Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 48% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
60 measurements spanning 91 days, net -941. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,158–13,381 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 60
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Nov 2026, 22:19
12,299
-5
5 Nov 2026, 21:10
12,304
-55
4 Nov 2026, 22:11
12,359
-7
3 Nov 2026, 23:06
12,366
-6
2 Nov 2026, 22:08
12,372
-10
1 Nov 2026, 21:46
12,382
-17
31 Oct 2026, 21:35
12,399
-16
30 Oct 2026, 20:20
12,415
-17
29 Oct 2026, 19:11
12,432
-20
28 Oct 2026, 16:00
12,452
-2
27 Oct 2026, 17:17
12,454
-13
26 Oct 2026, 19:17
12,467
+8
25 Oct 2026, 16:00
12,459
-1
24 Oct 2026, 18:47
12,460
-11
23 Oct 2026, 21:20
12,471
-5
22 Oct 2026, 21:41
12,476
-9
21 Oct 2026, 16:14
12,485
-17
20 Oct 2026, 13:19
12,502
-27
19 Oct 2026, 12:08
12,529
-3
18 Oct 2026, 14:31
12,532
first reading
Engagement
54 posts held, back to 13 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 56 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
4.67%
avg views ÷ 12,299 subscribers
Avg views / post
574
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.228%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 54 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 6 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held
54 (13 July 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total
3,446
Reactions total
4
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Nov 2026, 07:35 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
406
Videos
37
Links
89
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
7s
Average length
7s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
15 reactions across 12 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
10
66.7%
🤯
3
20.0%
🌚
1
6.67%
👍
1
6.67%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 54 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 15 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 54 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 6 posts held from the last 30 days (33.3%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
‼️МЫ ДОБАВИЛИ КОЛЕСО ФОРТУНЫ И ПОДАРКИ‼️
Что можно выбить🚀
Скидка на подписку 50%
6 месяцев подписки
7 дней подписки
+1 устройство
1 месяц подписки
+10 гб обхода глушилок
14 дней подписки
Легендарный Дроп 🤩
5К💸
20К💸
Секретный приз 🤔
IPhone 17 pro🤯
⚡️Что нужно делать чтобы прокрутить колесо. Есть 2 варианта.
🔥1 способ.
Купить подписку на 3 месяца = 1 прокрут
Купить подписку на 6 месяцев = 2 прокрута
Купить подпис…
⚡️⚡️ ВЫШЕЛ НОВЫЙ МИШКА!
Только что вышел новый безлимитный 🎁 Мишка за 50 звезд!
Купить дёшево звёзды @taylerstarsbot
Дешёвый vpn с обходом @taylervpnbot
@ronsiwiw
‼️БИНАНС ВЗЛОМАЛИ‼️
Сообщается, что только что хакеры взломали самую крупную в мире криптобиржу Binance на $5,6 миллиарда!
Пизда?
Купить дешево звезды @taylerstarsbot
Дешевый VPN с обходом @taylervpnbot
@ronsiwiw
☄️☄️ БЕСПЛАТНОЕ УДАЛЕНИЕ ПОДАРКОВ!
В бетке Telegram на Android уже завезли удаление подарков из профиля — и оно будет бесплатным:
➖ Можно удалять только безлимитные подарки — лимитки удалить нельзя.
➖ Безлимитные подарки в каналах — можно удалить.
➖ Подарки, полученные от ботов — можно удалить.
При этом вы не получите никакой компенсации за удаление подарка!
Купить дешево звезды @taylerstarsbot
Дешевый VPN с об…
🤩Сегодня нами всем любимым Павел Дуров празднует свой 42 день рождения‼️
😉Желаю ему здоровья, процветания telegram и gram.
Поздравим его🥳
Купить дёшево звёзды @taylerstarsbot
Дешёвый VPN с обходом @taylervpnbot
@ronsiwiw
⚡️ ХОЛДЕРЫ НАЧАЛИ СЛИВАТЬ PLUSH PEPE?
Самый крупный холдер 🎁 Plush Pepe @kallen за последние пару часов распродал сразу 11 Пепок!
🥰 Забрал их у него другой крупный холдер гифтов, который уже пытается их флипнуть себе в плюс — @rasul...
Всего у @kallen на балансе остается еще около 180 штук.
Купить дёшево звёзды @taylerstarsbot
Дешвый VPN с обходом @taylervpnbot
@ronsiwiw
‼️ ВЫШЛИ УЛУЧШЕНИЯ НА ЛАМПУ!
Только что вышли новые улучшения на Mirage Lamp:
Купить дешёвые звёзды @taylerstarsbot
Дешёвый VPN с обходом @taylervpnbot
@ronsiwiw
☄️☄️ТВОЙ ТЕЛЕГРАМ РЕЙТИНГ СТАЛ ВЫШЕ!
Только что Telegram обновил подсчет рейтинга — количество заработанных звезд было пересчитано, и ваш рейтинг мог изменится!
🤯 Продажа подарков больше не снимает очки рейтинга — вам вернули всё, что списали ранее, когда люди продавали ваши гифты!
Купить дёшево звёзды @taylerstarsbot
Дешвый впн с обходом @taylervpnbot
@ronsiwiw
😱 ШКОЛЬНИКИ АТАКУЮТ ДЕВОЧЕК РАДИ ПОДАРКОВ!
Сообщается, что группа школьников устраивает охоту на девочек с NFT-гифтами — находят её, пробивают через ботов ФИО и требуют отдать подарки...
🤯 Если не идёт на поводу — начинают травить, писать родителям, клеветать. Если и это не помогает — травля переходит в офлайн: видео под дверью квартиры и прочие угрозы.
На данный момент аккаунты и канал мошенников заблокированы и …
☄️ МЕГА-ОБНОВА КРУЖКОВ В ТЕЛЕГРАМ!
В новой бета-версии Telegram для Android появилась новая вкладка с настройками записи кружков!
Теперь можно будет настроить:
➖ Качество: 360p или 480p
➖ Разрешение камеры: высокое, среднее или низкое
➖ Частота кадров: 30 или 60 FPS
➖ Битрейт видео: от 750 кбит/с до 2 Мбит/с
➖ Кружки можно сделать квадратными!
Купить дёшево звёзды
@taylerstarsbot
VPN с обходом @taylervpnbot
@ro…
⚡️ ИСТОРИЧЕСКИЙ МАКСИМУМ У 25 ПОДАРКОВ!
Ловите список гифтов, которые прямо сейчас находятся на своих исторических максимумах — и всё это за 3 месяца!
Купить звёзды дешёвые @taylerstarsbot
Дешёвый VPN с обходом @taylervpnbot
@ronsiwiw
Showing the 12 most recent of 54 posts we hold for @ronsiwiw. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@ronsiwiw edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
20 August 2026
Most recent edit
20 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@ronsiwiw named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@taylervpbbot named in 7 posts, 8 August 2026 – 1 September 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Digital Cryptocosmos @digitalcryptocosmos · 26,577 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 8 September 2026
A5 Investment Token - EN @investdmt · 139,875 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 29 August 2026
ISH | о крипте @ishcryptoo · 30,832 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 8 September 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ronsiwiw” (@ronsiwiw), 12,299 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ronsiwiw.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.