Arkadaşlar, #Bitcoin desteği 80.000$ altonda günlük kapanış yağmadığı sürece sorun yok ama altında kapanış yaparsa risk yüksek. Altcoinler ne olursa olsun ucuz am bitcoinin anlık hareketlerinden etkilendikleri için günlük işlem yapanlar 80k altına düşerse dikkat etmeleri gerekir🍀

Channel
Lepublic
@LePublic00
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
25,797subscribers
+1,680 since we began measuring on 17 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001483402191 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @LePublic00 |
| Description | Paylaşımlarım yatırım tavsiyesi değildir. Yoğun talepten dolayı yaptığım işlemleri paylaşıyorum. |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 17 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 41 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 27 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/LePublic00 |
Topic
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Oct 2026, 16:50 | 25,797 | +2,635 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 18:19 | 23,162 | -36 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 16:47 | 23,198 | -34 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 18:39 | 23,232 | -34 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 20:27 | 23,266 | -17 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 21:29 | 23,283 | -64 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 16:00 | 23,347 | -36 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 15:38 | 23,383 | -64 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 11:57 | 23,447 | -35 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 14:40 | 23,482 | -43 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 13:20 | 23,525 | -49 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 15:18 | 23,574 | -42 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 18:21 | 23,616 | -27 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 19:57 | 23,643 | -73 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 14:34 | 23,716 | -88 |
| 9 Oct 2026, 14:17 | 23,804 | -100 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 04:18 | 23,904 | -97 |
| 28 Sept 2026, 15:16 | 24,001 | -236 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 21:41 | 24,237 | -46 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 16:17 | 24,283 | first reading |
Engagement
118 posts held, back to 26 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 78 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 18.1%
- avg views ÷ 25,797 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 4,680
- 31 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 31
- of 118 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 118 (26 June 2026 – 27 October 2026) |
| Views total | 145,066 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Oct 2026, 00:03 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈2,360
- Links
- ≈833
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 28 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Recent posts
İyi akşamlar arkadaşlar , yarın Fed Faiz Kararı açıklanacak. Ondan öncesinde altın, gümüş ve nasdaq güzel fırsatlar yarattı ve kazanarak ilerliyoruz. Yarın faiz sabit kalacak bununla beraber bir sonra ki toplantı da artış bekliyoruz piyasaya şahin tutumla beraber yansımaları net bir şekilde göreceğiz🍀 https://t.me/lepublicglobalpiyasalar
Arkadaşlar, altın 4.000$ hedefime geldi oradan tepki almasaydı 3800$ a kadar direk düşerdi yeniden 4.000$ üstüne attı 4.240$ a kadar da yolu var. O seviyeleri test edip yeniden satış yerse 3.800$ ı test eder🍀
Kanalda olan arkadaşlar da dahil🍀
https://x.com/lepublichalk/status/2114788730762633482?s=52&t=b7roccWz9ysfiMo4C8uqEA
#Bitcoin sıkıntılı bölgenin altında umarım kısa sürede 80k üstüne çıkar yoksa satış baskısı artacaktır🍀
#Bitcoin 80.000$ desteğinin altına kısa süreli düştü geri yükseldi 80k altı günlük kapanış yapmamalı çok riskli bir bölge🍀 #Altın 4.000$ altında haftayı kapattı 4.200$ ihtimali var fakat 3.800$ bence daha yüksek ihtimali🍀
Altın 4.000$ a düştü beklediğim seviye buydu. 4250$ üstü olmadıkça 3800$ ı da test edecektir🍀
#Bitcoin 80.000$ altına düşmemeli düşerse bekleme süremiz biraz daha uzar🍀
Altında 4.000$ geliyor beklentime ulaştıktan sonra yeni hedef belirleyeceğim.🍀
Altcoinler düşor ardından toparlıyor bunun tek bir açıklaması var akümülasyon bu süreç 2 yıl falan sürüyor bu defa 4 yıla yakındır piyasa akümüle oluyor. Sonlarındayız bence🍀
Arkadaşlar, Bitcoin'de 80.000$ altı riskli bölge. Bu seviyenin üstünde sorun yaşamayız ama altında kapanışlar yaparsa 60.000$ ihtimali doğar bu sebepten günlük işlem yapanlar bu seviyeyi dikkate almalı🍀
Showing the 12 most recent of 118 posts we hold for @LePublic00. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Sizce yeni alım yapayım mı?
- Alım yap56%
- Beklemede kal45%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
#Bitcoin yön beklentiniz nedir?
- Aşağı ⬇️56%
- Yukarı⬆️45%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 118 most recent posts we hold, published 26 June 2026 to 27 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@kriptomessitg · 53,223#1
@theKriptolik · 16,430#2
@BarisKardes · 7,426#3
@sirgraywolf_trade · 5,230#4
@bitcoin_meraklisi · 14,992#5
@ArtoteFinans · 3,991#6
@evoxanaliz · 8,274#7
@JustTradeGrup · 4,176#8
@magofmemes · 5,581#9
@burak_tamac · 13,873#10
@sjwgem · 2,638#11
@cryptoquant_turkish · 5,232#12
@HoodiesChannel · 5,093#13
@mrtraderkripto · 11,193#14
@crpyomag · 10,367#15
@TraderOmerPublic · 13,961#16
@gorkeutrade · 7,619#17
@cryptomonsterCM · 7,116#18
@JessCoinResmi · 7,083#19
@roninlegion · 2,077#20
@kazancrehberiduyuru · 1,539#21
@yoyowla · 83,406#22
@paradotor_1 · 83,853#23
@eaglesuniontr · 23,619#24
@yoyodexhaber · 39,354#25
@mikabotSinyal · 5,360#26
@cryptotroia · 63,375#27
@uzmancoin · 29,260#28
@eaglesunion · 7,443#29
@AstronomicaNews · 8,315#30
@justpossibilities · 5,640#31
@mikabotChannel · 11,183#32
@evoxwhale · 3,941#33
@paramatik11 · 20,684#34
@TheProjectZone · 1,971#35
@HSNmedya · 37,689#36
@VolumeMachine · 4,126#37
@misstraderanaliz · 13,230#38
@ustadsplinterbilgi · 5,545#39
@selcoin · 27,397#40
@BWEnews_TR · 1,952#41
@coinmuhendisihaber · 39,588#42
@paralognews · 1,722#43
@eaglesunionp2e · 1,311#44
@vucafightclub · 3,769#45
@CryptoMeTugce · 9,473#46
@analizglobal · 4,357#47
@coinotag · 21,930#48
@SYILDIZ2017 · 5,480#49
@islekborsa · 11,638#50
@ChartistsTradee · 3,652#51
@FinansaIozgurlukakademisi · 6,601#52
@Muhabbit · 2,451#53
@numanonatduyuru · 6,929#54
@AirdropMuhendisim · 17,576#55
@BixxiCrypto · 423#56
@alp_isik · 4,692#57
@coinkolik · 8,696#58
@bnaizi · 16,561#59
@firatluxTG · 2,500#60
@turkerbalkarkanali · 2,775#61
@evoxsniper · 2,129#62
@thebull_crypto · 172,683#63
@RuesAnnouncement · 4,166#64
@bpthaber · 345,692#65
@TURKINFORMmedya · 19,214#66
@CoinSonarV2 · 26,454#67
@whale_alert_io · 296,860#68
@WhaleSniper · 59,515#69
@cryptoquant_alert · 70,250#70
@ibrahimhaskologlu · 103,194#71
@CryptoCapoTG · 116,357#72
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 16 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@kriptomessitg · 53,223
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 23 August 2026
@CoinGenzo · 20,614
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 26 September 2026
@selcoin · 27,397
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 10 September 2026
@HSNmedya · 37,689
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 31 August 2026
@paradotor_1 · 83,853
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 17 August 2026
@eaglesuniontr · 23,619
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 17 September 2026
@coinmuhendisianaliz · 28,888
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 8 September 2026
@iskender07 · 28,670
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 27 September 2026
@paramatik11 · 20,684
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 25 September 2026
@uzmancoin · 29,260
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 7 September 2026
@AlgoRhytm · 20,646
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 25 September 2026
@ninjanewstr · 85,849
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 17 August 2026
@cryptotroia · 63,375
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 21 August 2026
@yoyodexhaber · 39,354
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 30 August 2026
@yoyowla · 83,406
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 18 August 2026
@gundem360 · 23,877
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 15 September 2026
@binancesignalsturkeyyyy · 20,249
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 26 September 2026
This channel appears in 17 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Lepublic” (@LePublic00), 25,797 subscribers as measured 27 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LePublic00.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.