Channel
@royayiiii
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
38,523subscribers
-1,826 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001263919941 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @royayiiii |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 61 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/royayiiii |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 65% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Nov 2026, 08:14 | 38,523 | -291 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 10:50 | 38,814 | -363 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 09:59 | 39,177 | +9,553 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 11:00 | 29,624 | -45 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 10:15 | 29,669 | -88 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 09:30 | 29,757 | -115 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 11:31 | 29,872 | -762 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 09:05 | 30,634 | -5,249 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 09:39 | 35,883 | -7,534 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 11:36 | 43,417 | -458 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 11:39 | 43,875 | -101 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 15:05 | 43,976 | -180 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 13:45 | 44,156 | -745 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 16:48 | 44,901 | -1,058 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 17:16 | 45,959 | -71 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 17:14 | 46,030 | -212 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 12:55 | 46,242 | -73 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 08:28 | 46,315 | -124 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 11:57 | 46,439 | -107 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 09:38 | 46,546 | first reading |
178 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 179 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 178 (5 August 2026 – 5 November 2026) |
| Views total | 293,556 |
| Reactions total | 905 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Nov 2026, 01:24 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
8,617 reactions across 178 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 4,184 | 48.6% | |
| 💯 | 1,443 | 16.7% | |
| 👍 | 788 | 9.14% | |
| 😘 | 447 | 5.19% | |
| 💔 | 443 | 5.14% | |
| 👏 | 424 | 4.92% | |
| 🕊 | 246 | 2.85% | |
| ❤🔥 | 194 | 2.25% | |
| 🙏 | 165 | 1.91% | |
| 😭 | 76 | 0.882% | |
| 😍 | 75 | 0.87% | |
| 🤣 | 66 | 0.766% | |
| 🔥 | 32 | 0.371% | |
| 💘 | 20 | 0.232% | |
| 🤝 | 8 | 0.093% | |
| 🎉 | 3 | 0.035% | |
| 🤩 | 2 | 0.023% | |
| ☃ | 1 | 0.012% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 178 of the 178 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,617 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 178 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 23 posts held from the last 30 days (13.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
مادرم گفت: «من پنج نفر را یکجا از دست دادهام…» این را چنان گفت که انگار از پنج مرگ حرف نمیزند؛ از پنج تکه از وجودش میگوید که از او کندهاند و هنوز جای خالیشان در سینهاش خونریزی میکند. بعد ادامه داد: «حال دلم طوری است که اگر بفهمم کسی بیش از اندازه به یکی از چهار بچهام آزار رسانده، آدمش را دارم، پولش را هم دارم. میدهم دستوپایش را بشکنند؛ شاید هم یک چشمش را کور کنند. اصلاً تمام مالم را میدهم تا طرف را با خا…
❤15👍3💯1
مامان جانم… این نغمه را به یاد ذوق تو نهادم؛ که میدانم دوستش داری. بگذار هر زمان که دلت خواست، گوش جان به آن بسپاری...🫶
❤12🕊3🙏2
مرا مپرس ز اندوه جان خستهی من، که اشک،قصهی ناگفته را بیان داند. نه شرح درد طلب دارم و نه گوش سؤال، دلم نوازش مهر و نگاه مهربان داند. چه حاجت است به گفتن، چو دل شکسته بود؟ که حال خستهدلان را خدا عیان داند. دکتر رکسانا"رویا" @royayiiii📚
❤14🕊7👍4
شوالیهی عزیزم… خوب میدانم که ما، من و تو و تمام آنهایی که هنوز دلشان به روشنی مهر زنده است، از تبار دلسپردگانیم؛ از جنس آدمهایی که بلدند برای دیگران چتر شوند، حتی وقتی خودشان زیر باران بیامان زندگی ایستادهاند. ما از آن آدمهایی هستیم که پناه میدهند، بیآنکه بپرسند طوفان از کجا آمده است؛ که دست میگیرند، بیآنکه به خستگی دستهای خودشان فکر کنند. اما دریغ که درست همانجا که نوبت دلهای خودمان میرسد، گاهی جهان …
❤15💯8👏5
شوالیه عزیزم : من هرگز زشتی را در چهرهی هیچ انسانی جستوجو نکردم؛ زیرا باور دارم زشتی، پیش از آنکه در سیمای آدمی پدیدار شود، در روحش ریشه میدواند. چه بسیار صورتهای دلفریبی که پشت نقاب زیبایی، پستی را پنهان کردهاند؛ و چه بسیار چهرههای سادهای که نجابت روحشان، هزاران زیبایی را شرمسار میکند. زیبایی را طبیعت به انسان میبخشد؛ اما بزرگی را باید با انتخابها، شرافت و غلبه بر نفس خویش به دست آورد. شگفتا از انسانی که …
❤26👏18💯3
بعضیها چه شگفت موجوداتیاند! بر فراز منبر میروند، چنان از پاکی و پرهیزگاری سخن میگویند که گویی خداوند، کلید بهشت را شخصاً به آنان سپرده است. مال دیگران را حرام میخوانند، و برای هر خطای کوچک دیگران، حکم اخلاق صادر میکنند. اما دریغ از آنکه نگاهی هم به پایین منبر، به خانه و کاشانهی خویش بیندازند! آنجا که دخترشان، همان اصولی را زیر پا میگذارد که پدر بر سر مردم میکوبد. و این است مضحکهی بزرگ اخلاق: قانون برای دیگ…
💯31❤18👏11
File, posted without a caption
❤5❤🔥3🕊3
قسمت بیستم به قلم : دکتر.ر. کیانی آن جمعه، عصر چنان دلگیر بود که گویی آسمان از فرط اندوه، دیگر حوصله نداشت خودش را بالای سر زمین نگه دارد. ابرها پایین آمده بودند؛ آنقدر پایین که آدم خیال میکرد اگر دستش را بلند کند، میتواند گوشهای از اندوه آسمان را لمس کند. از آن عصرهایی بود که سکوت، از هر صدایی بلندتر است و آدم، بیآنکه بداند چرا، دلش میخواهد به جایی برود که دیگر کسی از آنجا برنمیگردد. به قبرستان بر مزار پدرم…
❤23🙏6💯1
طبیعی است که آغازها زیبا باشند زیرا منطقی نیست کسی نزدت بیاید و بگوید: سلام، من آدم پستی هستم. ✍🏻داستایفسکی @royayiiii📚
💯49❤15👍9
File, posted without a caption
❤17💯1🕊1
علاوه بر اینکه با هرکسی معاشرت نمیکنم؛ با آدمی که با هرکسی معاشرت میکنه هم معاشرت نمیکنم. @royayiiii📚
👍28❤20🕊3
File, posted without a caption
❤26😍15🕊2
Showing the 12 most recent of 178 posts we hold for @royayiiii. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@royayiiii edited 5 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
We recorded 6 posts on @royayiiii as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
@royayiiii named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 28 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“❀─── رویا نامه ───❀” (@royayiiii), 38,523 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/royayiiii.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.