Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Товарищ Артём

Channel

Товарищ Артём

@t_artm

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

19,119subscribers

-95 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001860715917
TypeChannel
Username@t_artm
Created4 February 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/t_artm

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

19,08119,21419,147.56 August 2026 — 19,214 subscribers6 August 2026 — 19,214 subscribers6 August 2026 — 19,213 subscribers7 August 2026 — 19,208 subscribers8 August 2026 — 19,195 subscribers9 August 2026 — 19,181 subscribers10 August 2026 — 19,164 subscribers12 August 2026 — 19,161 subscribers13 August 2026 — 19,139 subscribers14 August 2026 — 19,125 subscribers16 August 2026 — 19,123 subscribers17 August 2026 — 19,127 subscribers18 August 2026 — 19,112 subscribers20 August 2026 — 19,113 subscribers21 August 2026 — 19,103 subscribers22 August 2026 — 19,117 subscribers24 August 2026 — 19,109 subscribers25 August 2026 — 19,097 subscribers26 August 2026 — 19,095 subscribers27 August 2026 — 19,096 subscribers28 August 2026 — 19,086 subscribers29 August 2026 — 19,098 subscribers30 August 2026 — 19,095 subscribers31 August 2026 — 19,086 subscribers1 September 2026 — 19,081 subscribers3 September 2026 — 19,091 subscribers5 September 2026 — 19,095 subscribers8 September 2026 — 19,102 subscribers11 September 2026 — 19,111 subscribers13 September 2026 — 19,121 subscribers14 September 2026 — 19,124 subscribers16 September 2026 — 19,121 subscribers19 September 2026 — 19,119 subscribers19,1196 August 202619 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 44 days, net -95. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19,061–19,234 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 03:4119,119-2
16 Sept 2026, 21:4019,121-3
14 Sept 2026, 22:0019,124+3
13 Sept 2026, 05:0119,121+10
11 Sept 2026, 09:1919,111+9
8 Sept 2026, 12:5519,102+7
5 Sept 2026, 10:0119,095+4
3 Sept 2026, 16:1919,091+10
1 Sept 2026, 08:0719,081-5
31 Aug 2026, 04:3319,086-9
30 Aug 2026, 05:1419,095-3
29 Aug 2026, 05:2619,098+12
28 Aug 2026, 04:2419,086-10
27 Aug 2026, 03:0619,096+1
26 Aug 2026, 05:5219,095-2
25 Aug 2026, 04:3419,097-12
24 Aug 2026, 01:1619,109-8
22 Aug 2026, 07:2719,117+14
21 Aug 2026, 01:0419,103-10
20 Aug 2026, 00:1819,113first reading

Engagement

243 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 57 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
20.9%
avg views ÷ 19,119 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,990
86 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.20%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
86
of 243 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held243 (3 August 20262 September 2026)
Views total343,431
Reactions total17,872
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 01:27 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1h 52m
Average length
1m 31s

Measured directly from 74 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

45,510 reactions across 234 posts, in 44 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💯19,39942.6%
👍5,57112.2%
🤣3,6037.92%
🤔2,3085.07%
2,1904.81%
🤬2,1584.74%
😁2,1284.68%
👏1,3062.87%
👎1,2242.69%
😡1,2062.65%
🔥1,0452.30%
🙈6951.53%
🙏4440.976%
🤯2780.611%
🤝2610.574%
🤪2580.567%
😢2320.51%
😭1870.411%
❤‍🔥1680.369%
😱1220.268%
24 further kinds7271.60%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 243 of the 243 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 47,413 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 243 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 22:09 UTC647 views46 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Вот я против участия в шоу "Выборы", а например Задерей или Лепехин за. И? У них просто другое мнение по этому вопросу. Неужели после этого я должен считать их врагами? Опомнитесь уже! Хватит этих вечных срачей, которые не несут ничего кроме разжижения ваших мозгов! Подписаться ____ Поддержать канал: 4276380118421077 Сбер

💯345👎4👍3

2 Sept 2026, 22:05 UTC654 views22 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Опять русские и советские горячие патриоты разделились на два лагеря и грызут друг друга. Один лагерь против участия в шоу "Выборы", второй за. Товарищи, вам не надоело пожирать друг друга? Подписаться ____ Поддержать канал: 4276380118421077 Сбер

🤝12👎3👏3👍2🤔1😡1

2 Sept 2026, 20:51 UTC≈1,540 views92 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Уверен, что Бондаренко запустили в эфир с одной единственной целью - показать внешним игрокам какая в РФ демократия, как на федеральных каналах чехвостят власть и в хвост и в гриву, но видите, всё равно у партии Путина 80+%, поэтому мы мегалегитимны. Никаких иных задач, с моей точки зрения, пламенные спичи Николая не решают. Все же прекрасно понимают, что результаты шоу "Выборы" в определенных кабинетах уже давно из

💯66👎9🤔7😢62👍1😡1

2 Sept 2026, 20:18 UTC≈1,480 views161 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Стоит признать, что Бондаренко великолепный оратор. Ему дали доступ на федеральный канал три раза по 5 минут и он чётко, пусть и в эмоциональном ключе (а по-другому за это время и невозможно) до секунды изложил суть всех нынешних проблем РФ: ростовщическо-налоговый ад, в котором мы живем и в котором невозможно размножаться даже в теории. Приведёт ли выступление Бондаренко к каким-то практическим результатам? Нет, не

💯113👍30👏75🤣3👌1🤔1🤝1

2 Sept 2026, 09:17 UTC≈3,470 views164 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Всегда, товарищи, нужно признавать свои ошибки. Я признаю, что был не прав. На этот раз по супостату не стали применять стратегическое эпистолярное оружие как я предполагал, ограничились лиши тактическим. "Мы со всеми работаем в теснейшей координации. Росавиация находится, по сути, в режиме постоянного оперативного диалога со всеми специальными службами и с Министерством обороны, конечно, тоже. <...> На все угрозы м

😡92🤣38💯1610🤔5🤗1🤷‍♂1😭1

2 Sept 2026, 08:44 UTC≈4,300 views339 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Слушая вчерашние заявления Путина, я лишний раз понял, почему мой дед фронтовик был убеждённым сталинистом и почему наши предки гибли с именем Сталина на устах. Они воевали, клали свои жизни на алтарь Победы, но знали, что наверху нет гнили, верх за нас, верх воюет за Победу, а не за вшивый договорняк. Поэтому бойцы и шли в бой со словами "За Родину, за Сталина", в которых "за Сталина" не было поклонением перед куль

💯264😢2615🤣11👍7👎6🙈4👏3

2 Sept 2026, 08:06 UTC≈4,020 views192 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Эпистолярный удар недофюрера по авиасообщению РФ привел к тому, что авиакомпании начали отменять рейсы. Заметьте, что эпистолярные удары Дмитрия Анатольевича и, даже страшно сказать, Владимира Владимировича, к подобным последствиям для врагов не приводят. Почему так? Подписаться ____ Поддержать канал: 4276380118421077 Сбер

💯112🤣61🤔13👏5😐1

2 Sept 2026, 05:52 UTC≈4,410 views238 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Будущий ответ РФ на то, когда заявка на терроризм будет принята. Ничего не ново под Луной. Подписаться ____ Поддержать канал: 4276380118421077 Сбер

😁170💯43👍175🤨3

2 Sept 2026, 05:41 UTC≈4,120 views184 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Ответы РФ давно и всем известны: убийственные, всё испепеляющие на своем пути эпистолярные удары Дмитрия Анатольевича Медведева. Против этого сверхоружия, аналогов которому в мире точно нет, Запад до сих пор ничего не противопоставил. Выносят супостата госдеды, что называется, в одну калитку. Подписаться ____ Поддержать канал: 4276380118421077 Сбер

💯91🤣6711🤷‍♂8👏5🤬1🤯1

2 Sept 2026, 05:37 UTC≈4,070 views319 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Вот оно чё, Михалыч. Оказывается вторжение в Курскую область, ежедневное убийство граждан РФ дронами, нанесение ударов в НПЗ и Вайлдберриз - это не терроризм, а лишь только заявка на терроризм. После этих слов гения от геополитики, начал переживать за Бастрыкина и весь Следственный комитет. С какого хрена они заводят дела на замечательных бандеровцев после каждого обстрела, если они не террористы, а только делают за

😡150💯59🤬47🙈28🤣21👍63👎2

2 Sept 2026, 05:21 UTC≈4,260 views412 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Договорофилия у 74-летнего госдеда дошла до терминальной стадии. Нам нужны какие-то люди для решения вопросов, ответил величайший геополитик галактики на вопрос о гарантиях безопасности вождям бандеровской хунты и о том, почему РФ не наносит удары по руководству т.н. украйны. Мы не бьём по политическому руководству, потому что нам же нужен хоть кто-то, с кем потом договариваться. Т.е. РФ кладет кучу жизней на поля

🤬165💯145🤣62😱9🙈9🤨7👏5👎4

1 Sept 2026, 19:13 UTC≈4,110 views235 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Как и ожидалось, по крайней мере мною, бандеровцы пока в эпистолярном жанре начали наносить удары по авиасообщению Российской Федерации. Уверен, что переход от эпистолярных ударов к практическим произойдет очень быстро. Это не медведевские красные линии, постоянно переходящие в коричневые. В принципе недофюрер уже переплюнул всех террористов вместе взятых за всю историю планеты. Но он жив, здоров и безопасности его

💯186🤬345🤣5😭3👎1👏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 243 posts we hold for @t_artm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@t_artm edited 8 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
3 September 2026

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

24 Aug 2026, 06:07 UTCAnonymous Poll2,390 voters approx.

Как Вы думаете, вышепредставленное видео с женщиной, требующей в первую очередь обеспечить бензином Москву, реально?

  1. Нет, это провокация врагов для разделения нашего общества29%
  2. Да, таких уродов полно, к бабке не ходи.72%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

19 Aug 2026, 21:50 UTCAnonymous Poll2,380 voters approx.

Кто начнет ликвидировать главрей бандеровской хунты?

  1. Правящий в РФ слой42%
  2. Ким Чен Ын8%
  3. Иранцы10%
  4. Западные хозяева секты укра́инствующих19%
  5. Никто не будет25%

The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

7 Aug 2026, 14:41 UTCAnonymous Poll617 voters

Считаете ли вы эффективной стратегией работы в информационном поле постоянно обгавкивать действующую власть?

  1. Да. Нужно постоянно изобличать этих негодяев, тогда народ всё поймет, увидит и начнет действовать66%
  2. Нет. Такая стратегия наоборот работает на власть, ибо маргинализует любую оппозиционную деятельность34%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 243 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 32 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Полковник Квачков и соратники
@KvachkovV · 35,515
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 2 September 2026
Аврора
@aurora_network · 30,437
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 7 September 2026
Телеканал «Сталинград»
@TELEKANALSTALINGRAD · 84,551
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 18 August 2026
СОЛДАТСКАЯ ПРАВДА
@soldat_prav · 56,712
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 23 August 2026
Перехват управления
@logikadysha · 37,230
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 1 September 2026
Владимир Лепехин | Канал
@vladimirlepehin · 46,124
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 27 August 2026
Марина Масленникова
@mamaslennikova · 29,860
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 8 September 2026
ДОКТОР ДЕНИС ИВАНОВ
@doctor_denisivanov · 24,523
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 16 September 2026
Отраковский Иван Александрович
@iotrakovskiy · 59,156
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 22 August 2026
Будьте здоровы! А.Редько
@budte_zdorovi_vse · 33,161
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 4 September 2026
Мирослава Регинская (Свободу Стрелкову!)
@i_strelkov_2023 · 48,034
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 26 August 2026
Даниил (Даниэль) Сачков, создатель Бастиона
@danielsatchkov · 35,753
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 2 September 2026
АНТИУТОПИЯ
@utopiyaproject · 30,864
Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 6 September 2026
ЕНГАЛЫЧЕВА Екатерина
@deputatEkaterina · 44,347
Telegram ranks this channel #89 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 17 September 2026

This channel appears in 14 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Товарищ Артём” (@t_artm), 19,119 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/t_artm.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.