Posted without readable text

Channel
Коммунальный опер👨🔧
@samarskykray
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
14,678subscribers
-1,410 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001268558658 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @samarskykray |
| Created | 1 September 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 57 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/samarskykray |
Topic
Local community — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Nov 2026, 00:46 | 14,678 | +1 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 22:18 | 14,677 | -5 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 23:30 | 14,682 | -1 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 22:18 | 14,683 | +9 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 01:20 | 14,674 | +10 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 00:28 | 14,664 | +1 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 23:35 | 14,663 | -2 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 20:36 | 14,665 | -4 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 23:30 | 14,669 | +14 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 00:16 | 14,655 | -3 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 00:47 | 14,658 | +2 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 00:27 | 14,656 | -3 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 21:56 | 14,659 | -18 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 01:07 | 14,677 | +1 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 20:20 | 14,676 | -2 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 12:10 | 14,678 | -392 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 15:27 | 15,070 | -20 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 17:16 | 15,090 | -7 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 20:27 | 15,097 | -2 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 23:55 | 15,099 | first reading |
Engagement
292 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 71 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 18.1%
- avg views ÷ 14,678 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,660
- 37 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.587%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 39
- of 292 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 32 of 37 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 292 (4 August 2026 – 6 November 2026) |
| Views total | 98,376 |
| Reactions total | 515 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Nov 2026, 18:21 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 20m 17s
- Average length
- 45s
Measured directly from 27 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3,145 reactions across 219 posts, in 52 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 14.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 467 | 14.8% | |
| 🔥 | 369 | 11.7% | |
| 👏 | 285 | 9.06% | |
| 😁 | 276 | 8.78% | |
| 🤣 | 216 | 6.87% | |
| 🥰 | 204 | 6.49% | |
| 💯 | 169 | 5.37% | |
| 🤬 | 169 | 5.37% | |
| 🤯 | 158 | 5.02% | |
| 💊 | 126 | 4.01% | |
| 👍 | 100 | 3.18% | |
| 😢 | 78 | 2.48% | |
| 🙏 | 71 | 2.26% | |
| 😱 | 53 | 1.69% | |
| 🤔 | 50 | 1.59% | |
| 😡 | 45 | 1.43% | |
| 🎉 | 43 | 1.37% | |
| 🥴 | 33 | 1.05% | |
| 🕊 | 27 | 0.859% | |
| ☃ | 17 | 0.541% | |
| 32 further kinds | 189 | 6.01% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 235 of the 292 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,255 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 292 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 7
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 7
- of 289 we hold a reading for · 2%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @samarskykray. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 292 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 6 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
- Ad load
- 0.685%
- 2 of 292 posts carry an ad marker
- Regulatory tokens
- 2
- posts carrying an erid · 2 distinct tokens
- Median views · ads
- 2,290
- over 2 measured posts
- Median views · rest
- 3,180
- over 287 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2VtzquzmM1g | 1 | 5 November 2026 | 5 November 2026 |
| 2VtzqxTep3D | 1 | 26 August 2026 | 26 August 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 292 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 6 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 39 posts held from the last 30 days (7.69%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
👆 Как человек, который немного в курсе происходящего, во многом согласна.
💯5❤2👏2
Общественники, которые топят за сохранения деревьев около сетей, горите в аду. И блогеры тоже. Вчера произошло то, что весь город и пригород встал на уши. Из-за одного долбанного дерева. Высоковольтка вылетела. Так мне диспетчер Россетей сказал. И расплачиваются люди. У кого нет генератора, дом может легко разморозится. Счастье, что нет сильных морозов. Почти сутки с аварией работяги справится не могут. Считаю, ч…
👏3❤2💊2🔥2😁1
Я/Мы Вячеслав Филимонов 😆 Теперь я его фанат. Аккуратнее - много нецензурных, но вполне оправданных многолетними бессмысленными собраниями слов.
🤣16😁10🔥7
#нампишут Добрый день! Крик души Хотелось бы написать по поводу парковки на улице Степана Разина. С сегодняшнего дня от Венцека до Пионерской сделали одностороннее движение, повесили кирпич. Около Школы 63, сделали знак остановка запрещена! Т.е. родитель, который привез ребенка в школу даже не может остановиться и высадить ребенка! Уже нарисовали тут платную парковку. Вопрос: учителя многие живут не около школы, е…
👏10🤔5💯4😡3
#нампишут Сегодня погода просто пробирает до костей. И в такие моменты сердце сжимается, когда видишь их... Наш частный сектор, к сожалению, не исключение. На помойках, дрожа от холода и страха, иногда мелькают бездомные собаки. Смотришь на них, и видно, что они не злые, просто потерянные и несчастные. Взять к себе - не вариант, но и пройти мимо жалко. Соседи, когда видят, что я их кормлю, ругаются и грозятся вызват…
🤔4❤3🤬2👻1🗿1🙈1
Posted without readable text
Ну, что за сказка за окном! Прелесть. Доброе утро всем ❤️
❤10🥰3👏2🤩1
Posted without readable text
На завтра у нас, по прогнозу ГУ МЧС, очень сильный снег, сильное налипание снега, на дорогах снежные заносы. В общем, снег vs мы. Держимся 🤝
☃7🎅2🤔2🎄1
По сообщению пожарных, ветка дерева упала на провода, замкнуло. Загорелась ветка. Пожарные на месте. Ликвидация в 20.50 https://t.me/samchat63/198437
🤔7🤯2😐2🔥1
Posted without readable text
Showing the 12 most recent of 292 posts we hold for @samarskykray. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 14 posts on @samarskykray as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 7 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 4 November 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 2 days
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 1
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Кого бы вы хотели видеть на должности мэра Самары
- Владимир Василенко34%
- Елена Лапушкина10%
- Олег Фурсов11%
- Данил Морозов9%
- Евгений Владимирский12%
- Анатолий Пальто15%
- Свой вариант в комментариях 👇12%
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 292 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 6 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@shtefanksenia · 25,7376 postsЗаписки провинциальной журналистки
@ZPJ_SO · 1391 postБАНДИТСКАЯ САМАРА
@banditskayasamara · 28,8271 postПЛЯКИН
@plyakin · 1,4921 postРепортёр Папилкин
@poslevkusiepapilkina · 6,1261 postСАМАРА life
@samara_life63 · 18,9871 post"Северный человек" Самара
@samarasevchelovek · 6,4231 postМусорные акценты
@trueforpeople · 3391 postТурков против
@turkov_protiv · 1161 postВолжский рейв
@volgarave · 24,1541 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@fedorishchev_official · 25,71413 postsШтефан знает!
@shtefanksenia · 25,7376 postsБлаготворительный Фонд "Заря"
@zaryabf · 1303 postsНаталья Артякова || Самара
@artyakova · 1,4442 postsБАНДИТСКАЯ САМАРА
@banditskayasamara · 28,8272 posts63.RU | НОВОСТИ САМАРЫ | ТОЛЬЯТТИ
@news63ru · 58,5312 postsЗащита Прав Женщин и Детей🇷🇺.
@ZashitaPravDetei · 355,0681 postЕЩЁ Самара
@eshcho_samara · 4,2961 postЭстетика дома. Вдохновение пространством.
@estet_doma · 1311 postЕвгений Зиновьев | 63.RU
@ezinoviev · 3,3021 postЕкатерина Колотовкина |ОП РФ | КСВО
@geroi_samara · 9,9031 postPROБобин
@probobin · 3641 postСамарский проводник и трубач
@provodniktrubach · 4311 postАлексей Томчук | Сила в людях
@tomchuk_people · 9831 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@shtefanksenia · 25,7377 postsБАНДИТСКАЯ САМАРА
@banditskayasamara · 28,8274 postsПапка для губернатора. Самарская область
@truesamara · 3314 postsСамарские новостройки
@samnewbuild · 17,0913 postsВолжский рейв
@volgarave · 24,1542 postsЦыц!
@cicrf · 2,7551 postЕвгений Зиновьев | 63.RU
@ezinoviev · 3,3021 postКриптоХомяки
@notcoinhamstercatizen · 5521 postРестобар СУДАКЪ
@sudak_samara · 6681 postФантом 63 (отец солдата)
@ufonewstlt · 861 postЗаписки провинциальной журналистки
@ZPJ_SO · 1391 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@zaryabf · 1304 postsБАНДИТСКАЯ САМАРА
@banditskayasamara · 28,8273 postsШтефан знает!
@shtefanksenia · 25,7373 postsСамарские новостройки
@samnewbuild · 17,0912 postsАлексей Томчук | Сила в людях
@tomchuk_people · 9832 postsАрхитектурные излишества
@arkhlikbez · 123,4801 postЧП САМАРА
@chp_samara · 265,3291 postЕЩЁ Самара
@eshcho_samara · 4,2961 postЕкатерина Колотовкина |ОП РФ | КСВО
@geroi_samara · 9,9031 postОлег Комаров
@komarov163 · 1,8111 postМихаил Матвеев коммент
@matveevkomment · 59,6811 postРепортёр Папилкин
@poslevkusiepapilkina · 6,1261 postСамарский Губернский рынок
@Sam_guber · 1,2121 postКомсомольская правда: KP.RU
@truekpru · 283,0941 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@shtefanksenia · 25,737
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 13 September 2026
@banditskayasamara · 28,827
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 9 September 2026
@zloysamarityanin · 34,222
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 3 September 2026
@news63ru · 58,531
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 22 August 2026
@volgabrief · 39,522
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 31 August 2026
@samara · 57,555
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 22 August 2026
@live_63 · 37,439
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 31 August 2026
@samaradtp · 99,959
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 15 August 2026
@vorontsova63ru · 31,011
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 6 September 2026
@psamara · 40,600
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 30 August 2026
@samaratg01 · 24,783
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 15 September 2026
This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Коммунальный опер👨🔧” (@samarskykray), 14,678 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/samarskykray.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.