Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Коммунальный опер👨‍🔧

Channel

Коммунальный опер👨‍🔧

@samarskykray

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

14,678subscribers

-1,410 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001268558658
TypeChannel
Username@samarskykray
Created1 September 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 November 2026
Measurements held57
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/samarskykray

Topic

Local community — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

14,65516,09015,372.56 August 2026 — 16,088 subscribers6 August 2026 — 16,090 subscribers7 August 2026 — 16,085 subscribers8 August 2026 — 16,071 subscribers9 August 2026 — 16,055 subscribers10 August 2026 — 16,037 subscribers11 August 2026 — 16,040 subscribers12 August 2026 — 16,031 subscribers13 August 2026 — 16,025 subscribers14 August 2026 — 16,021 subscribers16 August 2026 — 16,008 subscribers17 August 2026 — 15,996 subscribers18 August 2026 — 15,990 subscribers19 August 2026 — 15,642 subscribers20 August 2026 — 15,689 subscribers22 August 2026 — 15,682 subscribers25 August 2026 — 15,669 subscribers26 August 2026 — 15,667 subscribers27 August 2026 — 15,672 subscribers27 August 2026 — 15,675 subscribers28 August 2026 — 15,674 subscribers29 August 2026 — 15,669 subscribers30 August 2026 — 15,667 subscribers31 August 2026 — 15,651 subscribers1 September 2026 — 15,653 subscribers2 September 2026 — 15,688 subscribers4 September 2026 — 15,714 subscribers7 September 2026 — 15,723 subscribers10 September 2026 — 15,480 subscribers14 September 2026 — 15,473 subscribers16 September 2026 — 15,475 subscribers18 September 2026 — 15,466 subscribers30 September 2026 — 15,125 subscribers5 October 2026 — 15,099 subscribers10 October 2026 — 15,110 subscribers13 October 2026 — 15,102 subscribers14 October 2026 — 15,097 subscribers15 October 2026 — 15,099 subscribers16 October 2026 — 15,097 subscribers17 October 2026 — 15,090 subscribers18 October 2026 — 15,070 subscribers19 October 2026 — 14,678 subscribers21 October 2026 — 14,676 subscribers24 October 2026 — 14,677 subscribers24 October 2026 — 14,659 subscribers26 October 2026 — 14,656 subscribers27 October 2026 — 14,658 subscribers28 October 2026 — 14,655 subscribers28 October 2026 — 14,669 subscribers29 October 2026 — 14,665 subscribers30 October 2026 — 14,663 subscribers1 November 2026 — 14,664 subscribers2 November 2026 — 14,674 subscribers2 November 2026 — 14,683 subscribers4 November 2026 — 14,682 subscribers5 November 2026 — 14,677 subscribers7 November 2026 — 14,678 subscribers14,6786 August 20267 November 2026
57 measurements spanning 93 days, net -1,410. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,440–16,305 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 57
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Nov 2026, 00:4614,678+1
5 Nov 2026, 22:1814,677-5
4 Nov 2026, 23:3014,682-1
2 Nov 2026, 22:1814,683+9
2 Nov 2026, 01:2014,674+10
1 Nov 2026, 00:2814,664+1
30 Oct 2026, 23:3514,663-2
29 Oct 2026, 20:3614,665-4
28 Oct 2026, 23:3014,669+14
28 Oct 2026, 00:1614,655-3
27 Oct 2026, 00:4714,658+2
26 Oct 2026, 00:2714,656-3
24 Oct 2026, 21:5614,659-18
24 Oct 2026, 01:0714,677+1
21 Oct 2026, 20:2014,676-2
19 Oct 2026, 12:1014,678-392
18 Oct 2026, 15:2715,070-20
17 Oct 2026, 17:1615,090-7
16 Oct 2026, 20:2715,097-2
15 Oct 2026, 23:5515,099first reading

Engagement

292 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 71 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
18.1%
avg views ÷ 14,678 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,660
37 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.587%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
39
of 292 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 32 of 37 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held292 (4 August 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total98,376
Reactions total515
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 18:21 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
20m 17s
Average length
45s

Measured directly from 27 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

3,145 reactions across 219 posts, in 52 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 14.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤46714.8%
🔥36911.7%
👏2859.06%
😁2768.78%
🤣2166.87%
🥰2046.49%
💯1695.37%
🤬1695.37%
🤯1585.02%
💊1264.01%
👍1003.18%
😢782.48%
🙏712.26%
😱531.69%
🤔501.59%
😡451.43%
🎉431.37%
🥴331.05%
🕊270.859%
☃170.541%
32 further kinds1896.01%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 235 of the 292 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,255 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 292 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 289 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @samarskykray. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 292 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 6 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
0.685%
2 of 292 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
2
posts carrying an erid · 2 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
2,290
over 2 measured posts
Median views · rest
3,180
over 287 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2VtzquzmM1g15 November 20265 November 2026
2VtzqxTep3D126 August 202626 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 292 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 6 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 39 posts held from the last 30 days (7.69%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

6 Nov 2026, 14:29 UTC≈1,850 views9 reactionsread 6 November 2026

👆 Как человек, который немного в курсе происходящего, во многом согласна.

💯5❤2👏2

6 Nov 2026, 14:29 UTC≈1,800 views10 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Общественники, которые топят за сохранения деревьев около сетей, горите в аду. И блогеры тоже. Вчера произошло то, что весь город и пригород встал на уши. Из-за одного долбанного дерева. Высоковольтка вылетела. Так мне диспетчер Россетей сказал. И расплачиваются люди. У кого нет генератора, дом может легко разморозится. Счастье, что нет сильных морозов. Почти сутки с аварией работяги справится не могут. Считаю, ч…

👏3❤2💊2🔥2😁1

6 Nov 2026, 11:33 UTC≈2,090 views33 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

Я/Мы Вячеслав Филимонов 😆 Теперь я его фанат. Аккуратнее - много нецензурных, но вполне оправданных многолетними бессмысленными собраниями слов.

🤣16😁10🔥7

6 Nov 2026, 07:09 UTC≈2,220 views22 reactionsread 6 November 2026

#нампишут Добрый день! Крик души Хотелось бы написать по поводу парковки на улице Степана Разина. С сегодняшнего дня от Венцека до Пионерской сделали одностороннее движение, повесили кирпич. Около Школы 63, сделали знак остановка запрещена! Т.е. родитель, который привез ребенка в школу даже не может остановиться и высадить ребенка! Уже нарисовали тут платную парковку. Вопрос: учителя многие живут не около школы, е…

👏10🤔5💯4😡3

6 Nov 2026, 06:56 UTC≈2,190 views12 reactionsread 6 November 2026

#нампишут Сегодня погода просто пробирает до костей. И в такие моменты сердце сжимается, когда видишь их... Наш частный сектор, к сожалению, не исключение. На помойках, дрожа от холода и страха, иногда мелькают бездомные собаки. Смотришь на них, и видно, что они не злые, просто потерянные и несчастные. Взять к себе - не вариант, но и пройти мимо жалко. Соседи, когда видят, что я их кормлю, ругаются и грозятся вызват…

🤔4❤3🤬2👻1🗿1🙈1

6 Nov 2026, 04:55 UTC≈2,160 views16 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Ну, что за сказка за окном! Прелесть. Доброе утро всем ❤️

❤10🥰3👏2🤩1

5 Nov 2026, 18:49 UTC≈2,330 views12 reactionsread 6 November 2026

На завтра у нас, по прогнозу ГУ МЧС, очень сильный снег, сильное налипание снега, на дорогах снежные заносы. В общем, снег vs мы. Держимся 🤝

☃7🎅2🤔2🎄1

5 Nov 2026, 17:21 UTC≈2,470 views12 reactionsread 6 November 2026

По сообщению пожарных, ветка дерева упала на провода, замкнуло. Загорелась ветка. Пожарные на месте. Ликвидация в 20.50 https://t.me/samchat63/198437

🤔7🤯2😐2🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 292 posts we hold for @samarskykray. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 14 posts on @samarskykray as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
7 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
4 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
2 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

2 Nov 2026, 12:31 UTCAnonymous Poll309 voters

Кого бы вы хотели видеть на должности мэра Самары

  1. Владимир Василенко34%
  2. Елена Лапушкина10%
  3. Олег Фурсов11%
  4. Данил Морозов9%
  5. Евгений Владимирский12%
  6. Анатолий Пальто15%
  7. Свой вариант в комментариях 👇12%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 292 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 6 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Штефан знает!
@shtefanksenia · 25,737
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 13 September 2026
БАНДИТСКАЯ САМАРА
@banditskayasamara · 28,827
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 9 September 2026
Злой самаритянин
@zloysamarityanin · 34,222
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 3 September 2026
63.RU | НОВОСТИ САМАРЫ | ТОЛЬЯТТИ
@news63ru · 58,531
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 22 August 2026
VOLGA.brief
@volgabrief · 39,522
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 31 August 2026
Убежище Самара
@samara · 57,555
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 22 August 2026
Самара и Самарская губерния
@live_63 · 37,439
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 31 August 2026
Самара ДТП | samara.dtp.official
@samaradtp · 99,959
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 15 August 2026
Воронцова вещает 🦊
@vorontsova63ru · 31,011
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 6 September 2026
Подслушано Самара🐐
@psamara · 40,600
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 30 August 2026
Самара №1
@samaratg01 · 24,783
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 15 September 2026

This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Коммунальный опер👨‍🔧” (@samarskykray), 14,678 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/samarskykray.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.