Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Shked

Channel

Shked

@skhedrust

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

15,563subscribers

+172 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002007001802
TypeChannel
Username@skhedrust
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live31 August 2026
Measurements held22
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 31 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/skhedrust

Growth

15,37315,58615,479.57 August 2026 — 15,391 subscribers8 August 2026 — 15,388 subscribers9 August 2026 — 15,394 subscribers10 August 2026 — 15,385 subscribers12 August 2026 — 15,373 subscribers13 August 2026 — 15,384 subscribers15 August 2026 — 15,414 subscribers16 August 2026 — 15,451 subscribers17 August 2026 — 15,506 subscribers18 August 2026 — 15,546 subscribers19 August 2026 — 15,568 subscribers20 August 2026 — 15,571 subscribers22 August 2026 — 15,564 subscribers23 August 2026 — 15,560 subscribers25 August 2026 — 15,565 subscribers26 August 2026 — 15,561 subscribers26 August 2026 — 15,576 subscribers27 August 2026 — 15,586 subscribers28 August 2026 — 15,579 subscribers29 August 2026 — 15,572 subscribers30 August 2026 — 15,571 subscribers31 August 2026 — 15,563 subscribers15,5637 August 202631 August 2026
22 measurements spanning 24 days, net +172. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,341–15,618 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 22
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
31 Aug 2026, 19:1515,563-8
30 Aug 2026, 20:3515,571-1
29 Aug 2026, 21:4615,572-7
28 Aug 2026, 20:1315,579-7
27 Aug 2026, 23:1715,586+10
26 Aug 2026, 23:2315,576+15
26 Aug 2026, 00:0415,561-4
25 Aug 2026, 01:5215,565+5
23 Aug 2026, 13:0415,560-4
22 Aug 2026, 01:3815,564-7
20 Aug 2026, 22:3415,571+3
19 Aug 2026, 19:2115,568+22
18 Aug 2026, 20:3815,546+40
17 Aug 2026, 19:1415,506+55
16 Aug 2026, 16:5215,451+37
15 Aug 2026, 01:4915,414+30
13 Aug 2026, 17:3615,384+11
12 Aug 2026, 14:5415,373-12
10 Aug 2026, 17:1115,385-9
9 Aug 2026, 16:3515,394first reading

Engagement

39 posts held, back to 16 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 50 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
44.7%
avg views ÷ 15,563 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,950
24 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.13%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
24
of 39 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 August 2026
Posts held39 (16 July 202631 August 2026)
Views total166,872
Reactions total1,889
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken31 Aug 2026, 16:55 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
11m 09s
Average length
1m 52s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

3,312 reactions across 39 posts, in 39 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,94258.6%
👍59818.1%
🔥1654.98%
🤡1263.80%
🤣962.90%
👎952.87%
❤‍🔥672.02%
🫡411.24%
💘351.06%
🎄180.543%
😨170.513%
👌120.362%
🦄90.272%
😭80.242%
🤨70.211%
🤯70.211%
🍓60.181%
🏆60.181%
50.151%
👏50.151%
19 further kinds471.42%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 39 of the 39 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,312 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 39 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 31 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
110
across the posts below
Posts paid on
19
of 39 we hold a reading for · 49%
Most on one post
45
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @skhedrust. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 39 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 July 2026 to 31 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

31 Aug 2026, 16:34 UTC652 views36 reactionsread 31 August 2026

Что ж, вот вот на днях будем дропать видосик с мировой войной! Вы готовы к этому? Планируем дропнуть 2-3 числа! Готовы к шкиле?

28🔥4👍2🤡2

28 Aug 2026, 11:00 UTC≈3,820 views122 reactionsread 31 August 2026

Ребят, по стриму отмена. Я очень жестко отравился. Думал смогу отойти, но к сожалению до сих пор плохо 😞

63🫡34😨17🙏3😱2❤‍🔥1👏1💘1

27 Aug 2026, 17:37 UTC≈4,640 views59 reactions8 Starsread 31 August 2026

Кстати! Завтра будем стримить! И я буду собирать клан подписчиков! В 15:00 по мск

48👍8🫡2🍓1

26 Aug 2026, 10:28 UTC≈5,360 views81 reactions2 Starsread 31 August 2026

Записали еще один супер мощнейший видик. В ближайшем времени ваш ждет 2 супер пушки! Глобал варфеер, который по планам выйдет не позднее 5 сентября И след. видик, который выйдет в начале октября

68❤‍🔥11👍1🔥1

23 Aug 2026, 12:47 UTC≈8,260 views45 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Poll

Что делаем?

  1. Текстом и оригинальный голос.79%
  2. ИИ озвучка24%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

👍288❤‍🔥4🌚2🌭1🤡1🦄1

23 Aug 2026, 12:45 UTC≈7,240 views117 reactions6 Starsread 31 August 2026
Video

Или же текстом?

95👍20😁2

23 Aug 2026, 12:43 UTC≈6,640 views81 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Video

Ребят, всем привет! Нужен фидбек от вас! Как вам озвучка? Или лучше текстом?

👎5225🔥4

21 Aug 2026, 15:17 UTC≈6,460 views106 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Forwarded from @server_firePhoto

🎁◻️◻️◻️◻️◻️◻️◻️◻️🎁 — Столько призов, что не верится! Скорее участвуй! 🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 НОВЫЙ БОЛЬШОЙ — Розыгрыш в честь открытия сервера! 🥇1 место: 5.000 ₽ на карту РФ + 2.000 ₽ на баланс магазина 🥈2 место: 3.000 ₽ на карту РФ + 1.500 ₽ на баланс магазина 🥉3 место: 2.000 ₽ на карту РФ + 1.000 ₽ на баланс магазина 🏅4 место: 1.000 ₽ на карту РФ + 500 ₽ на баланс магазина 👕5-10 место: скин до 100 ₽ + 250 ₽ на баланс магази

77🤡8👌4👍4👎4🔥3🖕32

20 Aug 2026, 18:14 UTC≈6,100 views20 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Video

ЗАВАРУШКА на 140 000 РУБЛЕЙ 😨 ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ На 💫 MAGIC RUST уже завтра в 14:00 МСК стартует третий этап БУНКЕРА! Позади два этапа и более 280 000 выигранных рублей. А ведь для этого нужно просто играть в Rust 😉 Если до сих пор не знаешь что за ивент, тыкай на кнопку ниже и лутай фулловый гайд с подарком для старта 👇 Залетай, соревнуйся и зарабатывай бабосы с Бункера на новых Vanilla+ серверах! 💪 💫 MR #1

16👎2❤‍🔥1🔥1

17 Aug 2026, 15:15 UTC≈8,160 views83 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Photo

Рубрика комментарии к видосам. Как всегда всем не угодить. Как же соблюсти ту самую грань, где мы иногда и обсираемся и побеждаем? Сносим всех без шансов - плохо Играем маленькой пачкой вайп и возникают проблемы - тоже плохо. Напишите ваш идеал, что бы вы хотели видеть...

59🤣16👍5🔥3

16 Aug 2026, 10:26 UTC≈7,020 views61 reactionsread 31 August 2026

Видео на канале - https://youtu.be/_8BI9iTCZDk ❤️

💘32🔥1810👻1

15 Aug 2026, 10:11 UTC≈6,790 views59 reactions8 Starsread 31 August 2026

Всем привет! Завтра на ютуб планирую выложить видео если все сложится) И сегодня стримчик день 2 деревни в 15:00

👍4311👌4🤡1

Showing the 12 most recent of 39 posts we hold for @skhedrust. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

23 Aug 2026, 12:47 UTCAnonymous Poll2,170 voters approx.

Что делаем?

  1. Текстом и оригинальный голос.79%
  2. ИИ озвучка24%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 39 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 31 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 939,698 of 1,629,452 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

MAGIC RUST
@magicrust · 106,931
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 15 August 2026
CheZee
@papachez_official · 155,687
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Shked” (@skhedrust), 15,563 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/skhedrust.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.