Film & TV — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 75% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
16 measurements spanning 50 days, net +300. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,817–7,209 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
25 Sept 2026, 05:59
7,164
+94
16 Sept 2026, 18:16
7,070
+11
12 Sept 2026, 23:15
7,059
+66
9 Sept 2026, 07:57
6,993
+17
3 Sept 2026, 18:00
6,976
+38
31 Aug 2026, 17:28
6,938
-15
28 Aug 2026, 07:44
6,953
+17
25 Aug 2026, 10:53
6,936
-5
22 Aug 2026, 16:44
6,941
+4
19 Aug 2026, 08:55
6,937
+10
16 Aug 2026, 19:34
6,927
+10
13 Aug 2026, 17:58
6,917
+28
10 Aug 2026, 08:51
6,889
+27
6 Aug 2026, 22:58
6,862
-2
6 Aug 2026, 16:40
6,864
no change
6 Aug 2026, 16:39
6,864
first reading
Engagement
26 posts held, back to 6 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 26 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
4m 58s
Average length
4m 58s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
151 reactions across 20 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
84
55.6%
👍
25
16.6%
👏
14
9.27%
🔥
14
9.27%
🎉
7
4.64%
🤝
6
3.97%
👀
1
0.662%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 151 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
نظرسنجی بسته شد ✅
۶۱ نفر رأی دادید ۸۴٪ گفتید بله
پس تصمیم گرفته شد: سری «آدمخواران» ژان تولی ساخته میشود.👍😍
ویدیوها کوتاه، بدون اسپویل، و کاربردی خواهند بود همان چیزی که خواستید.
ویدیوی اول رفت روی میز ساخت. 🎬
ممنون که همراهید.❤️
آدمخواران» ژان تولی را در چند ویدیوی کوتاه و بدون اسپویل بررسی کنیم؟
🔥 آره! خیلی کنجکاوم57%
🤨بله، اگر کوتاه و کاربردی باشد28%
❌ فعلاً نه، محتوای دیگری اولویت دارد21%
The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🚩«آدمخواران» ژان تولی، بازسازی یک واقعهی واقعی است: فرانسهی ۱۸۷۰، یک بعدازظهر تابستان، یک روستا و مردی که زنده از میان جمعیت بیرون نمیآید.
نه قاتلی در کار است، نه توطئهای.😲
فقط یک جمعیت و کاری که هیچکدامشان بهتنهایی نمیکردند.🌶
📌میخواهم در چند ویدیوی کوتاه و بدون اسپویل، همین را بررسی کنیم
💡چطور فردیت در جمع محو میشود؟
😥چطور خشونت عادیسازی میشود؟
و چطور مسئولیت اخلاقی آنقدر بین همه پخش میشود که در نه…
💣 اگر میخواهی روانشناسی را از پایه، علمی و کاربردی یاد بگیری، این فرصت را از دست نده!
🧠 دوره جامع روانشناسی عمومی (هیلگارد)
💥آموزش آنلاین + آفلاین
🎥 36 ساعت آموزش
👩🎓استاد: فائزه جمالی
💰 فقط 1میلیون و 800 هزار تومان
🔄با ثبتنام در این دوره، علاوه بر آموزش کامل روانشناسی عمومی، از مزایای زیر هم بهرهمند میشوی:
🏃♂️ اشتراک ۳ ماهه
🏃♂️ دسترسی به ۱۰ هزار ساعت کارگاه تخصصی روانشناسی
🏃♂️ آموزش آنلاین و آفلاین؛ ت…
🎥 دوره آبزرویشن (مشاهده بالینی)
🛑اتاق درمان را از نزدیک تجربه کنید؛ از مشاهده تا تحلیل تخصصی
در دوره آبزرویشن مدرسه روانبُنه، با مشاهده زنده یک کیس درمانی و تحلیل تخصصی آن با رویکرد روابط ابژه، فرصت خواهید داشت فرآیند درمان را همانگونه که در عمل رخ میدهد، ببینید، درک کنید و درباره آن بیاموزید.
✨ ویژگیهای دوره:
🔹 مشاهده زنده کیس درمانی
🔹 تحلیل و بحث تخصصی پس از جلسه
🔹 آموزش با رویکرد روابط ابژه
🔹 اعطای گواهی معتب…
💣 اگه میخوای CBT رو اصولی و کاربردی یاد بگیری، این فرصت رو از دست نده!
🧠 دوره جامع درمان شناختی رفتاری (CBT)
👨🏫تدریس: دکتر هانی رحیمی
🎥 ۱۰۰ ساعت آموزش آفلاین
😀فقط ۱ میلیون و ۸۰۰ هزار تومان
با ثبتنام در این دوره، فقط یک کلاس نمیخری؛
به یک مجموعه آموزشی کامل دسترسی پیدا میکنی:
✅اشتراک ۳ ماهه
✅ دسترسی به ۱۰ هزار ساعت کارگاه تخصصی روانشناسی
✅ مدرک معتبر از وزارت علوم، تحقیقات و فناوری
✅ آموزش آفلاین؛ تماشا در ه…
⭐️از شناخت طرحوارهها تا تغییر عمیق در زندگی و روابط⭐️
🎓 کارگاه جامع طرحوارهدرمانی؛ از مقدماتی تا پیشرفته
🔗 ثبتنام:
https://school.ravanboneh.com/join/68
👩🏫 مدرس: دکتر الناز حاجتی
📚 در این دوره میآموزید
🔴 اصول و مبانی طرحواره درمانی
🔴شکلگیری و انواع طرحوارههای ناسازگار
🔴تکنیکهای شناختی، تجربهای و میانفردی
💻 دوره کاملاً آفلاین
⏰ مدت دوره: ۴۰ ساعت
🏆همراه با مدرک معتبر
🎁 با پرداخت تنها ۱ میلیون و ۸۰۰ هزا…
📌 تغییرات مهم چهارمین آزمون صلاحیت حرفهای روانشناسان و مشاوران ۱۴۰۵
🔸آزمون به ۱۵ آبان ۱۴۰۵ موکول شد.
🔸 مهلت ثبتنام تا ۱۰ مرداد ۱۴۰۵ تمدید شد.
🔸 شرط پایان خدمت برای آقایان حذف شد.
🔸 بند «حداقل مدرک کارشناسی ارشد» حذف شد.
🔸 الزام وارد کردن شماره عضویت سازمان نظام روانشناسی و مشاوره کشور حذف شد.
🔖 سرفصلهای جدید آزمون
🌈 رشته روانشناسی و گرایشهای مرتبط
🟢 آسیبشناسی روانی
🟢 اخلاق حرفهای
🟢 نظریههای مشاوره و روان…
💡 وبینار رایگان | ماورای اصل لذت؛ چرا انسان به سوی رنج بازمیگردد؟
آیا تا به حال از خودتان پرسیدهاید چرا انسان گاهی با وجود آگاهی از پیامدها، دوباره به سمت رنج، تکرار و روابط آسیبزا بازمیگردد؟
✨در این وبینار رایگان، با نگاهی روانکاوانه به مفهوم «اصل لذت»، ساختار ذهن و چرخه تکرار رنج خواهیم پرداخت.
⚠️⚠️ظرفیت محدود است؛ همین امروز ثبتنام کنید
🔗https://school.ravanboneh.com/course/suffering-return?ref=6288
👩🎓 م…
👏5❤3
Signed Rooeen_Ravannn
Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @rooeen_ravan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@rooeen_ravan edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
12 August 2026
Most recent edit
12 August 2026
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
آدمخواران» ژان تولی را در چند ویدیوی کوتاه و بدون اسپویل بررسی کنیم؟
🔥 آره! خیلی کنجکاوم57%
🤨بله، اگر کوتاه و کاربردی باشد28%
❌ فعلاً نه، محتوای دیگری اولویت دارد21%
The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 15 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 44 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
2
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
2
vacant every time we have ever looked
@rooeen_ravan named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@roeeen_ravan named in 5 posts, 8 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
@rsvsnboneh2 named in 3 posts, 8 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
فایل کارگاههای روانشناسی @psykargah · 23,109 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 19 September 2026
کانال فایل های صوتی وفیلم های روانشناسی وبهترین کتابها @psycology_OM · 23,015 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 19 September 2026
کتابخانه روانشناسی @ketabb_khaneh · 39,369 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 31 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Rooeen_Ravan” (@rooeen_ravan), 7,164 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rooeen_ravan.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.