Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for SEO HOW TO

Channel

SEO HOW TO

@seohowtopro

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

768subscribers

+29 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002327853901
TypeChannel
Username@seohowtopro
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/seohowtopro

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

739768753.56 August 2026 — 739 subscribers6 August 2026 — 739 subscribers12 August 2026 — 750 subscribers28 August 2026 — 756 subscribers6 September 2026 — 754 subscribers14 September 2026 — 768 subscribers6 August 202614 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 40 days, net +29. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 735–772 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Sept 2026, 18:38768+14
6 Sept 2026, 20:19754-2
28 Aug 2026, 09:32756+6
12 Aug 2026, 18:16750+11
6 Aug 2026, 16:07739no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:20739first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 24 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

94 reactions across 14 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥5356.4%
👍2122.3%
77.45%
😁33.19%
🤔33.19%
🏆22.13%
👀11.06%
👎11.06%
💯11.06%
🙏11.06%
🤯11.06%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 94 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 24 June 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 09:43 UTC269 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Решил устроить действительно большую SEO-распродажу Записи моих курсов и конференций, с доступом минимум на год. Выполнение домашек на курсах на ваше усмотрение. Если в процессе возникнут вопросы — моя поддержка в обучающей системе включена в любой пакет. В стандартный пакет входят: • Старт в SEO 2.0 (философия и база современного SEO) • Системный навык поискового продвижения 3.0 (практика и системный подход) • З

🔥21👍1

25 Jul 2026, 15:58 UTC280 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Выкладываю панельную дискуссию с GEOHOWTO Conference. Честный разговор со спикерами о том, что сейчас работает в GEO/AEO. • Как на практике измерить, приходят ли клиенты именно из ответов нейросетей • Что даёт результат быстрее — доработка сайта или работа с внешними источниками • Как бренд и офлайн-активность влияют на видимость в ответах ИИ • Какие компетенции нужны специалисту, чтобы расти в GEO • Что изменится,

👍1🔥1

21 Jul 2026, 14:23 UTC397 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Решил выложить в открытый доступ свой доклад с SEOHOWTO Conference. Рассказал, как продвигать сайты, у которых по SEO всё уже как будто сделано: • Почему даже на «идеально сделанных» сайтах остаются точки роста • Где искать трафик, когда семантика, посадочные и тексты давно проработаны • Из-за чего конкуренты растут быстрее, хотя учиться у них, казалось бы, нечему • Что делать с сайтом, который годами стоит на мест

🔥6👍3🙏1

17 Jul 2026, 13:28 UTC447 viewsread 6 August 2026
File

Хорошее агентство ищет себе мидла/джуна на удаленке. Помогаю им найти хорошего специалиста. Пишите мне, я передам на хеда.

17 Jul 2026, 08:41 UTC713 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Расскажу вам о программе Baltic Digital Days 2026. Конечно, все едут за профессиональным душевным общением. Или общением по душам среди профессионалов - называйте как хотите. Но тем не менее, программа в этом году как никогда сильная. Смотреть программу: https://balticdigitaldays.ru/program2026 Первый день - стендапы от руководителей агентств или рефлексия на тему роста, развития и выживания. Мастер-классы себя из

👍4🔥1

16 Jul 2026, 14:11 UTC277 views14 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Вот вам один из чемпионатских кейсов: https://journal.topvisor.com/ru/championship/2026-umnyy-servis-stronger-ranks-more-leads/ Что видим? Тема сложная, конкурентная, сайт довольно далеко от топа. Опускаем длинную вводную часть, переходим к проблемам. Медленная загрузка, некоторые страницы не индексируются (но не те, что имеют позиции, конечно), недоработки по схема.орг, слабые КФ. Ну, ок. Что сделали: подняли ско

🔥9👍3🏆1👀1

15 Jul 2026, 16:08 UTC275 viewsread 6 August 2026
Poll

Разобрать еще кейсы?

  1. Да. С чемпионата Топвизора.59%
  2. Да. Я дам ссылку на кейс для разбора в комментариях.6%
  3. Да. Подойдут любые кейсы с сайтов агентств и фрилансеров.40%
  4. Мне результаты посмотреть.20%

The shares total 125%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

14 Jul 2026, 17:56 UTC306 viewsread 6 August 2026

Для тех, кто планировал зайти на Сопровождение, цена на него вырастет, так как у него есть младший братик в виде клуба Инсайдер. Инсайдер больше подойдет тем, у кого регулярно возникают вопросы по работе с проектами. Зайти в него можно только тем, кто был у меня Сопровождении, Практикуме или последних двух Системных навыках. Если вам нужны ответы на вопросы по делу без возни с оформлением консультаций, по цене 1 кон

14 Jul 2026, 12:57 UTC322 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Гео-шмео. А с чем работает обычный сеошник. Я вот оцениваю кейсы с чемпионата Топвизора и что имею вам сказать. Интересной работы у сеошников мало. Вот пример. По пунктам Сначала провели анализ текущего состояния раздела: оценили структуру, индексацию и видимость страниц, собрали семантику по регионам. На основе частотности и позиций рассчитали потенциал трафика и спрогнозировали ожидаемое количество заявок с учето

🔥3😁3💯1🤔1

9 Jul 2026, 12:59 UTC334 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Почему у вас не растет трафик с поиска. Причина номер 1. Ошибка в стратегии по семантике и онпейдж. - перекос в сторону сбора ключей. Собрали много, а как внедрять - непонятно, механизм только через тексты. А это либо долго, либо некачественно. Как итог, прирост есть, но на общем трафике на сайт почти незаметно. Решение: разработка методов автоматизации внедрения без ущерба качеству. Это может быть модуль для пер

🔥16

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @seohowtopro. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

15 Jul 2026, 16:08 UTCAnonymous Poll70 voters

Разобрать еще кейсы?

  1. Да. С чемпионата Топвизора.59%
  2. Да. Я дам ссылку на кейс для разбора в комментариях.6%
  3. Да. Подойдут любые кейсы с сайтов агентств и фрилансеров.40%
  4. Мне результаты посмотреть.20%

The shares total 125%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 24 June 2026 to 31 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“SEO HOW TO” (@seohowtopro), 768 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/seohowtopro.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.