Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Виктор Савюк. Бизнес на миллиард

Channel

Виктор Савюк. Бизнес на миллиард

@savyuk_mentor

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry

7,151subscribers

-115 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001703997643
TypeChannel
Username@savyuk_mentor
DescriptionКанал для основателей и ТОПов, которые хотят построить реально большой бизнес. Подпишитесь и узнайте, как: • кратно расти и не останавливаться • собрать крутую команду • наладить процессы Начните отсюда: t.me/savyuk_mentor/405 Контакт: @VictorSavyuk
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held23
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/savyuk_mentor

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 39% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

7,1517,2667,208.56 August 2026 — 7,266 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,266 subscribers9 August 2026 — 7,256 subscribers12 August 2026 — 7,242 subscribers15 August 2026 — 7,231 subscribers18 August 2026 — 7,217 subscribers21 August 2026 — 7,208 subscribers25 August 2026 — 7,192 subscribers27 August 2026 — 7,194 subscribers30 August 2026 — 7,189 subscribers7 September 2026 — 7,185 subscribers12 September 2026 — 7,227 subscribers15 September 2026 — 7,216 subscribers29 September 2026 — 7,188 subscribers6 October 2026 — 7,181 subscribers12 October 2026 — 7,175 subscribers16 October 2026 — 7,178 subscribers22 October 2026 — 7,172 subscribers25 October 2026 — 7,176 subscribers28 October 2026 — 7,189 subscribers31 October 2026 — 7,168 subscribers3 November 2026 — 7,154 subscribers6 November 2026 — 7,151 subscribers6 August 20266 November 2026
23 measurements spanning 91 days, net -115. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,134–7,283 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 23
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Nov 2026, 02:277,151-3
3 Nov 2026, 10:467,154-14
31 Oct 2026, 06:377,168-21
28 Oct 2026, 00:587,189+13
25 Oct 2026, 08:017,176+4
22 Oct 2026, 16:487,172-6
16 Oct 2026, 05:567,178+3
12 Oct 2026, 21:307,175-6
6 Oct 2026, 10:217,181-7
29 Sept 2026, 09:377,188-28
15 Sept 2026, 23:017,216-11
12 Sept 2026, 03:587,227+42
7 Sept 2026, 15:187,185-4
30 Aug 2026, 17:567,189-5
27 Aug 2026, 14:497,194+2
25 Aug 2026, 00:047,192-16
21 Aug 2026, 10:067,208-9
18 Aug 2026, 17:477,217-14
15 Aug 2026, 07:427,231-11
12 Aug 2026, 09:237,242first reading

Engagement

50 posts held, back to 3 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.2%
avg views ÷ 7,151 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,080
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.75%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 50 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held50 (3 July 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total16,269
Reactions total448
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Nov 2026, 02:12 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
36
Videos
60
Links
301

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
2h 04m
Average length
4m 58s

Measured directly from 25 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,487 reactions across 50 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤41728.0%
👍40026.9%
🔥37425.2%
🙏1016.79%
🤣624.17%
👏553.70%
💯463.09%
🤝302.02%
👎20.134%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 50 of the 50 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,487 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 50 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
419
across the posts below
Posts paid on
21
of 50 we hold a reading for · 42%
Most on one post
386
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @savyuk_mentor. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 50 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 July 2026 to 6 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 15 posts held from the last 30 days (6.67%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

6 Nov 2026, 07:37 UTC445 views15 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Video

Все ли проблемы компании идут от собственника? 🔊 Вопрос с прямого эфира «Виктор отвечает» По большому счёту, да. И счастье, и несчастье компании – всё от собственника. Для начала, есть понятие «ловушка основателя». Это когда компания перерастает собственника, а он продолжает ею рулить. Я однажды наблюдал это изнутри. Был эдвайзером компании с прекрасным потенциалом. Собственник даже понимал, что нужен сильный CEO,…

🔥6👍4💯3❤2

5 Nov 2026, 07:37 UTC644 views47 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Мне не хватает времени ✏️ Дел всё больше, времени всё меньше. Только за день раскидал, утром обновил список, а меньше не стало. Не успел сделать одно дело, как сразу не успел сделать другое. Главный вопрос тайм-менеджмента: как успевать решать все задачи? И это неправильный вопрос. Правильный такой: откуда берутся ваши задачи? Прежде чем их решать, надо же сначала их поставить. Согласны? Тогда вот заход посложнее:…

❤23🔥13💯5🤝5🙏1

1 Nov 2026, 03:37 UTC≈1,020 views18 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Video

Всех непричастных с Хэллоуином Вот так моя дочка нарядила своего малыша к празднику! Я за древностию лет Хеллоуин не понимаю, но радуюсь, когда дети радуются. Чем бы дитя не тешилось… Хотя дитям уже за 30 🙂 Кстати, вы празднуете Хэллоуин? Понимаете его? А кто знает его русский аналог? Поделитесь в комментах. #мои_истории

🔥14❤2🙏2

31 Oct 2026, 07:37 UTC≈1,060 views67 reactions2 Starsread 7 November 2026
Video

Закрыл гештальт, сходил на Deep Purple 🔥 Вообще-то давно нужно было, парни как бы не молодеют. Да всё не мог собраться. А тут: я в Цюрихе, они в Цюрихе, ну и срослось. Пригласил дочку! Для Машки это, конечно, из серии «провести с папой вечер». Тем интересней реакция: откровенно восхищалась, как они играли. И реально круто, я прям кайф словил. Правда, она смущалась, когда Гиллан не попадал в ноты. Ну да, вокал у не…

🔥38👍14❤12🙏3

30 Oct 2026, 07:37 UTC≈1,010 views22 reactions386 Starsread 7 November 2026

Байки из личного опыта ✏️ Позвали меня в один Совет директоров. Я независимый. Остальные пять собственников. Кто в теме, тот понимает: это, в общем-то, смертельный трюк. Оборот компании – пара миллиардов. Чёткое, налаженное бюджетирование и контроль его исполнения. Но есть нюансы. ⏩ Первый нюанс: никаких МСФО и близко нет. Типа «это всё придумал Черчилль в 18-м году». Есть авторский БДР, баланс и что-то вроде ОДДС…

🔥10👍8👏3🙏1

28 Oct 2026, 07:37 UTC≈1,060 views14 reactions1 Starread 7 November 2026
Video

Как CFO управлять рабочим капиталом 🔊 Вопрос с прямого эфира «Виктор отвечает» Задача управления рабочим капиталом – одна из самых сложных в моей практике. ➖Во-первых, потому что чаще всего нужно сначала финансовый учёт наладить. ➖Во-вторых, потому что руководить процессом должен CEO, а он обычно в этом не разбирается. Кстати, грубая ошибка: поручать эту задачу CFO, потому что он не может ставить KPI ТОП-менеджерам…

🔥6👍5🙏3

26 Oct 2026, 07:37 UTC≈1,040 views17 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Быстрый рост или кризис: как оценивать эффективность изменений ✏️ Когда вы собственник или CEO, ваши ресурсы распределяются примерно так: ➖Если бизнес спокойно растёт на 15% в год, вы 90% времени тратите на рутину и 10% на изменения. И по деньгам примерно так же. ➖Если же вы растёте на 50–100% в год, то по времени уже 50/50, а по деньгам так и вообще 30/70. ➖А если вы в кризисе, то уже 70% уходит на работу с изменен…

👍9❤4🔥3🙏1

23 Oct 2026, 07:37 UTC≈1,160 views16 reactions1 Starread 7 November 2026
Video

Что делать, если старая команда сопротивляется системным процессам? 🔊 Вопрос с прямого эфира «Виктор отвечает» Вот детали: Вы пытаетесь структурировать бизнес, вводите регламенты, описываете процессы, устанавливаете CRM, ERP, другой полезный софт. А команда этому сопротивляется. Почему? ⏩Мой ответ смотри на видео. Если в Телеграме не грузится, попробуйте видео ВК или YouTube Еще почитать: – Кто в компании отвечае…

❤5💯4🙏4👍3

21 Oct 2026, 07:37 UTC≈1,170 views12 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Video

Как проверить репутацию инвестора? 🔊 Вопрос с прямого эфира «Виктор отвечает» ⏩Мой ответ смотри на видео. Если в Телеграме не грузится, попробуйте видео ВК или YouTube Еще почитать: – Почему инвесторы не дают денег? – План разговора с инвестором #виктор_отвечает

❤4👍3🔥3👏2

19 Oct 2026, 07:37 UTC≈1,320 views32 reactions1 Starread 7 November 2026

Демотиватор 2. Премия 📌 Парадоксально, но премирование — самый опасный процесс в компании. Именно тут ошибки чаще всего демотивируют людей. Почему? Потому что CEO регулярно нарушают вот эти простые правила: ➖Обязательно. Параметров премирования должно быть не больше четырёх. Меньше — лучше. ➖ Обязательно. Вы должны регулярно, на планёрках, обсуждать с людьми параметры, за которые они премируются. ➖ Обязательно. Все…

👍14❤9🙏6🔥3

17 Oct 2026, 07:37 UTC≈1,180 views76 reactions2 Starsread 7 November 2026

Байки из личного опыта ✏️ Был у меня один бизнес в конце 90-х, который не полетел. Но года полтора я бурно суетился. Разогнал оборот до $100К в месяц, и вот как-то вдруг случилось, что денег впритык. Команда была небольшая, человек шесть. Я натурально собрал их и говорю: — Парни, денег у нас сейчас мало. Есть два варианта: либо платим зарплату, либо делаем закупку. Но если закупку не делаем, то через пару месяцев б…

👍37❤14🤣13💯7🔥3🙏2

16 Oct 2026, 07:37 UTC≈1,140 views27 reactions1 Starread 7 November 2026
Video

Как выбрать бизнес-партнёра и правильно разделить доли? 🔊 Вопрос с прямого эфира «Виктор отвечает» Вот детали: Максим Погорелов добавил, что «партнёрился семь или восемь раз и только с одним человеком сохранил нормальные отношения». Это напомнило мне анекдот. – Доктор, я куда на теле ни ткну пальцем, у меня везде больно. – Да у вас же палец сломан! Я постарался объяснить в ответе, что именно Максим делал не так, к…

👍12🔥6🙏5❤2👏2

Showing the 12 most recent of 50 posts we hold for @savyuk_mentor. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Витрина стартапов
@showstartup · 26,863
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 11 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Referenced elsewhere

This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.

Wikipedia

One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.

Савюк, Виктор Авксентьевич (ru.wikipedia.org)
“…блог для основателей и руководителей бизнесов в Телеграм канале [https://t.me/savyuk_mentor «Бизнес на миллиард»] (с 2024). - Финансирует проекты «[[Старость…”
read 1 November 2026

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Виктор Савюк. Бизнес на миллиард” (@savyuk_mentor), 7,151 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/savyuk_mentor.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.