Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Русский язык 🎩

Channel

Русский язык 🎩

@russkiIyazyyk

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

10,286subscribers

-195 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001284420573
TypeChannel
Username@russkiIyazyyk
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 September 2026
Measurements held31
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/russkiIyazyyk

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 78% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@russkiIyazyyk/10081 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 06:01 UTC@learnrus1/48707 Aug 2026, 06:02 UTC0.98under a minute
@russkiIyazyyk/10072 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 09:01 UTC@learnrus1/48616 Aug 2026, 09:01 UTC0.97under a minute
@russkiIyazyyk/10084 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 09:02 UTC@learnrus1/48737 Aug 2026, 09:02 UTC0.97under a minute
@russkiIyazyyk/10075 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 14:01 UTC@learnrus1/48646 Aug 2026, 14:01 UTC0.96under a minute
@russkiIyazyyk/10071 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 06:01 UTC@learnrus1/48606 Aug 2026, 06:01 UTC0.96under a minute
@russkiIyazyyk/10076 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 16:01 UTC@learnrus1/48656 Aug 2026, 16:01 UTC0.96under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@learnrus17 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.96under a minutethis entry (7–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 23 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @russkiIyazyyk — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

10,28610,48110,383.57 August 2026 — 10,481 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,481 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,475 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,472 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,465 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,463 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,461 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,458 subscribers16 August 2026 — 10,455 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,454 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,452 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,451 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,447 subscribers21 August 2026 — 10,444 subscribers22 August 2026 — 10,437 subscribers24 August 2026 — 10,429 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,426 subscribers26 August 2026 — 10,421 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,419 subscribers29 August 2026 — 10,416 subscribers30 August 2026 — 10,415 subscribers31 August 2026 — 10,412 subscribers1 September 2026 — 10,413 subscribers3 September 2026 — 10,409 subscribers5 September 2026 — 10,396 subscribers9 September 2026 — 10,384 subscribers11 September 2026 — 10,381 subscribers13 September 2026 — 10,377 subscribers15 September 2026 — 10,369 subscribers17 September 2026 — 10,360 subscribers25 September 2026 — 10,286 subscribers7 August 202625 September 2026
31 measurements spanning 49 days, net -195. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,257–10,510 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 31
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Sept 2026, 11:1810,286-74
17 Sept 2026, 09:5510,360-9
15 Sept 2026, 07:5610,369-8
13 Sept 2026, 13:3710,377-4
11 Sept 2026, 17:3610,381-3
9 Sept 2026, 00:4010,384-12
5 Sept 2026, 14:2010,396-13
3 Sept 2026, 12:1510,409-4
1 Sept 2026, 02:4810,413+1
31 Aug 2026, 01:3410,412-3
30 Aug 2026, 03:4510,415-1
29 Aug 2026, 03:2710,416-3
27 Aug 2026, 06:5610,419-2
26 Aug 2026, 07:0210,421-5
25 Aug 2026, 05:5310,426-3
24 Aug 2026, 08:2210,429-8
22 Aug 2026, 15:3210,437-7
21 Aug 2026, 07:2710,444-3
20 Aug 2026, 08:3310,447-4
19 Aug 2026, 06:5910,451first reading

Engagement

225 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 38 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.15%
avg views ÷ 10,286 subscribers
Avg views / post
118
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.948%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 225 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026
Posts held225 (5 August 2026 – 29 August 2026)
Views total1,303
Reactions total4
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 14:56 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
5m 13s
Average length
20s

Measured directly from 16 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

40 reactions across 35 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2255.0%
❤1640.0%
🐳12.50%
🔥12.50%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 37 of the 225 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 40 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 225 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Aug 2026, 14:01 UTC39 viewsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Слово «мондегрин» обозначает переосмысление неверно разобранных со слуха слов. Или проще – ослышка. - В случае, если исходный текст представляет собой известную песню или стихотворение, частая ослышка может приобретать популярность: «шизгара», «водки найду» вместо «What Can I Do?», «скрипка-лиса» и «скрип колеса». - Случались ли ослышки? Вы слышали текст в песне один, а на самом деле он был другим? https://t.me…

29 Aug 2026, 12:01 UTC70 viewsread 29 August 2026
Photo

#юмор https://t.me/russkiIyazyyk ⁣⁣Новости из капитолия - Москоутрендс. Подписывайся!

29 Aug 2026, 09:01 UTC101 viewsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Так называют синдром задержки фазы сна. Дисания - это не просто непреодолимое ощущение сонливости, это хроническая неспособность встать с постели. • Страдающие таким «заболеванием» могут оставаться в постели целыми днями и часто испытывают беспокойство при мысли о том, что им надо вставать. • Они также могут почувствовать «страстное желание» опять лечь в постель, стоит им только попробовать встать с нее. https://…

29 Aug 2026, 06:02 UTC115 viewsread 29 August 2026

Можно ли так сказать: померяй этот наряд? 🤷‍♀️ С использованием глагола «мерить» проблемы бывают даже у грамотных людей. Правильно использовать глагол «померь», а формы «померяй» или «померий» — неправильные. Также допустимо использовать глагол «примерь». #интересное https://t.me/russkiIyazyyk ⁣⁣Новости из капитолия - Москоутрендс. Подписывайся!

28 Aug 2026, 20:01 UTC146 viewsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Пришло время для нового челленджа: надо выговорить 1 раза без единой запинки. https://t.me/russkiIyazyyk ⁣⁣Новости из капитолия - Москоутрендс. Подписывайся!

28 Aug 2026, 18:01 UTC138 views1 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Обидно, конечно, перчатку посеять. Но много обидней, наверное, Одну потеряв, бросить к чёрту другую - И тут же наткнуться на первую. — Пит Хейн ✍️ https://t.me/russkiIyazyyk

👍1

28 Aug 2026, 16:01 UTC138 views1 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Челендж из скороговорок, которые ломают мозг: надо выговорить цепочку 5 раз без единой запинки Повар Пётр и повар Павел, Пётр пёк, а Павел парил, Парил Павел, Пётр пёк, Повар Пётр и повар Павел. Дали Алику рогалик, Алик дал рогалик Алле, Алла Алика ругала и рогалик ела Алла. https://t.me/russkiIyazyyk ⁣⁣🐶 ЛУЧШИЙ БЕСПЛАТНЫЙ ВПН 🩸

👍1

28 Aug 2026, 14:01 UTC140 viewsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Если вам когда-нибудь приходилось не только произносить этот глагол, но и писать его, вы наверняка вставали перед дилеммой: А я — «лазаю» или «лажу»? - Эти различающиеся формы образуются от двух разных глаголов: «лазить» и «лазать». Оба есть в словарях, и оба можно использовать в речи. Личные формы глаголов будут такие: «лазить» — «лажу», «лазит», «лазишь», «лазите», «лазят»; «лазать» — «лазаю», «лазает», «лазаешь»,…

28 Aug 2026, 13:05 UTC138 viewsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Да, мы реально отдаем старые модели iPhone — не за деньги, не за репост, а просто за подписку на наш магазин. Почему? Потому что хотим набрать первых 100 подписчиков и дать им максимум доверия. Ты ничего не теряешь, но можешь получить айфон. Жми на кнопку, подпишись и попади в список.

28 Aug 2026, 12:01 UTC146 views2 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Слово недели: мафия Снова о том, как изначально положительное значение становится с ног на голову. С IX по XI век Сицилия была арабским эмиратом. В сицилийский диалект проникли арабские слова māhiyā («смелость», «чувство собственного достоинства») и ma'āfī («защищенный», «освобожденный от гнета»). В Сицилии начала XIX века слово mafioso вообще не означало преступника. Так говорили про красивого, щеголеватого, горд…

👍2

28 Aug 2026, 09:01 UTC167 viewsread 29 August 2026

В экстренной ситуации наш мозг либо отупевает и сидит как та обезьянка с тарелками, либо начинает работать с бешеной скоростью. А. Черчень «Моя свободная нечисть» https://t.me/russkiIyazyyk

Showing the 12 most recent of 225 posts we hold for @russkiIyazyyk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@russkiIyazyyk edited 23 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
29 August 2026

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Антиэйдж Хаб | как сохранить молодость
@goyazikoved1 · 25,460
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 13 September 2026
Всезнайка
@vseznayu · 23,640
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 18 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Русский язык 🎩” (@russkiIyazyyk), 10,286 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/russkiIyazyyk.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.