International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
26 measurements spanning 91 days, net -15. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,857–5,950 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
5 Nov 2026, 10:29
5,924
-9
2 Nov 2026, 15:16
5,933
+10
30 Oct 2026, 06:11
5,923
-1
27 Oct 2026, 11:25
5,924
-7
24 Oct 2026, 07:44
5,931
-5
21 Oct 2026, 00:05
5,936
+6
18 Oct 2026, 02:28
5,930
+29
15 Oct 2026, 09:28
5,901
+33
12 Oct 2026, 14:48
5,868
-8
5 Oct 2026, 14:41
5,876
-8
27 Sept 2026, 14:55
5,884
+3
17 Sept 2026, 21:38
5,881
-13
13 Sept 2026, 13:01
5,894
+2
9 Sept 2026, 17:56
5,892
-13
4 Sept 2026, 06:19
5,905
-8
31 Aug 2026, 11:24
5,913
-1
28 Aug 2026, 02:05
5,914
-14
25 Aug 2026, 00:45
5,928
-2
21 Aug 2026, 10:45
5,930
+1
18 Aug 2026, 17:33
5,929
first reading
Engagement
54 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
29.4%
avg views ÷ 5,924 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,740
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.12%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 54 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 17 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held
54 (27 July 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Views total
34,791
Reactions total
1,246
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
5 Nov 2026, 01:23 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 05s
Average length
33s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
4,075 reactions across 43 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
2,593
63.6%
⚡
856
21.0%
👏
252
6.18%
😢
241
5.91%
🤔
133
3.26%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 48 of the 54 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,533 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 54 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 6 of 20 posts held from the last 30 days (30.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
ВЫБОРЫ В США
Прошедшие выборы в США буду анализировать более подробно на днях. Но одно очевидно - победа демократов в США, которые теперь будут контролировать Палату представителей и Сенат Конгресса США означает укрепление позиций БРИТАНСКОГО ЧУЖОГО в глобальной игре против АМЕРИКАНСКОГО ХИЩНИКА.
Для Русского мира прошедшие выборы в США означают скорое обострение Третьей мировой войны. Американский и британский ист…
ДЕНЬ НАРОДНОГО ЕДИНСТВА
4 ноября в России отмечается День народного единства, приуроченный к освобождению Москвы от польских интервентов в 1612 году русским ополчением князя Пожарского и нижегородского старосты Минина. При этом дата "праздника" не соответствует исторической действительности - Китай-город был взят русскими войсками 1 ноября 1612 года по новому стилю (22 октября по старому), а польский гарнизон в Крем…
Ни 4 ноября, ни 7 ноября не могут соответствовать высокой планке общенационального праздника. Потому что являются порождением русской Смуты начала XVII и XX веков, тяжёлыми и кровавыми этапами глубочайшего цивилизационного кризиса. Открыв для Русского мира романовскую (1613-1917) и советскую (1917-1991) эпохи, оба праздника оказались дискредитированы национальным предательством февраля 1917 и декабря 1991 года.
Наст…
Надо признать, что врагам Русского мира за прошедшие годы удалось добиться огромных успехов в плане реализации указанного проекта.
Турция, благодаря поддержке США, Великобритании и военного сотрудничества с Украиной, превратилась в достаточно развитое в военном и экономическом отношении государство. Былая ссора с США, вылившаяся в попытку свержения Эрдогана в 2016 году, уже забыта. Прошедший в 2026 году саммит НАТО …
Тем самым Средняя Азия подтвердила свой вассалитет США и верность проекту «Великий Туран». А заодно вдребезги разбила путинские фантазии про «многополярный мир», показав, что мир остаётся однополярным, у него есть лидер в лице США и стоящих за их спиной американских, британских и европейских элит.
На Востоке всегда презирали слабость и уважали силу.
И в этом плане в глазах глав государств участников проекта «Велики…
Работает здесь и шкурный экономический фактор. Получив пинка от Европы и Китая, российская либеральная «элита» начала впихивать Русскую цивилизацию и её коренные народы в тюркский проект «Великий Туран», чтобы через него получить доступ на глобальный рынок для продажи русского сырья.
Именно поэтому, пока нам рассказывали о борьбе с международным исламским терроризмом в Чечне и Сирии, в эти же годы в Россию завезли м…
Но тем самым российские либералы, теша себя глупыми надеждами, что контролируют ситуацию через спецслужбы и личные договорняки с лидерами национальных диаспор, на деле роют могилу не только Русскому миру и России, но и самим себе. Ситуация с ваххабитским подпольем в России, ордами мигрантов, этническим бандитизмом диаспор и сепаратизмом региональных элит давно уже прошла точку невозврата и неизбежно обернётся большой…
"ВЕЛИКИЙ ТУРАН" ПРОТИВ РУССКОГО МИРА
Незадолго до начала Третьей мировой войны, а именно осенью 2021 года, лидер турецких националистов Девлет Бахчели подарил президенту Турции Реджепу Тайипу Эрдогану карту «Тюркского мира», в который оказалась включена огромная часть русской территории. Фотография, на которой Бахчели вручает карту Эрдогану, вызвала тогда широкий резонанс во всём мире.
Совершенно ясно, что последую…
ФЛЮГЕР
«Не позволяйте неонацистам и бандеровцам использовать ваших детей, ваших жен и стариков в качестве живого щита. Берите власть в свои руки. Похоже, нам с вами будет легче договориться, чем с этой шайкой наркоманов и неонацистов, которая засела в Киеве и взяла в заложники весь украинский народ».
Именно с этими словами президент России Путин обратился к украинским фашистам из ВСУ 25 февраля 2022 года на заседан…
При этом враг понимает, что ему не избежать ответного ядерного удара. Однако НАТО рассчитывает, что после обезоруживающего массированного удара по сокращённой договором СНВ-3 ядерной триаде России, ответный русский ядерный удар будет слабым. Да, на время он серьёзно подорвёт глобальную экономику и систему мирового управления. Но не уничтожит её полностью и даст Западу вожделенную победу в ядерном противостоянии.
Но …
👍87⚡16😢15🤔5
Showing the 12 most recent of 54 posts we hold for @sergeyrusov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
О 4 ноября мы будем говорить завтра. А пока оцените Ваше отношение к празднику по пятибалльной шкале - от полного одобрения до резкого неприятия
59%
45%
318%
211%
158%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 54 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 4 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Отраковский Иван Александрович @iotrakovskiy · 58,912 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 22 August 2026
Товарищ Артём @t_artm · 19,858 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 29 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Сергей Русов” (@sergeyrusov), 5,924 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sergeyrusov.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.