
-2
25 Oct 2026, 16:16
25,323
+3
24 Oct 2026, 16:08
25,320
+1
22 Oct 2026, 15:11
25,319
+22
21 Oct 2026, 07:39
25,297
+27
20 Oct 2026, 03:41
25,270
+31
19 Oct 2026, 00:41
25,239
-4
18 Oct 2026, 03:57
25,243
-1
17 Oct 2026, 01:11
25,244
-3
15 Oct 2026, 22:28
25,247
-13
15 Oct 2026, 01:31
25,260
-5
13 Oct 2026, 21:48
25,265
-6
10 Oct 2026, 12:59
25,271
-15
6 Oct 2026, 09:36
25,286
-14
1 Oct 2026, 09:21
25,300
-31
18 Sept 2026, 09:41
25,331
-7
15 Sept 2026, 23:40
25,338
-7
14 Sept 2026, 04:16
25,345
-7
12 Sept 2026, 10:19
25,352
first reading
Engagement
74 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 119 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
35.4%
avg views ÷ 25,320 subscribers
Avg views / post
8,950
29 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.458%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
29
of 74 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 26 of 29 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 October 2026
Posts held
74 (20 July 2026 – 25 October 2026)
Views total
259,570
Reactions total
1,058
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
28 Oct 2026, 00:12 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,390
Videos
≈1,050
Links
≈888
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 28 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
11m 24s
Average length
1m 08s
Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3,279 reactions across 68 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,132
34.5%
👍
748
22.8%
💯
325
9.91%
🔥
240
7.32%
😱
171
5.22%
🤯
149
4.54%
👏
93
2.84%
🙊
72
2.20%
👌
65
1.98%
👀
58
1.77%
✍
39
1.19%
😨
39
1.19%
💔
38
1.16%
😎
31
0.945%
⚡
20
0.61%
🕊
18
0.549%
🏆
13
0.396%
👨💻
11
0.335%
🫡
9
0.274%
🙏
6
0.183%
1 further kind
2
0.061%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 69 of the 74 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,279 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 74 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 25 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
По сообщениям жителей г. Дербент, люк у дома на пр-те Агасиева 13г течет с ночи 23.10., жители неоднократно обращались в водоканал через экстренную службу, но реакции не последовало.
Ситуация привычная, когда улицы наполняются водой, держится ужасный запах, а реакция заставляет себя очень долго ждать.
⚡️⚡️⚡️
Сегодня заключен под стражу бывший заместитель главы города (начальник Управления ЖКХ г.Каспийска), причастный к превышению должностных полномочий (ч.3 ст. 286 УК РФ).
Каспийский городской суд рассмотрел ходатайство следствия об избрании меры пресечения в отношении обвиняемого в совершении преступления, предусмотренного ч.3 ст. 286 УК РФ.
Из поступившего в суд материала следует, что обвиняемый, занимая должн…
«Уважаемый Министр МВД Абдурашид Магомедович, Уважаемый руководитель следственного комитета РД, Уважаемый директор ФСБ РД, Уважаемый Прокурор РД, Начальник департамента ГУСБ МВД России Макаров А.И., прошу Вас обратить внимание на сотрудника полиции, а именно ОРЧ СБ Муртузалиева Муртуза Омаровича, проводящий служебные расследования и привлекающий сотрудников полиции к дисциплинарной ответственности, а иногда выявляющи…
Возникает закономерный вопрос: на каком основании проигнорировано частное определение суда? Почему материал, поступивший из прокуратуры, не получил должной процессуальной оценки? Или для возбуждения дела требуется нечто большее, чем прямое указание суда на признаки преступления?
Не менее странная ситуация складывается с уголовным делом № 12401820005000263, возбужденным 27 июня 2024 года по ч. 3 ст. 159 УК РФ в отноше…
Земельные участки в Дербенте: подложные выписки, дело без обвиняемых и вопросы к следствию
В Дербенте продолжается история вокруг незаконного оформления земельных участков. Несмотря на возбужденное уголовное дело и судебные решения, указывающие на признаки преступления, следствие до сих пор не может определить виновных. В правоохранительные органы направлено множество заявлений с просьбой провести проверку и дать оц…
К сожалению, личность девиантного преступника Гаруна Джалилова не является исключением из числа сотрудников ОСБ МВД РД, а представляет собой один из актуальных и распостраненных случаев недопустимого пребывания в должности и на службе в данном подразделении Министерства внутренних дел РД лиц с аналогичным бэкграундом.
О них, о таких же сотрудниках ОСБ МВД РД, и наши последующие публикации.
«Позор для ОРЧ СБ МВД по РД: Как наркоман-шантажист дискредитирует внутреннюю безопасность Дагестана одним своим присутствием
Собственная безопасность МВД создавалась как элитный надзорный орган, «санитар леса» и щит системы от внутренних пороков.
Сотрудники этого подразделения априори должны быть эталоном честности, а их репутация — безупречной. Но, судя по всему, в Дагестане эти правила работают избирательно.
Ярки…
Строительный и иной бизнес Джавадова, сопряжённый с криминалом, из которого, по фиговому листку декларации, он официально вышел, его административный ресурс на официальной должности председателя Собрания депутатов г. Каспийск, связи и теневые договоренности, его торгашеский интеллектишко и суть его преступных занятий, в симбиозе стали залогом его будущего ареста.
Джавадов А., желавший решать в г. Каспийск кадровые в…
❤33👏14👌7💯1😱1🙊1
Showing the 12 most recent of 74 posts we hold for @antipod_rd. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 14 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Спросите у Расула @askrasul · 95,186 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 16 August 2026
МВД по Республике Дагестан @mvd_dagestan · 25,060 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 14 September 2026
Кавказ Правда @skfo_KP · 22,986 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 19 September 2026
ЮГ России Сейчас @yg_rossii_seichas · 20,355 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 26 September 2026
КРИМИНАЛЬНАЯ ХРОНИКА @criminal_chronicle · 120,026 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 14 August 2026
@chernovik.net @chernovik · 48,710 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 26 August 2026
МЧС (Махач, Чё Стало?) @ushanka05 · 20,527 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 27 September 2026
ЧП Дагестан @chp_05 · 90,434 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 17 August 2026
Куда пойти в Дагестане. @kuda_poiti_dagestan · 21,604 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 20 September 2026
Сергей Меликов @melikov05 · 34,333 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 2 September 2026
КАЙФ Дагестана / новости Дагестана, Махачкалы @KAIF_dagestana3 · 42,634 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 28 August 2026
05.tv @O5_tv · 22,392 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 20 September 2026
Правительство Дагестана @pravitelstvord · 23,536 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 18 September 2026
МОЙ ДАГЕСТАН / Новости республики... @moy_RD · 26,785 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 11 September 2026
Администрация Главы РД @agiprd · 28,929 Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 8 September 2026
Что там у дагестанцев? @dagestanRD · 84,474 Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 18 August 2026
КРИК НАРОДА @kriknarodard · 19,286 Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 3 October 2026
Дагестанские известия @dagizvestiya · 25,869 Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 13 September 2026
Дагестан 24/7 @dagnews24 · 36,557 Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 1 September 2026
Минобрнауки РД @minobrnauki_rd · 18,747 Telegram ranks this channel #87 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 4 October 2026
РГВК «Дагестан» @RGVKDAGESTAN · 21,775 Telegram ranks this channel #89 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 22 September 2026
Новости ННТ @newsnnt · 19,560 Telegram ranks this channel #92 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 30 September 2026
This channel appears in 22 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Антипод. Дагестан” (@antipod_rd), 25,320 subscribers as measured 27 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/antipod_rd.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.