Второй канал Татьяны Монтян, без купюр и соблюдения этикета.
Ещё каналы:
@montyan2 — аналитика и новости
@montyanphotos — моя фотолента
Реклама → @w_venison
Доступ к каментам / оплата подписки - https://paywall.pw/vnopyz4jbaxz
Created
16 January 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 80% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
35 measurements spanning 43 days, net +81. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 45,872–46,116 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 03:40
46,019
+13
15 Sept 2026, 21:41
46,006
-11
14 Sept 2026, 06:55
46,017
-3
12 Sept 2026, 16:59
46,020
-21
10 Sept 2026, 14:57
46,041
-2
7 Sept 2026, 12:39
46,043
-20
4 Sept 2026, 14:37
46,063
-18
2 Sept 2026, 23:36
46,081
-7
1 Sept 2026, 22:15
46,088
+13
1 Sept 2026, 00:38
46,075
+10
30 Aug 2026, 23:29
46,065
-16
29 Aug 2026, 23:27
46,081
+31
28 Aug 2026, 19:57
46,050
+8
27 Aug 2026, 18:57
46,042
+44
26 Aug 2026, 19:34
45,998
+20
25 Aug 2026, 16:22
45,978
+14
24 Aug 2026, 15:37
45,964
-18
23 Aug 2026, 00:44
45,982
+1
21 Aug 2026, 16:28
45,981
-9
20 Aug 2026, 17:04
45,990
first reading
Engagement
374 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 101 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
29.4%
avg views ÷ 46,019 subscribers
Avg views / post
13,500
226 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.86%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
226
of 374 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 September 2026
Posts held
374 (3 August 2026 – 25 September 2026)
Views total
3,060,060
Reactions total
148,859
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
25 Sept 2026, 18:11 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈4,540
Videos
≈2,450
Links
≈5,840
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1h 48m
Average length
1m 26s
Measured directly from 76 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
239,938 reactions across 361 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
51,260
21.4%
💯
48,988
20.4%
❤
48,198
20.1%
🤬
25,088
10.5%
🔥
17,807
7.42%
😢
16,492
6.87%
😁
15,441
6.44%
🤣
8,969
3.74%
🤮
4,695
1.96%
💩
1,896
0.79%
🥰
467
0.195%
🙈
254
0.106%
🫡
245
0.102%
👎
138
0.058%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 374 of the 374 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 246,653 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 374 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 25 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
4,766
across the posts below
Posts paid on
358
of 374 we hold a reading for · 96%
Most on one post
902
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @montian_official2. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 374 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 25 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Я восемь лет трудясь редактором в политических ток-шоу всё силился понять до конца: зачем нам на российском телевидении не только транслировали все возможные цитаты русофобов мира, а также на какого Хуана нам нужны были привозные укропы из числа евромайдаунов вроде Славы Ковтуна, Трухана, Гайдука и прочих? Причем на нихеровые гонорары минимум по 20.000 за эфир, с билетами и проживанием.
А потом вдруг в интернете как…
Прекрасный Донецк и его злачные места🔥
Пока все заняты моей мочёной охранотой, местная гопота и криминал, сросшийся с искалечившими меня деятелями и крышуемый ими — чувствует себя великолепно!💪
https://t.me/t_artm/8964
«Лучший аргумент против демократии — пятиминутная беседа со средним избирателем» (с)🙈
Это фейк, приписываемый Черчиллю, но тем не менее😎
Скажу как институционалист: непосредственная (прямая) демократия работает только в небольших коллективах, где все друг друга знают.
Но даже этого мало — люди должны интересоваться предметом/объектом голосования, то есть быть подготовленными к принятию решений.
Вы таки интересует…
Вообще не понимаю, зачем огород городить⚖️
Присяжные там какие-то, заседатели народные… да и вообще сами судьи, у которых находят непонятно откуда появившиеся миллиарды🙈
Все равно суды принимают абсолютно безумные решения понятно по чьему заказу — как по моей «лотерее», например, и еще по звиздиллиарду дел😎
Обвинили органы — значит, виновен! Оправдательных приговоров все равно ведь фактически нет — какой же смысл …
Ну все, попал Тимати!🍿🍿🍿
Наверное, придется продать Бугатти, чтобы расплатиться за посылание нахуй товарища общественника!😭
Болею за обе стороны!⚖️
СДД!🔥
====
ПОДПИСЫВАЙТЕСЬ НА МОЙ "БАСТИОН" — на всякий случай!👆
#МОНТЯН! Без купюр
Оплата подписки для доступа к каментам - https://paywall.pw/vnopyz4jbaxz
Охранота🤪🔥
Жрет друг друга и не давится😀
Приятного аппетита, чо😎
ЗЫ. Фигурантка видосика удалила на своем блевотнике все свои высеры на Карнаухова — зассала штоле?🤔
====
ПОДПИСЫВАЙТЕСЬ НА МОЙ "БАСТИОН" — на всякий случай!👆
#МОНТЯН! Без купюр
Оплата подписки для доступа к каментам - https://paywall.pw/vnopyz4jbaxz
Эпическая заруба "серийное стукачидло VS пафосный сибарит"🤮💩
Вчера все паблики взахлёб писали, что некто рэпер Тимати прикупил легендарный Bugatti W16 Mistral за жалкие полмиллиарда рублей — и заплатил рекордный для России таможенный сбор в размере всего лишь 244 млн рублей.
Тачку завезли в Россию из Европы через Киргизию. На Bugatti установлены номера «777» со старым московским кодом региона «77». Это двухместны…
…А вдруг таки есть в каком-то ином измерении Страна Любви❤️
Где встречаются в конце концов все, кто когда-либо друг друга любил?🧐
…И они там наконец-то встретятся!..🙏
…Что они могли бы друг другу сказать?🤔
====
ПОДПИСЫВАЙТЕСЬ НА МОЙ "БАСТИОН" — на всякий случай!👆
#МОНТЯН! Без купюр
Оплата подписки для доступа к каментам - https://paywall.pw/vnopyz4jbaxz
Адвокат Калугин: дело Монтян, нацболы и проблема 500💪
====
ПОДПИСЫВАЙТЕСЬ НА МОЙ "БАСТИОН" — на всякий случай!👆
#МОНТЯН! Без купюр
Оплата подписки для доступа к каментам - https://paywall.pw/vnopyz4jbaxz
Джиган-лимон, мальчишка симатичный (с)😎
Ну вот всё и стало на свои места👆
Оксана Самойлова пытается ограничить Джигана в родительских правах. Соответствующее исковое заявление уже поступило в Савёловский районный суд Москвы. Также Самойлова требует, чтобы дети постоянно проживали с ней.
После мощнейшей выходки папашки, вероятнее всего находившегося под действием модификаторов сознания — врачи диагностировали у дет…
😁348💯173❤33👍24🔥23
Showing the 12 most recent of 374 posts we hold for @montian_official2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@montian_official2 edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
7 September 2026
Most recent edit
13 September 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 25 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
2
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
1
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@montian_official2 named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@rgrunews named in 2 posts, 12 September 2026 – 14 September 2026 · confirmed gone 13 September 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@rian_ru named in 2 posts, 11 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 27 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Фоточки #МОНТЯН! @montyanphotos · 31,033 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 6 September 2026
#МОНТЯН! @montyan2 · 301,448 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 10 August 2026
kolobok1973 @kolobok1973 · 21,636 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 23 September 2026
Borisenko Dmitriy @borisenkoD · 111,854 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 14 August 2026
Павел Иванов | Аудио статьи @a_articles · 110,713 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 14 August 2026
Лев Вершинин @putnik1lv · 42,301 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 29 August 2026
Мирослава Регинская (Свободу Стрелкову!) @i_strelkov_2023 · 48,034 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 26 August 2026
Лина Булатникова🤍 Помощь фронту💙Дроны "Мурз"❤️Стримы @reihatori · 24,417 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 15 September 2026
Dirty Harry | Игорь Гомольский @harry_homolsky · 26,327 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 13 September 2026
Паньчак Володимир @panchakvolodymyr · 42,230 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 9 September 2026
ПриZрак Новороссии @ghost_of_novorossia · 141,584 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 13 August 2026
Евгений Спицын @SpicynEY · 28,905 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 9 September 2026
Спец @spetstv · 21,609 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 23 September 2026
Абзац. Видео @Absatzvideo · 22,987 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 19 September 2026
Таро Юлия Петрова Official @taroyuliapetrova · 29,088 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 9 September 2026
КОЛОБОК ИЗ ОДЕССЫ @kolobok_odesa · 101,250 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 23 August 2026
СОЛДАТСКАЯ ПРАВДА @soldat_prav · 56,712 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 23 August 2026
Равреба пишет @Ravreba · 21,920 Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 22 September 2026
Перехват управления @logikadysha · 37,230 Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 1 September 2026
Кухня наизнанку @min2ru · 536,549 Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 11 August 2026
Аврора @aurora_network · 30,405 Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 7 September 2026
Синяя Z Борода @beard_tim · 111,638 Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 14 August 2026
WALK&TALK @walkandtalke · 57,747 Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 23 August 2026
This channel appears in 23 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“#МОНТЯН! Без купюр” (@montian_official2), 46,019 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/montian_official2.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.