Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 🚂НЕГУДОК. PRO ЖД, РЖД, ППЖТ. СЦ Желдортранс

Channel

🚂НЕГУДОК. PRO ЖД, РЖД, ППЖТ. СЦ Желдортранс

@sczdt

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

13,076subscribers

+33 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001738518899
TypeChannel
Username@sczdt
Created17 March 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 September 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 11 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/sczdt

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 75% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

13,01313,07613,044.56 August 2026 — 13,043 subscribers6 August 2026 — 13,041 subscribers8 August 2026 — 13,042 subscribers8 August 2026 — 13,039 subscribers9 August 2026 — 13,038 subscribers10 August 2026 — 13,035 subscribers11 August 2026 — 13,034 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13,029 subscribers13 August 2026 — 13,028 subscribers14 August 2026 — 13,027 subscribers16 August 2026 — 13,026 subscribers18 August 2026 — 13,023 subscribers19 August 2026 — 13,020 subscribers20 August 2026 — 13,016 subscribers21 August 2026 — 13,015 subscribers24 August 2026 — 13,013 subscribers26 August 2026 — 13,020 subscribers26 August 2026 — 13,025 subscribers29 August 2026 — 13,026 subscribers30 August 2026 — 13,025 subscribers31 August 2026 — 13,029 subscribers1 September 2026 — 13,027 subscribers2 September 2026 — 13,030 subscribers3 September 2026 — 13,033 subscribers8 September 2026 — 13,076 subscribers6 August 20268 September 2026
25 measurements spanning 33 days, net +33. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,004–13,085 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Sept 2026, 10:2113,076+43
3 Sept 2026, 09:3213,033+3
2 Sept 2026, 01:1613,030+3
1 Sept 2026, 04:0313,027-2
31 Aug 2026, 04:0313,029+4
30 Aug 2026, 05:3813,025-1
29 Aug 2026, 03:1513,026+1
26 Aug 2026, 23:4613,025+5
26 Aug 2026, 00:5313,020+7
24 Aug 2026, 22:4713,013-2
21 Aug 2026, 21:5813,015-1
20 Aug 2026, 17:5313,016-4
19 Aug 2026, 20:2613,020-3
18 Aug 2026, 21:3613,023-3
16 Aug 2026, 14:2413,026-1
14 Aug 2026, 21:1713,027-1
13 Aug 2026, 13:5913,028-1
12 Aug 2026, 14:3413,029-5
11 Aug 2026, 17:4313,034-1
10 Aug 2026, 15:1513,035first reading

Engagement

92 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 49 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
31.6%
avg views ÷ 13,076 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,130
59 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.793%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
59
of 92 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held92 (1 August 20262 September 2026)
Views total243,577
Reactions total1,931
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 20:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
8m 43s
Average length
44s

Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,757 reactions across 89 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤯59521.6%
🤔41315.0%
👍31411.4%
🤡2649.58%
😱2639.54%
🔥2428.78%
🤬2037.36%
1495.40%
😁853.08%
😢541.96%
🤷511.85%
🍾321.16%
👏311.12%
💯200.725%
🫡160.58%
130.472%
🏆110.399%
😭10.036%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 92 of the 92 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,797 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 92 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 17:12 UTC907 views14 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @gruppasinaraPhoto

Исполнился год с начала производства поездов для ВСМ Ровно год назад, 2 сентября 2025 года, на заводе «Уральские локомотивы» был дан торжественный старт производству первого российского высокоскоростного электропоезда. Процесс сварки первого кузова вагона высокоскоростного поезда из экструдированного алюминия вместе запустили вице-премьер Правительства РФ Виталий Савельев, министр промышленности и торговли РФ Антон

😁9👍3🔥1😱1

2 Sept 2026, 10:09 UTC≈1,750 views15 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

🟥Южно-Уральская ж. д. СХОД ВАГОНА В ГРУЗОВОМ ПОЕЗДЕ. ⚠️02 сентября 2026 года около 8:30 по местному времени на перегоне Куйбас - Рудная в границах Южно-Уральской железной дороги допущен сход вагона в составе грузового поезда.

🤔10🤯4😱1

2 Sept 2026, 09:32 UTC≈1,680 views4 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @SropromFile

👀 ТУПИК №08 (29) август 2026 Ассоциация "Промжелдортранс" предлагает вашему вниманию очередной выпуск инфобуклета "ТУПИК". Это дайджест ключевых новостей, касающихся железнодорожного транспорта необщего и общего пользования. ❗️Встречайте новый номер "ТУПИКА"! Что внутри: ◽️К 1 сентября: колонка эксперта о подготоке кадров для ж/д отрасли ◽️Новости промышленного ж/д‑транспорта ◽️Актуальная информация для грузоотпра

👍2💯1🔥1

2 Sept 2026, 09:07 UTC≈1,790 views10 reactionsread 2 September 2026

🟥Забайкальская ж. д. ❗️2 сентября 2026 года по причине обвала скальной породы на перегоне Кручина – Новая Забайкальской железной дороги отменены пригородные поезда № 6012 Чита – Карымская и № 6033 Карымская – Чита. ❗️В связи с происшествием пассажирские поезда №376 Чита – Благовещенск и №302 Чита – Приаргунск будут отправлены 3 сентября не ранее 01:00 (здесь и далее время московское) и не ранее 01:10 соответственно

🤔6👍2🤯1😱1

2 Sept 2026, 08:33 UTC≈1,890 views16 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

🔴С МЕСТА СОБЫТИЙ. ➡Ликвидация последствий обвала скальной породы на Забайкальской ж. д. ⚠Размеры человека относительно природной стихии на фото 2 и 3.

🤯8🔥5💯2🤔1

2 Sept 2026, 07:33 UTC≈1,980 views27 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

🟥Забайкальская ж. д. ⚠️С МЕСТА СОБЫТИЙ. ➡️И красиво и страшно одновременно...

🤯18🤔5😱4

2 Sept 2026, 06:33 UTC≈2,110 views19 reactionsread 2 September 2026

❗️О движении поездов на перегоне Кручина – Новая в Забайкальском крае ⚠️2 сентября 2026 года в 06:18 по московскому времени на перегоне Кручина - Новая Забайкальской железной дороги был выявлен обвал скальной породы на железнодорожные пути. ➡️Пострадавших нет. ❗️Движение поездов по перегону временно приостановлено в обоих направлениях. ❗️К месту происшествия направлены восстановительные поезда, спецтехника и сотр

🤔9🤯5🤬3😱2

1 Sept 2026, 16:41 UTC≈2,590 views14 reactionsread 2 September 2026

🔴СТОЛКНОВЕНИЕ ПРИГОРОДНОГО ПОЕЗДА НА ПЕРЕЕЗДЕ ➡Октябрьская ж. д. Лигово - Стрельна . ⚠Водитель легкового автомобиля выехал на железнодорожные пути перед приближающимся пригородным поездом на запрещающий сигнал светофора. ⚠Машинист электропоезда применил экстренное торможение, однако столкновения избежать не удалось. ➡Схода подвижного состава нет.

🤯9😱4🤔1

1 Sept 2026, 11:01 UTC≈2,850 views59 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

🔴Московская ж. д. Ст. Мытищи. ⚠При посадке - высадке пассажиров, разрушилась часть деревянного настила платформы. О пострадавших пока неизвестно.

🤯34😱12🤬9👏2🤔2

1 Sept 2026, 10:43 UTC≈2,760 views26 reactionsread 2 September 2026

❗️МАСШТАБ ЭЛЬГИ. ⚠️«Эльга» планирует построить в Якутии гидроэлектростанцию мощностью около 350 МВт для электрификации Тихоокеанской железной дороги (ТЖД), сообщил в интервью РБК совладелец и гендиректор компании Александр Исаев. Проектирование ГЭС почти завершено, однако окончательное решение о строительстве пока не принято. Вероятность положительного решения в следующем году Исаев оценивает в 90%. ➡️По прогнозу И

👍13🤯6🔥4🤔2💯1

31 Aug 2026, 20:32 UTC≈2,980 views129 reactionsread 2 September 2026

❗️2% - это сильно, очень сильно. От 70 000 рублей например - это 1400 рублей. ➡️Нереально круто.

🤡82😁16👍13💯8🔥4🤯3😢2😱1

31 Aug 2026, 20:26 UTC≈48,700 views144 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

🟥Российские железные дороги" (РЖД) приняло решение об индексации заработной платы сотрудников на 2% с 1 октября 2026 года в соответствии с условиями коллективного договора, сообщили в железнодорожном холдинге.

🤡111🤬17🤯6🔥4🏆3😁2👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 92 posts we hold for @sczdt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

17 Aug 2026, 20:58 UTCAnonymous Poll442 voters

Девушки на путях необщего пользования в составе локомотивных бригад на тепловозе, это тренд , или необходимость ?

  1. Это тренд45%
  2. Это необходимость48%
  3. У меня другое мнение, напишу в комментариях10%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 92 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Vgudok
@Vgudok · 27,859
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 10 September 2026
Телеграмма РЖД
@telerzd · 68,417
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 20 August 2026
Наша колея 1520
@NashaKoleya · 50,150
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 25 August 2026
РОСПРОФЖЕЛ
@rosprofzhel_rzd · 26,922
Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 11 September 2026
Грузопоток
@gruz0potok · 36,965
Telegram ranks this channel #90 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 1 September 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🚂НЕГУДОК. PRO ЖД, РЖД, ППЖТ. СЦ Желдортранс” (@sczdt), 13,076 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sczdt.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.