🤖 A Telegram macOS client developer is testing an AI agent that can take actions inside the messenger, such as reading chats to draft replies or compiling digests from selected channels. The experiment supports ChatGPT, Claude, Grok or a user’s own API, with access through a separate chat or a floating assistant icon. It is not a general release; wider availability depends on community response. 🧩 Telegram message w…

Channel
TON na Kote (EN)
@scroogerslink
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
32,275subscribers
-4,935 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002144249144 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @scroogerslink |
| Description | Channel of Mr.Cat. Partners, Advertisement - @splinter925 Ru Channel - https://t.me/tonnakote |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 59 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/scroogerslink |
Topic
Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 47% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2026, 10:17 | 32,275 | -41 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 08:56 | 32,316 | -49 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 05:40 | 32,365 | -42 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 06:20 | 32,407 | -57 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 02:55 | 32,464 | -66 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 01:27 | 32,530 | -64 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 00:16 | 32,594 | -57 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 23:30 | 32,651 | -58 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 00:40 | 32,709 | -50 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 22:01 | 32,759 | -49 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 20:16 | 32,808 | -39 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 20:19 | 32,847 | -64 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 19:18 | 32,911 | -38 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 20:09 | 32,949 | -73 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 19:08 | 33,022 | -72 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 14:06 | 33,094 | -76 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 12:09 | 33,170 | -90 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 13:16 | 33,260 | -67 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 11:27 | 33,327 | -56 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 13:21 | 33,383 | first reading |
Engagement
84 posts held, back to 21 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 165 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.426%
- avg views ÷ 32,275 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 137
- 58 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.668%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 58
- of 84 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 58 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 84 (21 January 2026 – 5 November 2026) |
| Views total | 7,969 |
| Reactions total | 4 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Nov 2026, 07:56 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 310
- Videos
- 40
- Links
- 154
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 6m 09s
- Average length
- 18s
Measured directly from 21 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
80 reactions across 13 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 29 | 36.3% | |
| ❤ | 19 | 23.8% | |
| 👍 | 18 | 22.5% | |
| 👏 | 9 | 11.3% | |
| 👎 | 4 | 5.00% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 1.25% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 84 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 80 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 84 most recent posts we hold, published 21 January 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 1
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 1
- of 84 we hold a reading for · 1%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @scroogerslink. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 84 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 January 2026 to 5 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 58 posts held from the last 30 days (1.72%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🍭 Tonnel offers a way to cash out an old Gram Earnings balance by transferring it to Tonnel Market. Users receive 80% of the balance and a Lol Pop Gift; balances above 80 GRAM carry a stated 20% commission, while the commission on smaller balances rises as the balance falls. The interface sets a 500 TON limit over a rolling seven-day period. 🤖 Circle will cut 5% of its workforce and replace those roles with AI. 📰 T…
🎁 Telegram’s macOS beta lets on-chain Gifts go in the first crafting slot on the test server. Previously, their numbers could not be carried over to a newly crafted Gift; now it is minted and recorded on-chain again with the original number followed by “C.” 💎 Blockchain.com’s DeFi Wallet has added support for TON and 75 tokens associated with Telegram Gifts.
🔐 The DarkSword exploit has been listed on a gray market for $30,000. Earlier claims linked it to crypto theft from iPhones; now the exploit itself is being offered for sale. ⚠️ BitMart was hacked again, with hackers moving assets to their own wallets. 💎 Binance’s Proof of Reserves addresses and linked wallets currently hold about $150 million in TON-network assets. The reported holdings peaked at $1.4 billion on D…
🧾 Fragment has restored its verification-status section, but its current KYC check applies only to withdrawals of Telegram Stars and Gram Earnings. Purchases of Stars and Premium remain available without verification; only one of 12 server-side need_verify flags is enabled. 🎁 After Redo’s floor fell to 440 GRAM on November 1, it rebounded to 543 GRAM within three days. The cheapest listings were mostly models with g…
🔐 A new iPhone exploit claim says a malicious PDF breached a device even with Lockdown Mode enabled, and that the infection survived an iOS update. It adds a new alleged attack route to earlier claims that iOS exploits were being used to steal crypto. 💵 Fragment now accepts USDT payments on Tron using the TRC-20 standard. The option has moved from testing to availability. 🎁 Telegram changed the Hellspawn model in i…
🔐 Binance said hackers used a fake job interview to compromise an employee’s account and gain access to the company’s internal crypto wallets. The explanation adds a new detail about how the attack reached the wallets. 💻 On November 2, a site called interview-prep published claims that ScamSani was hacked for $10 million, with another $30 million at risk; that Open Builders earned more than $5 million from stickers;…
👛 Fewer than 1,000 Telegram Wallets reportedly hold at least 20 TON; factoring in weekly active users puts the estimated user count at about 300. That measures balances and activity, not simply the number of wallet addresses issued. 🟠 Tether holds about 150,000 BTC, worth more than $11.5 billion, CEO Paolo Ardoino said.
👛 One million Telegram users have now received an address for Telegram Money’s built-in wallet. The count includes addresses with no on-chain activity. 🎃 Telegram’s Halloween Bear Gift was distributed nearly 3 million times in just over three days, at more than 850,000 gifts a day. It passed Valentine Bear to rank tenth among ordinary Gifts by all-time distributions; each Halloween Bear costs 50 Stars. 💵 Fragment i…
👛 Telegram Money’s wallet counter on gram.org neared one million: on November 2 it showed 975,000 addresses, nearly 100,000 more than earlier that day. The count includes newly created addresses with no transfers or other on-chain activity, so it tracks wallets issued—not just wallets already used on-chain. 📈 Securitize has begun trading 13 tokenized stocks on Solana. The new lineup includes GameStop, Salesforce, Ub…
❤1
⚠️ Telegram users received spam restrictions after forwarding a bot message with a button. In a separate case, a moderator was restricted three times in one day while demonstrating a Telegram Gift analytics bot and sharing Gift links in two chats. An appeal lifted the first restriction after about 30 minutes, but two more followed; the moderator’s messages were also deleted from chats where he was not an admin, and p…
👛 As of November 2, Telegram Wallet had not officially launched. The wider access users were seeing reflected an expanded beta-test audience, not a general release. 🧾 Fragment has hidden its KYC section, and accounts without identity verification can again buy Telegram Stars, Telegram Premium and other products. KYC-related code remains in the site build, while the old verification pages redirect to the homepage. ⚙…
Showing the 12 most recent of 84 posts we hold for @scroogerslink. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@wolfa · 2,330#1
@gram · 6,258,010#2
@Bossy_Callz · 13,451#3
@hellokook · 15,945#4
@MakeMoneyWithMattTG · 28,414#5
@MrEduTrades · 11,986#6
@Akatsuki_Calls_x1000 · 6,347#7
@EraOfExplorers · 660,912#8
@EtherHuntChanneL · 1,185#9
@mad_apes_call · 77,721#10
@IROODdesign · 1,929#11
@innovation_station · 2,150#12
@non_political_news · 3,648#13
@financial_reality · 3,259#14
@crypto_hub_crypto_hub · 2,302#15
@Money360_economics · 1,970#16
@mindboost_psychology · 1,178#17
@vresurse_vpotoke · 2,768#18
@Beauty_Health_Hub · 3,107#19
@kulinar_experement · 2,312#20
@dich_ai · 3,219#21
@uefa_conference_league_tg · 2,957#22
@metropolisru · 12,556#23
@joinphantomtdi · 1,164#24
@ForexbyAA · 8,061#25
@amurblg1 · 44,849#26
@Raidbet_reviews · 1,233#27
@GreatnessRussia · 4,402#28
@smivki · 1,212#29
@filosofiya_samuraya · 337#30
@azartlimon · 63,617#31
@sweetoru_nails · 471 (as read 28 September 2026)#32
@kkeongsmemo · 10,593#33
@PlayTokenX · 5,065#34
@mediaskat · 3,718#35
@crypto_click_games · 1,125#36
@DanyaHype1 · 2,447#37
@Token_Chasers · 1,228#38
@MriyaUAnews · 1,651#39
@kebrincryptoexchange · 10,483#40
@byvioletzhu · 1,555#41
@vlast_com · 11,075#42
@emperorcoin · 35,620#43
@husievsviatoslav · 9,815#44
@kogkuo · 603#45
@bathroom_cabinet · 4,582#46
@NinjaAnimeFans · 71#47
@NotiMundoyVzla · 21,348#48
@Raidbet_statistic · 3,552#49
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 28 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@WhalesTON_C · 18,959
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 28 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“TON na Kote (EN)” (@scroogerslink), 32,275 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/scroogerslink.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.