Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
60 measurements spanning 92 days, net +642. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 18,950–20,086 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 60
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Nov 2026, 10:50
19,856
-2
5 Nov 2026, 12:06
19,858
-17
4 Nov 2026, 12:01
19,875
-9
3 Nov 2026, 09:31
19,884
+2
2 Nov 2026, 08:35
19,882
-7
1 Nov 2026, 06:54
19,889
+14
31 Oct 2026, 10:11
19,875
-12
30 Oct 2026, 06:46
19,887
-7
29 Oct 2026, 03:29
19,894
-3
28 Oct 2026, 00:48
19,897
-18
26 Oct 2026, 23:09
19,915
-4
25 Oct 2026, 22:08
19,919
-11
24 Oct 2026, 19:45
19,930
+1
23 Oct 2026, 19:37
19,929
+2
22 Oct 2026, 23:04
19,927
-4
22 Oct 2026, 00:06
19,931
-9
20 Oct 2026, 16:38
19,940
-2
19 Oct 2026, 15:37
19,942
+28
18 Oct 2026, 14:18
19,914
-3
17 Oct 2026, 13:14
19,917
first reading
Engagement
301 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 64 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
15.6%
avg views ÷ 19,856 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,100
57 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.72%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
58
of 301 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held
301 (3 August 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total
176,820
Reactions total
8,339
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Nov 2026, 03:14 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2h 35m
Average length
1m 42s
Measured directly from 92 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
53,849 reactions across 291 posts, in 45 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
💯
22,337
41.5%
👍
8,263
15.3%
🤣
4,092
7.60%
🤔
2,551
4.74%
❤
2,537
4.71%
😁
2,383
4.43%
🤬
2,354
4.37%
👏
1,487
2.76%
👎
1,464
2.72%
🔥
1,328
2.47%
😡
1,255
2.33%
🙈
716
1.33%
🙏
474
0.88%
🤝
357
0.663%
🤪
356
0.661%
🤯
288
0.535%
😢
251
0.466%
❤🔥
205
0.381%
😭
200
0.371%
😱
158
0.293%
25 further kinds
793
1.47%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 300 of the 301 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 55,752 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 301 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 47 of 58 posts held from the last 30 days (81.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Вы, смерды, сами виноваты в своих бедах. Вообще охренели, мясо им подавай.
В рамках ростовщической финансовой системы, мясо должны есть только избранные, а вам - углеводы.
Дарагие россияне могут питаться крупой и фасолью, если не могут позволить себе мясо, — Финансовый (ростовщический) университет при Правительстве РФ.
По словам экономиста Ольги Климовой, бедные семьи могут заменить мясо на картофель, фасоль, горо…
Из диалога в комментариях:
Арт:
Русские убивают русских ...
Товарищ Артём:
Украинствующие русские убивают нормальных русских, а это значит, что украинство должно быть уничтожено, тогда не будет украинствующих русских и никто никого убивать не будет.
Подписаться
____
Поддержать канал:
4276380118421077 Сбер
Товарищ Артём pinned «Друзья! Огромная благодарность 5% активных подписчиков моего канала за участие в попытке выхода нашего сообщества из онлайна в оффлайн. Отдельная благодарность Антону Валерьевичу, который не единожды вложил эквивалент своего труда, выраженный в крупных суммах.…»
Посмотрел свежее интервью террористки и экстремистки Монтян иноагенту Паше Иванову.
Я не согласен с Монтян по широкому кругу вопросов, но смотреть ее интересно, потому что это человек, мыслящий самостоятельно. Это не смрад заказушного информационного поля, это глоток свежих мыслей, своих, собственных мыслей, а не холуйское эпистолярное преобразование спущенных сверху смыслов. Поэтому Монтян смотрят и читают, а предс…
Из киевских чатов парочку сообщений вам в ленту:
Сегодня 2 раза включали свет на один час. Пиздец, все поразбивали, отопления нет, в квартире 12 градусов. Газ пока есть, Кличко (пидор), говорит, уезжайте из Киева, куда хотите. А куда и за что людям уезжать - к нему домой?
А у нас завтра 17 часов без света и отопление не запустили...В квартире 16 градусов при 90" влажности...полнейшая жопа.
А ведь зима еще не наст…
Вот вам первое видео, в котором бандеровцы награждают врача с фамилией Молодая.
А на втором видео те же самые бандеровцы требуют доказательств от Молодой о том, что она врач.
Как мы видим, юриспруденция бандеровского режима насилует здравый смысл еще более извращенно, чем Ворошиловский суд Донецка вынося приговор Монтян с реальным сроком за призыв мочить (банить) ботву в соцсетях.
Вывод. КАПИТАЛизм всегда будет на…
Друзья! Огромная благодарность 5% активных подписчиков моего канала за участие в попытке выхода нашего сообщества из онлайна в оффлайн. Отдельная благодарность Антону Валерьевичу, который не единожды вложил эквивалент своего труда, выраженный в крупных суммах. Большая благодарность тем, кто также поучаствовал не одной тысячей рублей. Это ваша оценка моего труда. Спасибо!
Собранной на сегодняшний день суммы в 197 тыс…
Когда освободили Дебальцево, я был там на следующий день. Мы открыли пункт выдачи гуманитарной помощи людям. Имел возможность пообщаться с товарищами, находившимися под бандеровской оккупацией. Они были очень напуганы, но мне удалось их разговорить. Даже на камеру (видео выкладывать не буду чтобы не навредить, иди знай как сложилась судьба этих людей).
Так вот. Все они утверждали, что бандеровцы перед наступлением в…
В Киеве нет электричества. В следующем посте будет график включения. И то, даже его не соблюдают.
Вопрос: вот эта укра́инствующая дурёха, которая снимает это видео и ломает свой мозг (который мыслит на родном русском языке) кулишовкой, никогда не задумывалась над тем, что изнасилование самой себя кулишовкой и отсутствие электричества в Киеве - это звенья одной цепи?
Сначала ты скачешь на майдане, отказавшись от сво…
Надежда только на иранских братьев.
Иран готов атаковать т.н. украйну в случае новой атаки со стороны США.
Иранский государственный телеканал IRINN назвал Киев, Львов и Одессу среди потенциальных целей в Европе на случай военного удара США по Ирану.
Очень надеюсь, что Иран будет бить не по трансформаторным будкам, а по распредустройствам, идущим от атомных станций, а также по центрам принятия решений, по мостам, п…
Что не так с калориями?
(продолжение)
Сайт с книгой и ознакомительным фрагментом теперь в поиске Яндекса! Ищите по слову «карнивор». Или переходите по ссылке.
📙 Купить книгу
https://sobremedicine.ru
Около медицины
Канал:
Карнивор. Те, кто смог
📱YouTube
📱 ВК
❤🔥8❤6👎4🤔4👍3
Showing the 12 most recent of 301 posts we hold for @t_artm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@t_artm edited 9 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
5 November 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 2 posts on @t_artm as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
8 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
1 September 2026
Median time before seen missing
16 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Кто начнет ликвидировать главрей бандеровской хунты?
Правящий в РФ слой42%
Ким Чен Ын8%
Иранцы10%
Западные хозяева секты укра́инствующих19%
Никто не будет25%
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Считаете ли вы эффективной стратегией работы в информационном поле постоянно обгавкивать действующую власть?
Да. Нужно постоянно изобличать этих негодяев, тогда народ всё поймет, увидит и начнет действовать66%
Нет. Такая стратегия наоборот работает на власть, ибо маргинализует любую оппозиционную деятельность34%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 301 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 5 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 39 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Полковник Квачков и соратники @KvachkovV · 35,299#1
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 29 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Полковник Квачков и соратники @KvachkovV · 35,299 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 2 September 2026
Аврора @aurora_network · 30,167 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 7 September 2026
Телеканал «Сталинград» @TELEKANALSTALINGRAD · 84,127 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 18 August 2026
СОЛДАТСКАЯ ПРАВДА @soldat_prav · 56,213 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 23 August 2026
Перехват управления @logikadysha · 36,931 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 1 September 2026
Владимир Лепехин | Канал @vladimirlepehin · 46,013 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 27 August 2026
Марина Масленникова @mamaslennikova · 30,054 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 8 September 2026
ДОКТОР ДЕНИС ИВАНОВ @doctor_denisivanov · 25,915 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 16 September 2026
Отраковский Иван Александрович @iotrakovskiy · 58,894 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 22 August 2026
Спец @spetstv · 21,562 Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 23 September 2026
Будьте здоровы! А.Редько @budte_zdorovi_vse · 33,568 Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 4 September 2026
Мирослава Регинская (Свободу Стрелкову!) @i_strelkov_2023 · 47,781 Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 26 August 2026
Даниил (Даниэль) Сачков, создатель Бастиона @danielsatchkov · 35,726 Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 2 September 2026
АНТИУТОПИЯ @utopiyaproject · 30,561 Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 6 September 2026
ЕНГАЛЫЧЕВА Екатерина @deputatEkaterina · 44,196 Telegram ranks this channel #89 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 17 September 2026
This channel appears in 15 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Товарищ Артём” (@t_artm), 19,856 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/t_artm.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.