Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
12 measurements spanning 40 days, net +86. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,653–7,834 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Sept 2026, 07:59
7,813
+5
11 Sept 2026, 19:17
7,808
+72
7 Sept 2026, 03:59
7,736
+46
2 Sept 2026, 21:36
7,690
+14
30 Aug 2026, 13:12
7,676
+2
27 Aug 2026, 09:18
7,674
-25
20 Aug 2026, 05:43
7,699
-7
17 Aug 2026, 12:17
7,706
-2
13 Aug 2026, 15:39
7,708
-5
10 Aug 2026, 21:26
7,713
-11
7 Aug 2026, 12:44
7,724
-3
6 Aug 2026, 15:51
7,727
first reading
Engagement
171 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
3.84%
avg views ÷ 7,813 subscribers
Avg views / post
300
53 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.01%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
53
of 171 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 25 of 53 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held
171 (3 August 2026 – 28 August 2026)
Views total
15,921
Reactions total
72
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
28 Aug 2026, 21:04 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1h 05m
Average length
3m 18s
Measured directly from 20 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
181 reactions across 65 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
100
55.2%
💯
31
17.1%
🏆
15
8.29%
✍
13
7.18%
🎉
13
7.18%
⚡
9
4.97%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 67 of the 171 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 181 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 171 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
17) ومن الكتب التي فيها رد على سيد قطب المورد الزلال في التنبيه على أخطاء تفسير الظلال للعلامة عبد الله بن محمد الدويش الطبعة الأولى 1407 هـ مكتبة دار العليان.
18) كما يوجد مجموعة من المقالات ترد على سيد قطب خرجت بعنوان لا تسبوا أصحابي ردود العلامة محمود شاكر ومعاصريه على سيد قطب جمعها وقدمها ورتبها ووثق نصوصها محمد بن عوض بن عبد الغني المصري الطبعة الأولى 1431 هـ دار سبيل المؤمنين.
19) الإخوان المسلمون بين الابتد…
ولم يقف الأمر عند التحذير النظري، فقد رد العلماء والمشايخ وطلاب العلم على داعش، وبيّنوا فساد منهجها، وحذّروا من التكفير والغلو والخروج واستحلال الدماء.
ومن العلماء الذين واجهوا هذا الفكر علماء من أحفاد الشيخ محمد بن عبد الوهاب رحمه الله، كما رد علماء الدعوة السلفية على جماعات الغلو والتكفير بمختلف صورها، كتنظيم القاعدة، والقطبيين، والإخوان المسلمين، والسرورية، وغيرها من الجماعات التي خالفت منهج أهل السنة في مسائل الغ…
📌 جديد المقالات
﷽
🔸 حين يُلبس الخوارج ثوب السلفية نقض فرية داعش نبتة سلفية 🔸
الحمد لله الذي أكمل لنا الدين، وأتم علينا نعمته، ورضي لنا الإسلام دينًا، وأمرنا باتباع سبيل المؤمنين، وجعل خير الهدي هدي محمد صلى الله عليه وسلم، وخير القرون قرنه ثم الذين يلونهم ثم الذين يلونهم، وحذّر من البدع والأهواء، والغلو والتنطع، وسلوك سبيل الخوارج والمفسدين.
أما بعد:
فمن أعظم ما ابتُليت به الأمة في هذا العصر اختلاط الحق بالباطل، وقلب…
فلتعلم، أخي المسلم، أن بلاد الجزائر مستهدفة من قبل دول وجماعات خطيرة، وأعلم أن الوعي بمخططات أعداء البلاد أمرٌ لا ينبغي الاستهانة به.
وهذا الفيديو، بما يتضمنه من معطيات ومشاهد (رسم خريطة الجزائر بالنيران)، يدل على أن هناك من يتربص بأمن البلاد واستقرارها ،مما يستوجب من المسلم اليقظة والحذر، ومعرفة ما يُحاك حول بلده، والوقوف صفًّا واحدًا في وجه كل من يريد بالجزائر وأهلها سوءًا.
نسأل الله أن يحفظ الجزائر وأهلها، وأن ي…
📌 تنبيه هام
نُنبّه الإخوة والأخوات المشاركين في الدورة إلى أن:
🔹 الاختبار الإلكتروني الخاص بشرح المتن سيكون يوم الثلاثاء المقبل إن شاء الله.
🔹 أما اختبار المتن فسيكون يوم الأحد بإذن الله.
⏳ ويستمر كلا الاختبارين إلى غاية يوم الخميس.
نسأل الله للجميع التوفيق والسداد، وأن ينفعنا بما تعلّمنا.
التشجير الأول لمتن نخبة الفكر للحافظ ابن حجر رحمه الله تعالى
سأبدأ في نشر تشجيرات وضعتها أنا لبعض المتون ... نسأل الله التوفيق
➢ https://t.me/deklsofwrk
💯5
Showing the 12 most recent of 171 posts we hold for @sfsmo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
أحمد عبد المنعم @ahmed19871111 · 28,550 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 9 September 2026
أهـلُ الـتـوحـيـد @altawheed1l · 23,522 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 18 September 2026
إذاعة طلاب العلم الشرعي @Ida3t_taleb_al3elme · 53,699 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 24 August 2026
المجالس القرآنية @majals_quran · 28,791 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 12 September 2026
قناة تليجرام / الروض السلفية @Rawdatan · 42,156 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 29 August 2026
بوابة طالب العلم @bawbttalib · 34,730 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 2 September 2026
مكتبة طالب العلم @eilm12 · 35,243 Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 4 September 2026
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“المنهج السلفي بالجزائر” (@sfsmo), 7,813 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sfsmo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
