Channel

🍃🌹 علي حبه جنه 🌹🍃

@rsrsrs88

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

333subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID	-1001148035502
Type	Channel
Username	@rsrsrs88
Created	Between 1 June 2016 and 31 January 2020 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded	6 August 2026
Last confirmed live	12 September 2026
Measurements held	5
Confirmed unchanged	1 time, most recently 12 September 2026
On Telegram	t.me/rsrsrs88

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted first	Then	Overlap	Gap
@rsrsrs88/77617 · this entry2 Mar 2023, 05:11 UTC	@amar296/580115 Mar 2023, 01:45 UTC	1.00	3 days
@amar296/580126 Mar 2023, 04:03 UTC	@rsrsrs88/77622 · this entry6 Mar 2023, 04:03 UTC	1.00	under a minute
@amar296/580149 Mar 2023, 08:40 UTC	@rsrsrs88/77624 · this entry9 Mar 2023, 08:40 UTC	1.00	under a minute
@amar296/5801710 Mar 2023, 11:26 UTC	@rsrsrs88/77625 · this entry10 Mar 2023, 11:26 UTC	1.00	under a minute
@amar296/5802213 Mar 2023, 21:07 UTC	@rsrsrs88/77628 · this entry13 Mar 2023, 21:07 UTC	1.00	under a minute
@amar296/5802415 Mar 2023, 16:22 UTC	@rsrsrs88/77630 · this entry15 Mar 2023, 16:22 UTC	1.00	under a minute

Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
Channel	Matching posts	Text overlap	Typical gap	Published first
@amar296	7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed)	1.00	under a minute	this entry (6–1)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 1 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 20 comparable posts for this entry, running 1 March 2023 to 29 April 2023. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @rsrsrs88 — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

💔💔 أّلَزِّهِرأّء أمَلَيِّ 💔💔
@amar296 · Channel214 subscribers

Growth

5 measurements spanning 38 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 332–338 and does not start at zero.

Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)	Subscribers	Change
12 Sept 2026, 16:41	333	-1
4 Sept 2026, 06:36	334	-2
28 Aug 2026, 19:27	336	-1
6 Aug 2026, 21:45	337	no change
6 Aug 2026, 04:06	337	first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 1 March 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 April 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

﮼يا،صاحب،روحي 📿💙
@AL_mnafe · 18819 posts ياصاحب الزمان 🤎
@Ali648ali · 12419 posts الكفــــيل
@ALKafell · 25819 posts ستوريات وثقافة مهدوية
@AlMansour313 · 12419 posts المصمم الحسيني
@astory17 · 3619 posts 🏴ختمات مجربه لقضاء الحوائج🏴 🙏🙏
@asuqw · 3,80819 posts زَهـرة الـمهديـ³¹³✨⁦🍁
@ayo_313 · 11319 posts حب المنتضر يجمعنا💖✨💕🌷
@chyuig · 13119 posts قناة ابو محمد الاسدي
@hsaennn · 9519 posts بَقِيَّتُ الله خَيرٌ لَكُم
@ma_hddi_313 · 12019 posts الخادم المرحوم ملا مهدي الكليباوي
@mumuggeeww · 35019 posts لـ اٌيڤيـن
@nonojt · 33219 posts ياابا_الفضل_العباس، ♥✨
@rjcivh · 54519 posts سجاد الربيع
@sajjadiraniraq · 29719 posts عشاق الحاج قاسم سليماني والحاج ابو مهدي المهندس
@solemanemohands · 18019 posts قبّـس من نور ٱﻟ̣̣مهدي •
@The_promised · 31519 posts تسبيحات فاطمة الزهراء والائمة ؏"
@tsbehat · 24619 posts •﴿ادعية للاموات ﴾•
@wuio313 · 27519 posts يا مَهدي روحي🤍
@yamahdyruhy · 7019 posts قناة طلاب الخارجي🖤
@sjdjfkkek · 16118 posts جَــون 🇮🇷
@Abba_Fadl · 3458 posts قُنِأّةّ أّحًبًأّبً أّمً أّلَبًنِيِّنِ وٌأّلَعٌتٌـرةّ أّلَمًحًمًدٍيِّةّ «؏»
@NoorAlHussein313 · 3,9918 posts لـ بنـين
@baelh · 305 posts ألاستاذة الشاعرة تقى الگربلائية
@jvfhihjjh · 735 posts

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Handles this channel named that no longer answer

Dead references: 4; handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone: 0; we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive: 4; vacant every time we have ever looked

@rsrsrs88 named 4 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.

Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.

Never seen alive

References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.

@fat_3l3
named in 19 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026

@zzlsneuvnegc
named in 19 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026

@gh_uyum1
named in 18 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026

@ryf47hkn79
named in 18 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🍃🌹 علي حبه جنه 🌹🍃” (@rsrsrs88), 333 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rsrsrs88.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.