Разбираем вопросы большого бизнеса. Вместе с экспертами делимся решениями, которые позволяют компаниям и менеджерам развиваться. Рассказываем о важном в отраслях и цифровой трансформации.
https://sber.pro
https://max.ru/sberpromedia
Created
Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 28% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
52 measurements spanning 89 days, net +850. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,515–11,683 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 52
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
3 Nov 2026, 06:38
11,546
-2
31 Oct 2026, 05:27
11,548
+2
30 Oct 2026, 06:00
11,546
+57
29 Oct 2026, 05:36
11,489
+148
28 Oct 2026, 01:07
11,341
+105
27 Oct 2026, 03:01
11,236
+81
26 Oct 2026, 01:20
11,155
+14
25 Oct 2026, 03:16
11,141
+39
24 Oct 2026, 03:36
11,102
+116
23 Oct 2026, 00:06
10,986
+60
21 Oct 2026, 20:21
10,926
+28
20 Oct 2026, 14:00
10,898
+14
19 Oct 2026, 17:01
10,884
+4
18 Oct 2026, 19:07
10,880
-4
17 Oct 2026, 17:01
10,884
-4
16 Oct 2026, 18:57
10,888
+4
14 Oct 2026, 14:00
10,884
+24
13 Oct 2026, 06:10
10,860
+52
8 Oct 2026, 23:01
10,808
+17
4 Oct 2026, 13:57
10,791
first reading
Engagement
56 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 41 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
12.8%
avg views ÷ 11,546 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,470
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.678%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 56 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026
Posts held
56 (21 July 2026 – 3 November 2026)
Views total
23,588
Reactions total
160
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Nov 2026, 18:57 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,420
Videos
≈50
Links
≈1,440
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 3 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
478 reactions across 53 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
165
34.5%
👍
150
31.4%
💯
53
11.1%
👏
52
10.9%
🤩
32
6.69%
🤔
20
4.18%
👎
4
0.837%
🥱
2
0.418%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 55 of the 56 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 487 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 56 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 3 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
В III квартале 2026 года уточнены правила расчёта НДС, налогового администрирования и электронного документооборота. Вместе с экспертами Strategy Partners выбрали пять важных изменений для бизнеса.
🔹 Перевозки: обязательные электронные документы
С 1 сентября транспортные и грузовые накладные, заказы и заявки на перевозку, а также экспедиторские документы оформляются в электронном виде через ГИС ЭПД. Исключения допус…
Слаженная команда рассыпается, стоит руководителю уехать в отпуск? Значит, всё держалось на личном контроле. В выпуске подкаста «Займи слот» эксперт по трансформации корпоративной культуры Наталья Артемьева объясняет: фундамент самостоятельной команды — не регламенты, а ежедневные практики.
🔈 Правило 12 повторений
Практики приживаются, когда повторяются в среднем около 12 раз. Лидеры часто поступают как стартаперы: …
Уже 62% компаний тестируют ИИ-агентов, но устойчивый эффект получают не все. Разрыв — не в самой технологии, а в процессах, масштабировании и навыках команды. Собрали пять популярных материалов октября, которые помогают пройти путь от пилота до работающего инструмента.
💠 Корпоративные ИИ-агенты: что им доверить?
ИИ переходит от диалоговых помощников к цифровым исполнителям, способным самостоятельно решать задачи. Ка…
SberPro Tech 2026: как ИИ меняет управление и бизнес
Вчера на SberPro Tech 2026 эксперты обсудили ИИ-агентов, доверие к нейросетям и цифровую трансформацию российского бизнеса. Собрали важное с конференции, а в карточках — ключевые цитаты спикеров.
💠 Рутинные решения — ИИ, исключения — человеку
Современные технологии сокращают цепочку принятия решений: при качественно выстроенной работе с данными до 90% простых зад…
80% российских компаний намерены расширять применение генеративного ИИ
Что мешает масштабировать технологии и какие результаты бизнес уже получает? На SberPro Tech 2026 представили совместное исследование СберПро и TAdviser. Выбрали четыре ключевых вывода для бизнеса.
💠 Данные становятся важнее выбора нейросети
Для 83% крупных организаций главным барьером остается качество корпоративных данных. При этом разрыв межд…
Подключаемся: в 10:00 (по Москве) стартует SberPro Tech 2026
Что будет:
• реальные кейсы цифровой трансформации бизнеса;
• экспертиза от лидеров рынка;
• агентный ИИ для компаний и развития продуктов;
• примеры модернизации цифровой инфраструктуры;
• передовые финтех-инструменты.
Трансляция по кнопке!
Пока компании разрабатывают стратегии внедрения искусственного интеллекта в бизнес-процессы, сотрудники уже применяют нейросети для рабочих задач. Технология настолько полезна, что её не надо навязывать сверху.
Однако здесь-то и кроются риски. Использование публичных сервисов может привести к утечке персональных данных и уникальных корпоративных знаний.
✔️ Где ИИ приносит бизнесу наибольшую практическую пользу?
✔️ …
ИИ в контакт-центрах: как повысить экономическую эффективность
Экономический эффект от ИИ в контакт-центрах российских компаний в 2026 году оценивают примерно в 70 млрд рублей. Но фокус в оценке сервиса смещается: если раньше главным аргументом внедрения была разгрузка операторов и экономия, то теперь контакт-центры рассматривают и как источник выручки. Какие управленческие решения выходят на первый план?
💠 Новые м…
SberPro Tech 2026: технологии, которые меняют бизнес-ландшафт
29 октября состоится SberPro Tech 2026 — конференция, посвящённая стратегиям цифровой трансформации крупного бизнеса. В фокусе: переход к агентному ИИ, развитие инфраструктуры и реальные кейсы лидеров рынка.
Ключевые темы и треки в программе конференции
🔹 Эффективность и операции
Как внедрить ИИ в ежедневные процессы и перестроить операционную модель ко…
От промышленных манипуляторов к физическому ИИ: как меняется роботизация предприятий
33% российских компаний применяют промышленных роботов с ИИ, а 5% — уже перешли от пилотов к полноценным внедрениям. Следующий этап — физический ИИ, где машина не просто действует по заранее заданному сценарию, а может учитывать окружающую обстановку, прогнозировать результат движения и корректировать действия.
Что это значит для б…
👍5👏3💯3
Showing the 12 most recent of 56 posts we hold for @sberpromedia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
СберБизнес @sberbusiness · 235,741 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 11 August 2026
ТВОЙ ПРАЙМ @sber_spasibo · 85,343 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 1 October 2026
СберУниверситет @sber_university · 24,308 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 17 September 2026
СберМобайл @sbermobile_official · 23,685 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 16 September 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“СберПро” (@sberpromedia), 11,546 subscribers as measured 3 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sberpromedia.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.