Wanti Namaaf tasuma ykn Abadan namaaf hin qoonne maali? Ija Cybersecurity qofaan ilaalaa! 🔐 ከሳይበር ደህንነት (Cybersecurity) አንፃር ሲታይ፣ ማንኛውም ሰው ፈጽሞ ለሌላ ሰው ማጋራት የማይገባው ምንድነው? https://t.me/Aware2Secure
👍5

Channel
@shaafiimuhammad99
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
20,628subscribers
+339 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001172145492 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @shaafiimuhammad99 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 28 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/shaafiimuhammad99 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Sept 2026, 21:59 | 20,628 | +14 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:44 | 20,614 | +5 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 03:43 | 20,609 | +11 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 03:55 | 20,598 | +15 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 01:27 | 20,583 | +3 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 23:34 | 20,580 | +3 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 02:11 | 20,577 | +6 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 02:43 | 20,571 | +20 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 05:04 | 20,551 | +5 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 06:13 | 20,546 | +22 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 02:54 | 20,524 | +16 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 18:16 | 20,508 | +5 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 05:26 | 20,503 | +16 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 18:54 | 20,487 | +18 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 18:24 | 20,469 | +11 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 20:47 | 20,458 | +9 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 20:09 | 20,449 | +21 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 17:06 | 20,428 | +9 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 01:24 | 20,419 | +28 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 18:06 | 20,391 | first reading |
41 posts held, back to 28 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 57 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 41 (28 May 2026 – 2 September 2026) |
| Views total | 61,252 |
| Reactions total | 820 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 00:13 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
3,124 reactions across 41 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,759 | 56.3% | |
| 👍 | 879 | 28.1% | |
| 🥰 | 424 | 13.6% | |
| 👏 | 25 | 0.8% | |
| 🤩 | 19 | 0.608% | |
| 🎉 | 11 | 0.352% | |
| 🤔 | 6 | 0.192% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 0.032% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 41 of the 41 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,124 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 41 most recent posts we hold, published 28 May 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @shaafiimuhammad99. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 41 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 May 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Wanti Namaaf tasuma ykn Abadan namaaf hin qoonne maali? Ija Cybersecurity qofaan ilaalaa! 🔐 ከሳይበር ደህንነት (Cybersecurity) አንፃር ሲታይ፣ ማንኛውም ሰው ፈጽሞ ለሌላ ሰው ማጋራት የማይገባው ምንድነው? https://t.me/Aware2Secure
👍5
Hacked? If your Telegram account has been hacked, you must log in with your phone number, terminate all unknown active sessions, and turn on two-step verification immediately. Steps to Recover a Hacked Account 1 Log in via SMS: Open the Telegram app, enter your phone number, and type the login code sent via text message. 2 Terminate active sessions: Go to Settings, select Devices (or Active Sessions), and click Term…
❤14🥰1
Akkamitti Two-Step Verification (2FA) irra godhanna? Imeelii (Gmail, Outlook, Yahoo fi kkf) 1.Gara akkaawuntii imeelii keetii seeni. 2.Settings → Security fili. 3.Two-Step Verification ykn Two-Factor Authentication bani. 4.Lakkoofsa bilbilaa ykn appii authenticator dabaladhu. 5.Mirkaneessii fi hojii irra oolchi. Facebook 1.Menu → Settings & Privacy → Settings bani. 2.Password and Security fili. 3.Two-Factor Authent…
👍13❤7🥰2
🔐 Two-Step Verification jechuun tarkaanfii nageenyaa baay’ee barbaachisaa ta’e keessaa tokko yoo ta’u, akkaawuntiiwwan keessan kan akka Telegram, WhatsApp, Facebook, X (Twitter), TikTok, Signal fi platformoota biroo irratti namoonni hayyama hin qabne akka hin seenne ni eega. Two-Step Verification is a critical security measure that helps protect your online accounts, such as Telegram, WhatsApp, Facebook, X (Twitter)…
❤15🥰4👍1💯1
«أنتَ أحفظُ منّا.. وأنتَ أفقهُ منّا!» | أدب الكبار بين ابن عثيمين وابن جبرين رحمهما الله
❤20🥰7
Awarene2Secure #1 Did you know? Enabling Two-Step Verification is one of the easiest and most effective ways to secure your accounts. From Telegram and WhatsApp to Facebook, X (Twitter), TikTok, and Signal, this extra layer of protection can help keep your personal information safe from cybercriminals. 🔐 Beektuu? Two-Step Verification (Mirkaneessa Sadarkaa Lammaffaa) hojii irra oolchuun karaalee salphaa fi bu'a qa…
❤19
۞« Al-ikhlaas Al-ikhlaas »۞ « Wanti sodaatamu hedduullee taatu irra sodaatamtuun wanti nuti ofirraa sodaachuun akkaan barbaachisuu; wanti nuti sooshaal miidiyaa irratti facaasnu kan rabbiif ﷻ hin qulqulleeyfamin tan fuulli isaa qofti ittiin hin barbaadamin ta'uudha. Ammallee wanti nuti facaasnu osoo shari'aa fii safuu hawaasaa kan faalleeysitullee taatee wanti nuti namootaaf dhiheessinu sun kan fedhii fii dhandhama…
❤27👍21
ai dhimma gaaffiilee dhimmoot islaamaatiin wal qabatu keessatti chatgpt fii kanneen birootillee caalu. Dhihoo tana obboleessi kun abbaan Tarteel kun hojjetee hojiirra oolche hanga ammaa freedha. Hedduu ajaa'iba. Chatgpt faarraa waan adda isa godhu hedduu qaba. Xullaaboonni ilmii fii beektoonni islaamaa app isaa play store yookiin app store irraa buufatanii laaluu dandeessan... deebii if biraa hin uumu akak chatgpt.…
❤20👍3
Photo, posted without a caption
👍32❤15👏5
Namoonni silaa sababa eegumsaa,barakhaa fii kheeyrii zikriilee ganamaa fii galgalaa kheeysa jirtu beekhanii; akka maqaa isaanii haffazanitti zikriilee ganamaa fii galgalaa haffazu turan. 𝖘𝖚'𝖚𝖚𝖉 𝖎𝖇𝖓 𝖐𝖍𝖆𝖆𝖑𝖎𝖉 𝔷𝔦𝔨𝔯𝔦𝔦𝔩𝔢𝔢 𝔤𝔞𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔞 𝔣𝔦𝔦 𝔤𝔞𝔩𝔤𝔞𝔩𝔞𝔞 𝔦𝔯𝔯𝔞𝔱𝔱𝔦 𝔞𝔨𝔨𝔞𝔞𝔫 𝔞𝔨𝔨𝔞𝔞𝔫 𝔞𝔨𝔨𝔞 𝔪𝔞𝔩𝔢𝔢 𝔥𝔞𝔞 𝔢𝔢𝔤𝔤𝔞𝔫𝔫𝔲𝔲
❤33👍7🥰1
Photo, posted without a caption
👍25🥰7
- الإمام العلامة حمد بن عبدالعزيز العوسجي البدراني الدوسري -رحمه الله- (ت1330ه/1911م). - الإمام العلامة صالح بن سالم البنيان -رحمه الله- (ت1330ه/1912م). - الإمام العلامة محمد بن إبراهيم ابن محمود -رحمه الله- (ت1333ه/1914م). - الإمام العلامة إبراهيم بن عبدالملك بن حسين بن الشيخ محمد بن عبدالوهاب -رحمه الله- (ت1336ه/1917م). - الإمام العلامة عبدالله بن عبداللطيف بن عبدالرحمن بن حسن بن الشيخ محمد بن عبدالوهاب -رحمه ا…
👍2❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 41 posts we hold for @shaafiimuhammad99. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Shaafii Muhammad Channel” (@shaafiimuhammad99), 20,628 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shaafiimuhammad99.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.