Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for RUSTGRADE

Channel

RUSTGRADE

@rustgrade

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

12,885subscribers

+1,514 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003987646659
TypeChannel
Username@rustgrade
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 1 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live31 August 2026
Measurements held24
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 31 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/rustgrade

Growth

11,37127,47019,420.57 August 2026 — 11,371 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,465 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,024 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,946 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,105 subscribers11 August 2026 — 12,100 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,300 subscribers14 August 2026 — 27,470 subscribers15 August 2026 — 19,199 subscribers16 August 2026 — 12,622 subscribers17 August 2026 — 12,602 subscribers18 August 2026 — 12,576 subscribers19 August 2026 — 12,546 subscribers20 August 2026 — 12,683 subscribers21 August 2026 — 12,606 subscribers23 August 2026 — 12,772 subscribers24 August 2026 — 13,799 subscribers25 August 2026 — 13,968 subscribers26 August 2026 — 12,777 subscribers27 August 2026 — 13,970 subscribers28 August 2026 — 12,978 subscribers29 August 2026 — 12,819 subscribers30 August 2026 — 12,842 subscribers31 August 2026 — 12,885 subscribers12,8857 August 202631 August 2026
24 measurements spanning 24 days, net +1,514. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,956–29,885 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
31 Aug 2026, 17:1512,885+43
30 Aug 2026, 20:2612,842+23
29 Aug 2026, 18:0412,819-159
28 Aug 2026, 18:5812,978-992
27 Aug 2026, 18:4713,970+1,193
26 Aug 2026, 19:4812,777-1,191
25 Aug 2026, 21:1713,968+169
24 Aug 2026, 23:5313,799+1,027
23 Aug 2026, 09:4412,772+166
21 Aug 2026, 20:1812,606-77
20 Aug 2026, 19:2412,683+137
19 Aug 2026, 17:5512,546-30
18 Aug 2026, 18:3412,576-26
17 Aug 2026, 20:1812,602-20
16 Aug 2026, 21:1512,622-6,577
15 Aug 2026, 09:3619,199-8,271
14 Aug 2026, 02:0627,470+15,170
12 Aug 2026, 22:4212,300+200
11 Aug 2026, 19:2212,100-5
10 Aug 2026, 22:5312,105first reading

Engagement

90 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 48 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
36.3%
avg views ÷ 12,885 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,680
89 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.654%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
89
of 90 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 88 of 89 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 August 2026
Posts held90 (1 August 202631 August 2026)
Views total416,690
Reactions total2,717
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken31 Aug 2026, 08:52 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 16s
Average length
15s

Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,739 reactions across 88 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,79565.5%
🔥53219.4%
🤯1375.00%
👍1144.16%
🤔983.58%
😱341.24%
😁291.06%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 89 of the 90 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,739 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 90 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 31 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Aug 2026, 06:39 UTC≈1,010 viewsread 31 August 2026
Photo

🧐 ЗАВТРА УЧЁБА И МЫ С ЭТИМ НИЧЕГО НЕ ПОДЕЛАЕМ… Закинем рандомному пользователю 1 SCRAP за его летнюю историю в комментариях — 🟧 RUSTGRADE

30 Aug 2026, 19:03 UTC≈2,010 views4 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Photo

👍 АПГРЕЙД, 30%, УСПЕШНЫЙ, БОНУС, ДА Делай УСПЕШНЫЙ апгрейд с шансом 30% после этого поста и скидывай его в комментарии вместе со своим ID. Завтра один счастливчик получит 5 SCRAP 🟧 RUSTGRADE | 🟧 ГОНКА ЗА СКИНАМИ

4

30 Aug 2026, 14:55 UTC≈2,270 views164 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Photo

👍 Давайте вспомним первый класс и порешаем с вами ребусы 🤔 — Че-то лень вообще лутать промик 🔥 — СПАСИБО ЗА 1 SCRAP

🔥127🤔343

30 Aug 2026, 11:29 UTC≈2,510 views11 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Photo

❤️ ТВОЙ ID ТАК ВЗБУДОРАЖИВАЕТ, О, ЕЩЁ И АВАТАРКУ ВИДНО Закинем 1 SCRAP на баланс за самый красивый ID в комментариях — 🟧 RUSTGRADE

7🤔2🤯2

29 Aug 2026, 18:38 UTC≈2,920 views15 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Photo

😌 ВОТ ПРЯМ НЕХВАТАЕТ НОЧНОГО БОНУСА Делай любой УСПЕШНЫЙ апгрейд после этого поста и скидывай его в комментарии вместе со своим ID. Уже завтра счастливчик получит аналогичный дроп себе на аккаунт Победитель — 58309 🟧 RUSTGRADE | 🟧 РОЗЫГРЫШ 25 СКИНОВ

12👍3

29 Aug 2026, 09:23 UTC≈3,010 views7 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Video

😎 Все возможно, если постараться) — смотрим ваши отзывы «я думал невозможно поднять с 27 скрапа до 270, растгрейд сегодня считает иначе» 🟧 ПРОФИЛЬ | 🟧 БОНУС ЗА ОТЗЫВ

5👍2

28 Aug 2026, 17:17 UTC≈3,240 views79 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Photo

🟧 РОЗЫГРЫШ 25 СКИНОВ ДЛЯ ВАС ЛЮБИМЫХ Призы: ⭐️ 1-25 место —Tempered AK47 Чтобы поучаствовать, нужно: • Быть подписанным на НАС и на НАШ ЧАТ • Быть зарегистрированным на 🟧 RUSTGRADE • Нажать кнопку «УЧАСТВУЮ» Итоги будут подведены 11 СЕНТЯБРЯ

72🔥4👍2😁1

28 Aug 2026, 12:41 UTC≈3,110 views152 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Photo

🤔 А вы заметили главную пасхалку в новом трейлере GTA VI? 🤔 — Кто это? 🔥 — Только из-за этого куплю игру

🔥97🤔399🤯6👍1

28 Aug 2026, 09:06 UTC≈3,230 views510 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Photo

📞 ОТ ВАШИХ РЕАКЦИЙ ЗАВИСИТ, СКОЛЬКО МЫ РАЗДАДИМ Победитель — 123674 (8.72 SCRAP) Закинем рандомному пользователю в 18:00 бонус за его комментарий — 🟧 RUSTGRADE

496🤯9👍5

27 Aug 2026, 19:07 UTC≈3,340 views5 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Photo

🟧 ПОЛУЧИ КЕШБЭК ЗА СВОЙ ПРОИГРЫШ Скидывай в комментарии свой неудачный апгрейд вместе со своим ID. Уже завтра кто-то из вас получит свой скин назад Победитель — 96255 🟧 RUSTGRADE

3🤯2

27 Aug 2026, 15:19 UTC≈3,400 views3 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Photo

🟧 ГОНКА ЗА СКИНАМИ ЗАВЕРШИЛАСЬ 🟧 А вот и наши победители: 🥇 — Мракобес 🥈 — levarov 🥉 — ALLEX666 🏅 — kylt yaponoc 🏅 — ПотужноЛит 🏅 — Zencha 🏅 — IMA 🏅 — Junk 🏅 — [EXO] Sumotoxa 🏅 — Пуська 🟧 ТЕМ ВРЕМЕНЕМ СТАРТОВАЛА НОВАЯ ГОНКА ЗА СКИНАМИ

2🤯1

27 Aug 2026, 11:30 UTC≈3,310 views5 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Video

🟧 Приятненько такой дропчик ловить с самого утреца — смотрим ваши отзывы «с 20 скрапа поднял,вывел моментально» 🟧 ПРОФИЛЬ | 🟧 БОНУС ЗА ОТЗЫВ

5

Showing the 12 most recent of 90 posts we hold for @rustgrade. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@rustgrade edited 27 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
30 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 21,165 of 1,629,518 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 36 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“RUSTGRADE” (@rustgrade), 12,885 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rustgrade.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.