Channel
@seryicard
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
5,852subscribers
-116 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001173994925 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @seryicard |
| Created | 16 August 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/seryicard |
Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Sept 2026, 21:37 | 5,852 | -16 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 06:36 | 5,868 | +6 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 19:16 | 5,862 | -14 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 02:34 | 5,876 | -8 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 22:45 | 5,884 | -2 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 23:23 | 5,886 | -15 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 18:54 | 5,901 | -15 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 10:03 | 5,916 | -23 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 16:26 | 5,939 | -8 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 21:18 | 5,947 | -11 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 22:44 | 5,958 | -6 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 06:11 | 5,964 | -6 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 13:35 | 5,970 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:35 | 5,968 | first reading |
29 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 29 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
706 reactions across 23 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 329 | 46.6% | |
| ❤ | 174 | 24.6% | |
| 🔥 | 115 | 16.3% | |
| 👎 | 34 | 4.82% | |
| 😁 | 19 | 2.69% | |
| 🤮 | 14 | 1.98% | |
| 🤣 | 11 | 1.56% | |
| 🍾 | 4 | 0.567% | |
| 🤔 | 3 | 0.425% | |
| 🗿 | 2 | 0.283% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 0.142% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 29 of the 29 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 933 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
«Қайрат» неге «Левскиден» өте алмады? Өйткені болгариялық чемпион күштірек боп шықты. Оның құрамының жалпы құны алматылық клубтан төрт есе қымбат. Командада 19 легионер бар, олардың кейбірінің құны 3 миллион еуроға дейін жетеді. Мұндай клубтардан өту үшін бірнеше фактордың бір жерде тоғысуы керек. Біріншісі — сәттілік. Көптеген мамандар мұны мүлде мойындамай, сәтсіздікті ойын шеберлігінің жетіспеушілігімен түсіндір…
❤7👍6🔥4🤮1
Почему "Кайрат" не прошёл "Левски"? Потому что болгарский чемпион просто сильнее. Суммарная стоимость его состава в четыре раза дороже алматинского. В команде 19 легионеров, некоторые стоят по 3 миллиона евро. Чтобы проходить такие клубы, нужно слияние воедино нескольких факторов. Первый — это везение, хотя многие специалисты напрочь отрицают его, заменяя на недостаток игрового мастерства. Сегодня в некоторых момен…
👍18😁8❤4🤣2🔥1
У "Кайрата" есть шанс пройти дальше, даже с учетом проведения игры не на родной арене, а в Туркестане. Пожелаем удачи казахстанской команде! ⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ «Қайрат» өз алаңында емес, Түркістан аренасында ойнайды. Десек те келесі кезеңге өтуге мүмкіндігі бар. Қазақстан командасына сәттілік тілейміз!
👍16🔥7❤6👎5
Сегодня президент ОЮЛ «Актюбинская Федерация Футбола» Асхат Калжанов встретился с генеральным консулом КНР в Актобе Го Юй. В ходе встречи Асхат Калжанов отметил динамично развивающиеся отношения между Казахстаном и Китаем в экономической и политической сферах, которые находятся под особым вниманием и прямым патронажем глав двух государств — Президента Республики Казахстан Касым-Жомарта Токаева и Председателя КНР Си …
👍13🤮11❤5🔥4
В Астане в рамках «Игр будущего» прошёл шоу-матч В Астане в рамках международного турнира «Игры будущего» состоялся шоу-матч в формате фиджитал. Его организовали QOFA (Карагандинская областная ассоциация футбола) и United Esports Leagues при поддержке акимата Карагандинской области. Караганда одной из первых в Казахстане начала развивать направление Phygital. В рамках проекта QOFA ALGA! в начальных классах школ рег…
❤8👎4👍2🔥1
"Астана" обыграла прямого конкурента "Окжетпес" и значительно усилила свои позиции в борьбе за бронзу. Кокшетаусцы, наоборот, ослабили свои позиции, но за четвертое место поборются точно. Вообще, было бы интересно посмотреть, если во второй раз в своей истории "Окжетпес" получит право играть в еврокубках. По крайней мере для акима области Марата Ахметжанова, акима города Ануара Кумпекеева, а также предводителя аграри…
👍12❤6🔥4😁1
Главный матч второго игрового дня 21-го тура КПЛ с турнирной точки зрения - "Астана" - "Окжетпес". Обе команды борются за третье место. Столичная команда может отсечь кокшетаусцев от бронзы и, соответственно, укрепить свои позиции. "Окжетпес" если победит, то "Астану". Парадоксальным образом "Актобе" может вновь вклиниться в борьбу за медали и уж точно не потерял шансов на четвертое, потенциально еврокубковое, место…
👍7🔥7❤5
С учётом технической победы "Алтай" набирает 19 очков и сравнивается с "Жетысу" и "Атырау", а также на 2 очка опережает "Иртыш". Правда, у оскеменцев и семиреченцев на две игры больше. Это может иметь принципиально важное значение. "Ордабасы" разгромил на выезде "Жетысу" и немного оторвался от "Кайрата". Алматинцам еще нужно выиграть свой матч. "Каспий" с "Ұлытау" сыграли вничью. Результат, который, похоже, устроил …
❤6🔥6👍4
Футбольному клубу "Кызылжар" будет присуждено техническое поражение. Дело в том, что Александр Нойок сыграл за две команды в рамках одного тура ("Атырау" и "Кызылжар"). Это нарушение. Загвоздка в том, что майская встреча между "Актобе" и "Атырау" прошла в рамках сегодняшнего 21-го тура. Если бы стороны не менялись полями, тогда был бы 10-й тур. В общем, такая правовая коллизия. ⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ «Қызылжар» футбол клуб…
❤14🔥14👍5😁3
Любой тренер должен быть готов к отставке сразу после своего назначения. На этих коротких видео один наставник прощается с "Атырау", а второй только пришёл в "Жеңіс". Не успеете глазом моргнуть (не в буквальном смысле, конечно), как все вновь поменяется. Такова тренерская доля... ⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ Кез келген бапкер қызметке тағайындалған сәттен бастап-ақ отставкаға дайын болуы керек. Бұл қысқа видеоларда бір бапкер «А…
👍9🔥4❤1😁1
"Ордабасы" вряд ли испытает проблемы в Талдықорғане. Хотя чисто по-человечески жаль команду "Жетысу" (не путать с клубом!), которой очень и очень сложно. "Каспий" постарается реабилитироваться за поражение в прошлом туре от "Иртыша". В свою очередь, для "Алтая" этот матч - один из шансов зацепиться за соломинку. ⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ Әрине, жеңіл әрі түсінікті нұсқасы: «Ордабасы» Талдықорғанда қиындық көре қоймас. Ал ад…
🔥9❤5👍2
Несмотря на крупное поражение, актюбинских футболисток можно только похвалить. Они совершили невозможное - вышли в финал отбора. Сегодня "Серветт" показал, к чему нужно стремиться ЖФК "Актобе". Надеемся, что женская команда извлечет уроки и станет сильнее. ⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ Ірі есеппен жеңілгеніне қарамастан, «Ақтөбе» футболшы қыздарын тек мақтауға болады. Олар мүмкін еместі мүмкін етіп, Чемпиондар лигасы іріктеу кезе…
👍33❤9🍾4🔥4😁1
Showing the 12 most recent of 29 posts we hold for @seryicard. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@seryicard edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Серый CARDINAL🇰🇿⚽️” (@seryicard), 5,852 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/seryicard.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.