Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ПЛЯКИН

Channel

ПЛЯКИН

@plyakin

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cross-platform identity · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry

1,532subscribers

+28 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001349935437
TypeChannel
Username@plyakin
Created23 June 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/plyakin

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,4971,5321,514.56 August 2026 — 1,504 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,504 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,505 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,508 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,510 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,508 subscribers19 August 2026 — 1,505 subscribers22 August 2026 — 1,500 subscribers25 August 2026 — 1,497 subscribers28 August 2026 — 1,498 subscribers31 August 2026 — 1,497 subscribers9 September 2026 — 1,516 subscribers12 September 2026 — 1,528 subscribers16 September 2026 — 1,532 subscribers6 August 202616 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 42 days, net +28. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,492–1,537 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 20:001,532+4
12 Sept 2026, 19:001,528+12
9 Sept 2026, 06:211,516+19
31 Aug 2026, 18:561,497-1
28 Aug 2026, 14:331,498+1
25 Aug 2026, 22:381,497-3
22 Aug 2026, 13:341,500-5
19 Aug 2026, 11:461,505-3
16 Aug 2026, 17:131,508-2
13 Aug 2026, 03:271,510+2
9 Aug 2026, 21:111,508+3
6 Aug 2026, 22:561,505+1
6 Aug 2026, 07:451,504no change
6 Aug 2026, 04:371,504first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
57s
Average length
29s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

441 reactions across 16 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
9321.1%
🔥6815.4%
👍6013.6%
💯5813.2%
👏347.71%
❤‍🔥276.12%
🙈173.85%
🤣173.85%
🤬102.27%
🤯92.04%
🤝81.81%
61.36%
😁51.13%
🕊40.907%
😐40.907%
😱40.907%
🙏40.907%
💩30.68%
🏆20.454%
🤡20.454%
5 further kinds61.36%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 536 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 18 we hold a reading for · 17%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @plyakin. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 16:14 UTC84 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Очень надеюсь, что Джастас Уолкер («Веселый молочник») просто неправильно понял или перевел полученную информацию, и никакого выдворения в итоге не будет. Человек, который почти всю сознательную жизнь живет в России, честно работает на земле, создает рабочие места, платит налоги, вкладывает свои сбережения в развитие фермерского хозяйства и своим примером показывает, что можно жить и развивать село. Именно таких люд

💯6❤‍🔥4👍41😱1

6 Aug 2026, 09:15 UTC316 views50 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

Теперь уже точно - ВСЕ. Закон ПОДПИСАН Президентом России. И уже совсем скоро он вступит в силу. Для меня это особенная история. Почти четыре года моей работы: обсуждения, сопротивления, поправки, прохождение всех стадий. И я искренне рад, что теперь еще больше людей будут защищены от мошенников. Но самое главное - они смогут быть вовремя предупреждены. Иногда именно одно своевременное уведомление помогает предотвр

👏21🔥1076👍6

5 Aug 2026, 16:32 UTC270 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @wylsaredPhoto

Только треть мобильных интернет-сессий в первом полугодии была без ограничений С января по июль более 60 % мобильных подключений из ЦФО проходило под белыми списками, — сообщает «КоммерсантЪ». В приграничных регионах хуже всего: в Брянской, Курской, Белгородской областях примерно 90 % подключений происходит под ограничениями. Москва и Санкт-Петербург в этом отношении середнячки. Около 49 % столичных сессий совершал

🤯9😱3🙈31🤬1

4 Aug 2026, 16:42 UTC290 views35 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Ну вот ответьте мне: какая улица, какими бы красивыми ни были ее фасады, может хоть на чуточку сравниться с красотой и величием природы? Сегодняшний закат. Таймлапс. 🌅 🚀 ПЛЯКИН

14🔥10❤‍🔥7💯3custom 52243817132950903941

4 Aug 2026, 10:11 UTC331 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Как же это знакомо 😁 У меня в Самарской области тоже регулярно приходили ответы, в которых на депутатские запросы умудрялись отвечать так, будто к ним обратился гражданин Плякин в порядке 59-ФЗ. Потом я направлял запросы в прокуратуру с просьбой провести проверку, почему игнорируются нормы федерального закона о статусе депутата Государственной Думы. Но прокуратура порой с таким энтузиазмом вставала на защиту регион

👍9🤣5🙈4🔥31

4 Aug 2026, 07:17 UTC261 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @samarskykrayPhoto

#нампишут Вот так у нас проходит незаконная торговля на пешеходке. Начальника отдела потребительского рынка Промышленного района Ашуркова Леонида всё устраивает. На неоднократные обращения, о незаконной торговле отвечает - всё хорошо, реагировать не можем, нет машины... И, наверное, желания.

🤬9🤣3🙈3💩21

4 Aug 2026, 07:14 UTC455 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026

В комментариях пишут, что вопрос с ценами на бензин в Самаре по-прежнему стоит остро. Давайте проверим это на реальных историях. Пришлите в комментариях: 📍 адрес АЗС; 📷 фотографию стелы с актуальными ценами; 🕐 желательно укажите, когда сделан снимок. Сегодня постараюсь заехать на некоторые из этих заправок лично, чтобы проверить ситуацию. После подготовлю и направлю запрос в ФАС с просьбой провести проверку. 🚀 П

👍12🤝7👌1

4 Aug 2026, 05:18 UTC310 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Давно не был на Ленинградской. Там хоть плитку-то ровно уложили? А вот идея сделать Молодогвардейскую пешеходной… Ну не знаю. По набережной гулять - одно удовольствие: Волга, закаты, простор. А просто ходить по улице и любоваться фасадами - ну такое себе. Если есть желание вложить деньги во что-то действительно полезное, то в Самаре, уверен, найдется немало мест, которые давно нуждаются в благоустройстве и ремонте.

💯12👍4🔥31

4 Aug 2026, 04:36 UTC314 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Когда читаешь такие новости, в голову приходит аналогия. Представьте, если бы американский регулятор возбудил дело против АвтоВАЗа или УАЗа за то, что в Ладе не предустановлен американский навигатор, а на спидометре нет разметки в милях. Думаю, наш менеджмент завода в ответ просто покрутил бы пальцем у виска. Мы уже настолько «плотно» интегрированы с зарубежными рынками и производителями, да еще и живем в условиях

💯14🙈7😁31🤔1

1 Aug 2026, 14:54 UTC394 views60 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Каждый раз, когда читаю сообщения людей о том, что они пишут обращения депутатам и не получают никакой реакции, искренне не понимаю, как такое вообще возможно. Да, по закону депутат обязан рассматривать обращения граждан. При этом на практике привлечь депутата к ответственности за отсутствие ответа крайне сложно - для этого сначала необходимо лишить его депутатской неприкосновенности. Но для меня это всегда был вопр

34👍11❤‍🔥8🔥2🕊2🤮2💩1

1 Aug 2026, 14:12 UTC386 views35 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Вот такие добрые слова особенно приятно читать в выходной день. Спасибо всем органам и специалистам, которые приняли законное и справедливое решение. Значит, все было не зря. 🚀 ПЛЯКИН

21🔥7🙏4👍3

31 Jul 2026, 19:03 UTC431 views34 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Василий «Пельмень» Камоцкий нокаутировал поляка Давида Залевского после того, как тот перед боем назвал его курвой. Кажется, в Международной федерации хоккея именно таких кадров и опасаются 😁 Переживают чтобы после финальной сирены не пришлось так же грустно смотреть на табло. Василия Камоцкого - с убедительной ПОБЕДОЙ! Нормально, как говорится, объяснил без лишних слов 💪 ✴️ даже бы сказал: по щам надавал 😁👍 🚀 П

🔥14🤣94👏4🏆2❤‍🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @plyakin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 15 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

САРДАНА
@RealSardana · 30,302
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 7 September 2026
Владимир Гутенев
@gutenev_vv · 45,071
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 September 2026
НЕЧАЕВ
@nechaev_official · 36,899
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 1 September 2026
Партия «Новые люди»
@partynewpeople · 82,860
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 18 August 2026
СТРОЙХЛАМ
@sergei_petrusha · 24,995
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 15 September 2026
Злой самаритянин
@zloysamarityanin · 34,588
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 3 September 2026
VOLGA.brief
@volgabrief · 39,569
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 31 August 2026
Горячева ДЕЛО говорит
@DeputatGoryacheva · 66,072
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 20 August 2026
Станислав Дружинин: правда о важном
@svdruzhinin · 31,897
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 7 September 2026
БАНДИТСКАЯ САМАРА
@banditskayasamara · 28,765
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 9 September 2026

This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cross-platform identity — Wikidata

A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.

Q108898811 on Wikidata, read 13 September 2026
LabelVladimir Plyakin
DescriptionRussian politician
X / Twitter@plyakinvv

Referenced elsewhere

This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.

Wikipedia

One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.

Плякин, Владимир Владимирович (ru.wikipedia.org)
“…автограф = Подпись Плякина Владимира Владимировича.png | сайт = https://t.me/plyakin }} '''Владимир Владимирович Плякин''' (род. [[19 сентября]] [[1981 год]]а…”
read 13 September 2026

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ПЛЯКИН” (@plyakin), 1,532 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/plyakin.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.