Channel
@ruslan_rentaved
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
12,570subscribers
+154 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001770411622 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ruslan_rentaved |
| Created | 27 February 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 32 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ruslan_rentaved |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 66% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 01:20 | 12,570 | +8 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 19:37 | 12,562 | +8 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 19:39 | 12,554 | +31 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 08:41 | 12,523 | +32 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 09:18 | 12,491 | +32 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 12:59 | 12,459 | -13 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 07:03 | 12,472 | +2 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 02:52 | 12,470 | +10 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 05:45 | 12,460 | +3 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 04:37 | 12,457 | +2 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 03:05 | 12,455 | +2 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 04:56 | 12,453 | -3 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 07:03 | 12,456 | +3 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 06:35 | 12,453 | -3 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 08:11 | 12,456 | +4 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 08:42 | 12,452 | +4 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 13:12 | 12,448 | -6 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 02:05 | 12,454 | +4 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 05:03 | 12,450 | +8 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 03:03 | 12,442 | first reading |
58 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 55 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 58 (22 July 2026 – 2 September 2026) |
| Views total | 33,768 |
| Reactions total | 527 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 2 Sept 2026, 21:42 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
2,708 reactions across 45 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 2,708 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 51 of the 58 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,005 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 58 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2VtzqxL3U6N | 1 | 31 July 2026 | 31 July 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 58 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Налоговая идёт по следу Жительница Уфы рассказала в рилсе: у нас четыре квартиры, ипотека — 90 тысяч в месяц. Без пафоса. Просто факт. Ролик залетел. Через две недели — требование из налоговой: выписки по счетам за 2025 год. Собрала. Отправила. Через месяц — новое. Уже за три года. Срок — пять дней. На последнем месяце беременности она бегала по банкам, собирала выписки даже по закрытым счетам 2018 года. Сотрудник…
👍58
К нам на эфир идёт сам амбассадор даркосторов. Воспользуйтесь возможностью и регистрируйтесь на еженедельный эфир с Константином Самариным 🎧Гость эфира: Евгений Барболин. Один из ключевых игроков на рынке дарксторов в России. Тема: «Рынок дарксторов сегодня и его перспективы. ГАБ-проекты с федеральными арендаторами» Дата: 2 сентября в 9:00 Кол-во открытых мест на эфир: 30 👉 Регистрация на эфир: ССЫЛКА
👍15
Без крыльев Кто из девелоперов упадёт первым, а кто взлетит? Самые непростые точки сейчас — Крым и Сочи. Перегрелись быстрее всех. Дальше — цифры по всем. Рынок девелопмента окончательно расслоился. Пока одни тонут в убытках, другие проходят кризис в плюсе. Постараюсь быть объективным. По данным ЕРЗ, 33% застройщиков работают в убыток, а прибыль по жилым проектам фиксируют лишь 40%. Каждый десятый девелопер рискуе…
👍63
Зависание Поделюсь личным. Несколько месяцев назад я сидел с сыном. Он хотел рассказать мне про свою идею. Проект, который придумал. Как будет делать, что для этого нужно, какие у него планы. Он горел. Я смотрел на него и кивал. Где-то на третьей минуте я уже не слышал ни слова. Я смотрел в его глаза, но видел экран своего мобильного. Телефон лежал рядом, и в голове уже крутилось: "А вдруг там что-то срочное? А вдр…
👍113
Размагнитился Акции Магнита обвалились до минимума, которого не было 17 лет — ниже 1450 рублей за бумагу. С исторических максимумов около 8500 рублей падение превысило 80%. Это не просто коррекция — это рыночный приговор модели управления, которую банкиры, забравшие бизнес у Галицкого, так и не смогли настроить. Выручка Магнита в 2025 году выросла на 15,3% — до 3,5 трлн рублей. Но компания получила чистый убыток 1…
👍91
Когда грядут перемены В Швейцарских Альпах строят подземные хранилища для ценностей богатейших людей мира на случай катастроф. Их возводит компания Brünig Mega Safe AG на глубине более 100 метров в массиве Брюниг. Аренда одного хранилища на 99 лет обойдется до €1 млн. Первые контракты уже заключены. Уровень безопасности обещают сопоставимый с хранилищами Швейцарского национального банка. В бункерах можно будет хр…
👍63
90% ведущих компаний внедрили это в бизнес Статистика показывает, около 55% всех организаций в мире используют ИИ для решения рабочих задач, а среди ведущих мировых корпораций этот показатель превышает 90%. AI уже становится не экспериментом технологичных компаний, а обычным рабочим инструментом. Разница между теми, кто уже умеет работать с AI, и теми, кто пока только наблюдает, будет расти. Поэтому сейчас важно н…
👍41
Video message, posted without a caption
👍27
А вы из «единиц» или из большинства?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👍1
Новые приоритеты Мы перестаём быть «целевой аудиторией». И это касается не только кроссовок. Forbes и Data Insight бьют тревогу: к началу 2030-х годов ИИ-агенты будут проводить до 11% всех продаж в сети. А доля нейросетей в выручке брендов дойдёт до 30%. Но привычный маркетинг ломается уже сейчас. Пока мы готовы отдать ИИ только поиск товара (чтобы сэкономить время), но не кнопку «Оплатить» — здесь включается микро…
👍55
Канарейка Шахтёры брали птицу с собой под землю: пока поёт — дышим, замолчала — бросай инструмент и наверх. Канарейка чувствует газ раньше человека. В британских шахтах их держали до 1986 года. Так вот, капиталы больших фондов — это ровно такая канарейка. Они чувствуют, где кончился кислород, раньше нас с вами. Давайте посмотрим, где канарейки замолчали. За первое полугодие частные инвесторы вложили в коммерческу…
👍72
Сегодня день рождения друга! Знаешь, я часто вспоминаю одну мысль: настоящий друг — это будто одна душа на двоих. И когда я смотрю на нас, мне кажется, что мы уже где-то встречались — может, в прошлых жизнях, а может, просто судьба так хитро сплела наши дороги. И я верю, что случайностей не бывает. Ещё говорят, что, глядя на друга, можно разглядеть себя настоящего. И это правда. Дружба — это ведь работа, труд, ежед…
👍83
Showing the 12 most recent of 58 posts we hold for @ruslan_rentaved. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@ruslan_rentaved edited 5 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
The 6 most recent of 7 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
А вы из «единиц» или из большинства?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Ждёте ли вы заморозки вкладов в ближайшие пару лет?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Как вам мои длинные посты?
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Как долго, по вашему мнению, продлится текущий период экономической турбулентности в стране (высокие ставки, инфляция, волатильный рубль)?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Какой регион сейчас самый рискованный для покупки номеров в отеле или апартаментов?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Купили бы сейчас метры в Сочи?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 58 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 21 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Руслан Рентавед 🖌” (@ruslan_rentaved), 12,570 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ruslan_rentaved.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.