Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Александр Сайгин

Channel

Александр Сайгин

@saygin_opinion

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

5,716subscribers

-115 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001395657893
TypeChannel
Username@saygin_opinion
Created1 May 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 November 2026
Measurements held26
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/saygin_opinion

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

5,6795,8325,755.56 August 2026 — 5,831 subscribers6 August 2026 — 5,831 subscribers6 August 2026 — 5,832 subscribers9 August 2026 — 5,829 subscribers12 August 2026 — 5,818 subscribers15 August 2026 — 5,816 subscribers18 August 2026 — 5,812 subscribers21 August 2026 — 5,814 subscribers24 August 2026 — 5,809 subscribers28 August 2026 — 5,811 subscribers30 August 2026 — 5,814 subscribers2 September 2026 — 5,810 subscribers7 September 2026 — 5,804 subscribers11 September 2026 — 5,806 subscribers15 September 2026 — 5,795 subscribers30 September 2026 — 5,701 subscribers6 October 2026 — 5,696 subscribers13 October 2026 — 5,699 subscribers16 October 2026 — 5,695 subscribers18 October 2026 — 5,679 subscribers21 October 2026 — 5,708 subscribers25 October 2026 — 5,744 subscribers28 October 2026 — 5,743 subscribers31 October 2026 — 5,738 subscribers3 November 2026 — 5,729 subscribers8 November 2026 — 5,716 subscribers5,7166 August 20268 November 2026
26 measurements spanning 95 days, net -115. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,656–5,855 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Nov 2026, 22:405,716-13
3 Nov 2026, 01:245,729-9
31 Oct 2026, 00:515,738-5
28 Oct 2026, 05:585,743-1
25 Oct 2026, 04:365,744+36
21 Oct 2026, 18:205,708+29
18 Oct 2026, 18:105,679-16
16 Oct 2026, 01:505,695-4
13 Oct 2026, 00:075,699+3
6 Oct 2026, 23:585,696-5
30 Sept 2026, 11:205,701-94
15 Sept 2026, 18:565,795-11
11 Sept 2026, 19:165,806+2
7 Sept 2026, 02:595,804-6
2 Sept 2026, 17:165,810-4
30 Aug 2026, 20:485,814+3
28 Aug 2026, 04:375,811+2
24 Aug 2026, 20:375,809-5
21 Aug 2026, 01:335,814+2
18 Aug 2026, 08:445,812first reading

Engagement

56 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
40.3%
avg views ÷ 5,716 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,300
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.91%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 56 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held56 (25 July 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Views total43,770
Reactions total835
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken4 Nov 2026, 19:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

2,230 reactions across 48 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍97143.5%
🤣72932.7%
👎1004.48%
😢954.26%
😱683.05%
🤬662.96%
custom 5264737672684907396632.83%
🕊602.69%
⚡572.56%
custom 5195158798762786824160.717%
custom 527408334113237446250.224%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 54 of the 56 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,521 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 56 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 19 posts held from the last 30 days (10.5%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

4 Nov 2026, 08:15 UTC≈1,110 views44 reactionsread 4 November 2026

Уже 54 места в Сенате у демократов и 234 в Палате представителей. И 27 губернаторов теперь демократы

👍44

4 Nov 2026, 06:16 UTC≈1,310 views56 reactionsread 4 November 2026

Охохо… Трампулечка отработал как слон (как много в данном случае смыслов) в посудной лавке: Демократы получают большинство в Сенате, занимая 53 места, тогда как республиканцы — 42. Подсчет голосов в пяти штатах продолжается. В Палате представителей на данный момент демократы получают 230 мест, республиканцы - 168. Для получения большинства необходимо не менее 218 мест.

🤣44👍12

4 Nov 2026, 05:16 UTC≈1,370 views5 reactionsread 4 November 2026

Совсем забыл про второй тур выборов президента Болгарии. Там без сюрпризов. Во втором туре со значительным отрывом победила Илияна Йотова. За нее проголосовали 57,566% принявших участие в выборах. Основной соперник Йотовой, Андрей Гюров, набрал 39,483% голосов избирателей. Явка во втором туре незначительно, но выросла. Отдали свой голос во втором туре 1,9 млн болгар против 1,535 млн неделей раньше. Вообще рекомендую…

🕊4👎1

3 Nov 2026, 16:27 UTC≈1,570 views24 reactionsread 4 November 2026

Очень забавно наблюдать раскол между Азербайджаном и Турцией. Смешно, что говорил об этом таксисту из Карабаха, который вез меня до аэропорта Перми полтора месяца назад. Сейчас всё отчётливее видно проговоренное. Спешу однако заметить, что в ближайшие лет пять ни к какой СВО со стороны Турции это не приведёт (им хватает сирийского кейса и других проблем). Поэтому на турецком телевидении не будут кричать, что азербайд…

👍16😱6🤣2

2 Nov 2026, 21:55 UTC≈1,720 views45 reactionsread 4 November 2026

Этак законотворчество в стране просто заглохнет https://t.me/kommersant/118601

🤣36😱8🤬1

2 Nov 2026, 10:26 UTC≈1,750 views15 reactionsread 4 November 2026

От этого шарахался сам дьявол в Преисподней https://t.me/my_yandex_wallet/12744

👍10🤣5

2 Nov 2026, 06:58 UTC≈4,220 views20 reactionsread 4 November 2026

В крупных городах-то не везде участковые есть... А что, кстати, с ППС? Вообще удивительно, что вопрос о состоянии общественного порядка практически никак не звучит https://t.me/zakupki_time/70482

🤣16😢3👍1

1 Nov 2026, 21:46 UTC≈1,860 views13 reactionsread 4 November 2026

Пожарский то ли не знает эту теорию, то ли сознательно не упоминает. Речь о том, когда сталкиваются две больших силы, у которых примерно одинаковое число сторонников и на первый план выходит третья, самая слабая, сила. И вот она по итогу может получить дивидендов больше всех. Потому что именно от её представителей зависит, кто будет дальше рулить процессами. России конечно ещё далеко до такого, но что-то мне подсказы…

👍9🤣3😢1

1 Nov 2026, 21:41 UTC≈1,790 views12 reactionsread 4 November 2026

Слава, обрати внимание, что я не обвинял тебя, что ты пишешь чушь и прочую подобную лексику не применял. Просто обозначил, что вижу это несколько по-другому и не вижу тут никакого протеста против власти. Понятно, что некоторые источники (в основном среди уехавших по тем или иным причинам) любое действие, расходящееся с "генеральной линией" будут подавать как протест, но это не он https://t.me/beerriot/3820

👍12

1 Nov 2026, 21:38 UTC≈1,750 views36 reactionsread 4 November 2026

Странный человек Сергей Жуков. Слово в слово повторил всё то же, о чём я написал, но почему-то не согласен. Ещё и возраст приплёл https://t.me/slushayte34/9173

🤣29👍7

1 Nov 2026, 21:07 UTC≈1,720 views18 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Forwarded from @rotfront_1917_1945Photo

Осенью 1918 года, когда западный фронт немцев посыпался, сменилось и правительство. 3 октября новым канцлером стал принц Максимилиан Баденский, которому поручили начать мирные переговоры. 4 октября новое правительство Германии через голову своих европейских противников обратилось к президенту США Вудро Вильсону с предложением: давай мириться. В тот же день о переговорах от своего друга дипломата Гисберта фон Ромбер…

👍9🤣8👎1

1 Nov 2026, 07:23 UTC≈7,400 views75 reactionsread 4 November 2026

Давай я немного поспорю с тобой, потому что в твоём высказывании есть неоднократно уже повторяющаяся методологическая ошибка. На самом деле, празднование Хэллоуина ничего не значит в политическом контексте. Поясню на нескольких аналогичных примерах: 1. Рок-движение в СССР. Некоторое время было принято считать, что рокеры (металлисты, шире - говнари) против власти. И действительно, ряд групп исполняли песни на грани …

👍56👎13custom 52647376726849073965🤣1

Showing the 12 most recent of 56 posts we hold for @saygin_opinion. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 36 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

ПолитСатирКа
@satirkka · 275,971
12 posts
Русский ноу нейм
@llh_778 · 11,815
7 posts
Временное правительство 2.0
@neoreshkins · 28,810
4 posts
Пауки в банке
@bankuyte · 59,248
3 posts
Пивной путч. Кузьменко.
@beerriot · 752
2 posts
Родина слонов
@elephants_motherland · 6,647
2 posts
ГРИЩУК
@grishchuk · 6,803
2 posts
Бульдоги под ковром
@kremlin_bulldogs · 78,453
2 posts
Футляр для курая - КушТау #Куштаубудетжить
@kuraifutlar · 30,310
2 posts
Тележка из Парк Хауса
@park_telegka · 173
2 posts
Рубим сук
@cutthebitch · 328
1 post
Неудаща
@dirtytatarstan · 50,222
1 post
Трезвый политолог
@drunkenpolitolog · 11,468
1 post
Ермилов
@Ermilov_Daniil · 291
1 post
КАК-ТО ВОТ ТАК В СИЗО
@kaktovottakvsizo · 71
1 post
Косачёва_мнение
@kosacheva_mnenie · 1,195
1 post
Информация о политике, выборах и общественной жизни России с точки зрения политического юриста.
@molchanovinfo · 175
1 post
Московская прачечная
@moscow_laundry · 701,017
1 post
Партбилет.35
@partbilet35 · 21,228
1 post
ПолитологОрлов
@politolog_Orlov · 20,699
1 post
Конспиролог енот
@predskazatel_enot · 21
1 post
Абдулина Роза | Время смыслов
@RozaAbdulina · 364
1 post
Сибиряк
@sidpolit · 8,022
1 post
ФАКТЫ НА СТОЛ
@truth_onlytruth · 2,071
1 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Сталингумрак
@volgograd_tg · 44,626
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 27 August 2026
Время госзакупок
@zakupki_time · 24,737
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 15 September 2026
Бізнес-Patriot
@BiznesPatriot · 21,389
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 24 September 2026
Высота V102.RU
@infoV102ru · 20,877
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 25 September 2026
Толкователь
@tolk_tolk · 126,370
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 13 August 2026
Волгоград | Новости | Интересное
@volgodrad_news · 28,223
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 9 September 2026
Деньги и песец
@moneyandpolarfox · 50,909
Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 25 August 2026
Донбасский Кейс
@donbasscase · 55,563
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 22 August 2026
Как бы Mikhail Vinogradov
@Vinogradov74 · 28,093
Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 10 September 2026
ФоРГО
@FoRGO_official · 48,512
Telegram ranks this channel #95 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 26 August 2026

This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Александр Сайгин” (@saygin_opinion), 5,716 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/saygin_opinion.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.