Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
10 measurements spanning 30 days, net -48. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,114–2,176 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Sept 2026, 12:18
2,121
-6
12 Sept 2026, 20:22
2,127
-4
9 Sept 2026, 02:01
2,131
-11
3 Sept 2026, 10:46
2,142
-9
30 Aug 2026, 20:15
2,151
-5
27 Aug 2026, 15:43
2,156
-1
24 Aug 2026, 23:54
2,157
-8
21 Aug 2026, 17:28
2,165
-3
18 Aug 2026, 08:36
2,168
-1
17 Aug 2026, 21:15
2,169
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 15 February 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
35 reactions across 13 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
😁
10
28.6%
👍
9
25.7%
❤
5
14.3%
🔥
4
11.4%
🤔
3
8.57%
😱
2
5.71%
👏
1
2.86%
🤩
1
2.86%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 35 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 February 2025 to 7 August 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Bitcoin 125.000 dolara yükselirse, 18 milyar doları aşan short pozisyon tasfiye olabilir. 105.000 dolara düşerse 10 milyar doları aşan long pozisyon tasfiye olabilir.
Peki sizce ne olacak?
125.000$’a yükselir ✅52%
105.000$’a düşer ❌36%
Her ne olursa olan bize olur 😂12%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
📊 Hyperliquid platformu, Temmuz 2025’te blokzincir gelirlerinde zirvede! 🔥
VanEck’in son raporuna göre:
🔹 Hyperliquid, tüm ağlar genelinde toplanan ücretlerin %35’ini tek başına oluşturdu 🌐💰
🔹 Bu etkileyici performans, protokolün güçlü ivmesini ve artan kullanımını yansıtıyor 📈⚙️
📢🚀 Bitcoin Piyasa Güncellemesi – 8 Mart 2025 📢🚀
Merhaba Kripto Severler! 🤑📈 Bitcoin şu anda 86.100$ seviyesinde işlem görüyor ve son 24 saatte %3,5 değer kaybetmiş durumda. Piyasa değeri 1,71 trilyon dolar seviyesinde bulunuyor. Teknik göstergeler satış yönünde sinyal veriyor; RSI 41.22 ile satış bölgesinde, MACD -623.1 ile negatif bölgede ve hareketli ortalamalar düşüş eğilimini destekliyor. Önemli destek seviyeler…
SEC, Coinbase'e karşı açtığı davayı geri çekerek tüm davalara son verdi.
Bu hamle, Gensler yönetimindeki yaptırıma dayalı düzenlemeden daha şeffaf ve işbirliğine dayalı bir yaklaşıma geçişin sinyallerini veriyor.
Consensys, Robinhood, Gemini, Uniswap ve OpenSea'ye karşı açılan davalar da reddedildi. Bir Kripto Görev Gücü şu anda politika reformlarına öncülük ediyor.
🚨 Son 24 Saatte Piyasada Büyük Likidasyon! 🚨
💰 $379M likide oldu!
📉 148,933 trader piyasadan silindi.
Piyasadaki bu düşüş, yatırımcıları tedirgin etti. Birçok kişi, bunun bir ayı piyasasının habercisi olup olmadığını sorguluyor.
Total dominance’ta geri çekilme yaşandı. Ancak daha kötü senaryoları konuşmak için erken olabilir.
📊 Piyasa yapısını ve likidite akışını dikkatle izlemek gerekiyor.
Stablecoin bankası 0xinfini hacklendi ve 49,5 milyon dolarlık USDC çalındı.
Hacker 49,5 milyon USDC'yi 49,5 milyon DAI ile değiştirdi ve 17.696 adet ETH satın aldı.
Galiba bu boğayı hacker’lar başlatacak 😂
BTC.D Günlük Güncelleme
📉 Likidite boşalmasının ardından düşüş trendi devam ediyor, %59'a doğru geri çekilme potansiyeli var.
📉 Destek seviyeleri: %59 (günlük) ve 4H'de kıymetli alan. Bu devam ederse altcoin'ler rahatlama görebilir.
🚀 BTC.D yükselirse, %66.4 - %67.6 aralığı anahtar reaksiyon bölgesi olup, altcoinlere baskı yapabilir.
Günaydın ☃️
—
ETH'nin fiyatı, önemli bir destek seviyesi olan 2.550'nin üzerinde tutunuyor.
📍 Potansiyel ilk direnç: 2.900
📍 Alıcı kümesi: 2.550, ancak yeniden testler desteği zayıflatabilir ve 2.450'ye doğru yolu açabilir.
2.900 seviyesinin üzerine çıkılması durumunda 3.150 - 3.500 aralığında bir tepki oluşabilir.
—
Bitcoin'in fiyatı, önemli bir seviye olan Önceki Aylık Açılış (PMO) tarafından destekleniyor.
…
👍3🤩1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @roninlegion. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Bitcoin 125.000 dolara yükselirse, 18 milyar doları aşan short pozisyon tasfiye olabilir. 105.000 dolara düşerse 10 milyar doları aşan long pozisyon tasfiye olabilir.
Peki sizce ne olacak?
125.000$’a yükselir ✅52%
105.000$’a düşer ❌36%
Her ne olursa olan bize olur 😂12%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 February 2025 to 7 August 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
HASOsyalmedya @HSNmedya · 37,976 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 31 August 2026
EU Haber 🦅 @eaglesuniontr · 23,853 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 17 September 2026
Ninja News @ninjanewstr · 87,490 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 17 August 2026
Lepublic @LePublic00 · 24,237 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 16 September 2026
Selcoin Resmi Duyuru Kanalı @selcoin · 27,955 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 10 September 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ronin Legion” (@roninlegion), 2,121 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/roninlegion.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.