Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 86% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
60 measurements spanning 93 days, net +175. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 34,895–35,235 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 60
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Nov 2026, 08:01
35,109
-5
6 Nov 2026, 05:57
35,114
+10
5 Nov 2026, 06:50
35,104
-3
4 Nov 2026, 03:28
35,107
-15
3 Nov 2026, 00:08
35,122
+1
2 Nov 2026, 03:28
35,121
-8
1 Nov 2026, 00:26
35,129
-4
30 Oct 2026, 04:39
35,133
-7
29 Oct 2026, 07:47
35,140
-14
28 Oct 2026, 03:37
35,154
-10
27 Oct 2026, 03:26
35,164
-3
26 Oct 2026, 01:29
35,167
-12
24 Oct 2026, 03:36
35,179
-17
23 Oct 2026, 02:56
35,196
+13
22 Oct 2026, 04:27
35,183
+14
21 Oct 2026, 00:58
35,169
+15
19 Oct 2026, 22:59
35,154
-5
18 Oct 2026, 23:48
35,159
+9
18 Oct 2026, 01:19
35,150
+8
16 Oct 2026, 22:27
35,142
first reading
Engagement
65 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 168 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
15.2%
avg views ÷ 35,109 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,350
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.58%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 65 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held
65 (24 July 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total
101,560
Reactions total
589
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Nov 2026, 05:53 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 29s
Average length
13s
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,948 reactions across 63 posts, in 35 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
577
29.6%
custom 5393123749924984737
325
16.7%
🔥
268
13.8%
👍
154
7.91%
✍
96
4.93%
🥴
72
3.70%
❤🔥
68
3.49%
🎉
59
3.03%
😡
48
2.46%
😁
44
2.26%
👏
29
1.49%
😱
25
1.28%
💯
22
1.13%
👀
20
1.03%
⚡
17
0.873%
🤔
17
0.873%
😭
16
0.821%
🤣
15
0.77%
😢
11
0.565%
🤨
11
0.565%
15 further kinds
54
2.77%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 65 of the 65 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,040 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 65 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 19 posts held from the last 30 days (5.26%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Пусть всё будет по-своему 💚
Свои планы, свои привычки, свои маленькие поводы для радости. А ещё — СВОЯ карта, с которой повседневные дела становятся немного приятнее:
⭐️ Бесплатные выпуск и обслуживание
⭐️ До 15% баллами за покупки
⭐️ 5 категорий покупок на выбор каждый месяц
⭐️ Возможность обменивать баллы на рубли или оплачивать ими покупки по курсу 1 балл = 1 рубль:
— фермерские продукты и товары ручной работы …
В чёрном-чёрном городе, на чёрной-чёрной улице, в чёрном-чёрном кошельке лежала чёрная карта… 🎃
И это не просто карта, а страшно полезная кредитная карта СВОЯ:
💳 Льготный период до 115 дней
📆 Каждый месяц — 5 категорий на выбор и до 15% баллами за покупки в них
🔥 Бесплатные выпуск и обслуживание
Оформить карту — клик
👍 РСХБ в MAX | VK
✏️ Онлайн-игры: как уберечь детей от неожиданных трат
На осенних каникулах у детей больше времени на онлайн-игры. Но иногда игровые уловки подталкивают их к покупкам, даже если они не собирались тратить деньги.
Например, кнопка оплаты выглядит как обычный элемент игры, цену легко не заметить, а кнопку отказа от покупки трудно найти. А когда стоимость указана в «монетах» или «кристаллах», не так просто понять, сколь…
🐼 У нашей панды всё складывается как надо
А если вы тоже собираетесь в путешествие, присмотритесь к карте UnionPay: ей удобно оплачивать покупки как в России, так и за границей.
Оформление первой карты в рублях — бесплатно.
❤️ — если тоже любите открывать новые места
👍 РСХБ в MAX | VK
🥇 Всероссийская акция «Монетная неделя»
До 7 ноября вы можете прийти в наши отделения и обменять накопившуюся мелочь на купюры или сразу зачислить её на счёт — без комиссии 👍
Как это сделать?
➡️ Соберите монеты, выпущенные с 1997 года, и рассортируйте их по номиналу.
➡️ Возьмите с собой паспорт.
➡️ Выберите отделение банка.
Все подробности акции, адреса и часы работы отделений можно посмотреть здесь
👍 РСХБ в MAX…
Кешбэк сам себя не выберет
📆 Самое время заглянуть в мобильное приложение и выбрать тему и категории кешбэка на ноябрь.
Получайте до 15% баллами за покупки в выбранных категориях. Накопленные баллы можно обменивать на рубли или компенсировать ими покупки у партнёров по курсу 1 балл = 1 рубль:
🟡 фермерские продукты и товары ручной работы в Своё Родное
🟡 билеты, туры выходного дня и бронирование отелей в Своё За гор…
V Российский винодельческий форум: о вине и не только 🍇
📍 С 21 по 23 октября в Геленджике состоялся винодельческий форум — мы традиционно выступили его соорганизатором. Впервые форум прошёл в эногастрономическом городском пространстве — Винном городе «Белый мыс».
Производство российского вина за пять лет выросло на 33%. За последние годы мы направили 52 млрд руб. на развитие виноградарства и виноделия, в том числе …
Мошенники тоже готовятся к зиме ⚡️
С началом отопительного сезона в подъездах могут появляться объявления о проверке систем отопления. Злоумышленники размещают такие листовки с QR-кодами, чтобы заманить жильцов на поддельные сайты или в фальшивые чаты.
Как распознать уловку и защитить себя?
➡️ Уточняйте информацию — узнайте в управляющей компании, действительно ли запланированы работы и визиты специалистов.
➡️ Об…
Вклад, накопительный счёт или инвестиции — что выбрать? 🥇
Допустим, у вас есть свободные 100 000 рублей. Что с ними делать: открыть вклад, положить на накопительный счёт или инвестировать?
Разбираемся ⬇️
🟩Если деньги могут понадобиться в любой момент — накопительный счёт
Например, вы откладываете на отпуск, ремонт или формируете финансовую подушку.
На накопительном счёте Мой счёт можно хранить деньги, пополнять с…
❤18✍8⚡6custom 53931237499249847374🔥2😭2🤔1
Showing the 12 most recent of 65 posts we hold for @rshb_tg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Признавайтесь, на что у вас обычно уходит больше всего денег в августе?
Школьные сборы 📚27%
Отпуск 🌴43%
Дача 🏡12%
Одежда и обувь 👟26%
Арбузы 🍉21%
The shares total 129%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Какие риски существуют при подключении к общественной Wi‑Fi сети?
Никаких рисков нет7%
Блокировка сим-карты1%
Перехват трафика и кража данных92%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 65 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 6 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 23 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Referenced elsewhere
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
Россельхозбанк(ru.wikipedia.org) “…asp?id=450039042 Россельхозбанк на сайте Центробанка России]
* [https://t.me/rshb_tg Официальный Telegram канал банка]
* [https://vk.ru/rshbru Официальное…” read 1 November 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“РСХБ” (@rshb_tg), 35,109 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rshb_tg.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.