Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Роман Шалимов

Channel

Роман Шалимов

@shalimovnotes

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,456subscribers

-160 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001647283501
TypeChannel
Username@shalimovnotes
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 October 2026
Measurements held19
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/shalimovnotes

Topic

Film & TV — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

8,4568,6168,53613 August 2026 — 8,616 subscribers13 August 2026 — 8,615 subscribers16 August 2026 — 8,613 subscribers19 August 2026 — 8,611 subscribers26 August 2026 — 8,591 subscribers29 August 2026 — 8,582 subscribers1 September 2026 — 8,571 subscribers4 September 2026 — 8,563 subscribers9 September 2026 — 8,531 subscribers13 September 2026 — 8,514 subscribers17 September 2026 — 8,509 subscribers26 September 2026 — 8,499 subscribers5 October 2026 — 8,491 subscribers11 October 2026 — 8,480 subscribers14 October 2026 — 8,477 subscribers17 October 2026 — 8,471 subscribers20 October 2026 — 8,469 subscribers23 October 2026 — 8,462 subscribers26 October 2026 — 8,456 subscribers13 August 202626 October 2026
19 measurements spanning 74 days, net -160. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,432–8,640 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Oct 2026, 11:288,456-6
23 Oct 2026, 03:278,462-7
20 Oct 2026, 07:278,469-2
17 Oct 2026, 10:408,471-6
14 Oct 2026, 12:168,477-3
11 Oct 2026, 06:018,480-11
5 Oct 2026, 02:208,491-8
26 Sept 2026, 07:598,499-10
17 Sept 2026, 09:198,509-5
13 Sept 2026, 11:568,514-17
9 Sept 2026, 13:218,531-32
4 Sept 2026, 03:388,563-8
1 Sept 2026, 03:458,571-11
29 Aug 2026, 07:268,582-9
26 Aug 2026, 14:238,591-20
19 Aug 2026, 18:548,611-2
16 Aug 2026, 22:258,613-2
13 Aug 2026, 13:298,615-1
13 Aug 2026, 08:018,616first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 9 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
8s
Average length
8s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,326 reactions across 12 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤39329.6%
❤‍🔥35426.7%
🔥33325.1%
👏916.86%
✍846.33%
🤝574.30%
😁141.06%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,326 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 27 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
18
across the posts below
Posts paid on
8
of 12 we hold a reading for · 67%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @shalimovnotes. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 July 2026 to 27 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

27 Aug 2026, 16:32 UTC523 views70 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

Because it’s so much fun, Jan! Есть великолепное старое интервью Тарантино. Там журналистка долго пытается выяснить, зачем в «Убить Билла» столько крови и насилия. Тарантино что-то пытается объяснить про жанр и что насилие в кино и жизни это разные вещи, но она продолжает давить: ну зачем столько крови? И старина Квентин выдаёт: Because it’s so much fun, Jan! Я обожаю фразу. Она как баннер появляется у меня в г…

👏26😁14❤12✍11🔥4🤝3

23 Aug 2026, 16:16 UTC≈1,050 views77 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Идее достаточно пальца Я часто ставлю ТЗ голосовым сообщением, парой кривых линий или рисунком, будто его делали во время лёгкого инсульта. Потому что если идея есть – её ядро помещается в одно сообщение. «Первый номер журнала Plife будет о кино, которое можно не просто посмотреть, а унести в жизнь». Всё. Уже видно понятна главная идея и плюс-минус ясно, как из неё будут вырастать рубрики, иллюстрации, видео и ст…

❤41🔥23✍11❤‍🔥2

20 Aug 2026, 16:53 UTC≈1,280 views108 reactions2 Starsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Сначала посмотри, чему они аплодируют Недавно услышал в «Рике и Морти» великолепную фразу: Your boos mean nothing, I’ve seen what makes you cheer. В переводе как-то так: «Ваше буканье ничего не значит. Я видел, чему вы аплодируете». Если вдуматься, то она прекрасно лечит страх чужого мнения. Какая к чёртовой бабушке разница, что думает о фильме «Одиссея» Кристофера Нолана человек, которому понравился «Колобок»? …

❤‍🔥59🔥19✍17❤13

12 Aug 2026, 12:08 UTC≈1,800 views99 reactions2 Starsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Не ищи вдохновение Сделай что-нибудь настолько странное, чтобы вдохновение само пришло посмотреть. Горькая конфета в том, что всё изменить можно сразу. За минуту. Прямо сейчас придумать идею, которая поменяет ход вещей. Приведёт клиентов в дело, даст лифт в новую должность или даже полностью сменит фильм с переездом в новый город. Её не нужно вымучивать. Чаще на неё не нужны огромные деньги, можно даже обойтись б…

❤53🔥27✍12👏4❤‍🔥3

10 Aug 2026, 16:11 UTC≈1,300 views93 reactions1 Starread 22 August 2026
Photo

Если существование бессмысленно, то выбери бессмыслицу, которая тебе нравится.

🔥57✍17❤11👏8

4 Aug 2026, 14:32 UTC≈1,950 views131 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

Кладите больше заварки Терпеть не могу слабозаваренный чай. Вроде бы воду вскипятили, пакетик поболтали, но в чашке, как говорил мой дед – ослиная моча. Лучше тогда вообще не начинать. Это как заниматься сексом в штанах. В жизни полно вещей, на которые мы тратим драгоценное время, деньги и энергию, но кладём недостаточно заварки, чтобы они обрели силу джедаев. Где вместо потенциала пистолетом получаем варёную сосис…

❤‍🔥60🔥39❤22👏9🤝1

2 Aug 2026, 14:25 UTC≈1,570 views48 reactions1 Starread 20 August 2026
Photo

Написал в Plife заметку редактора про трёх слепых мышей в жизни мужчины: женщин, деньги и признание. Про всё, чего хочу сам, но чему не собираюсь отдавать право определять свою жизнь. И тем более свою ценность. ТРИ СЛЕПЫЕ МЫШИ

❤17❤‍🔥16🔥13👏2

28 Jul 2026, 18:32 UTC≈1,830 views89 reactions1 Starread 20 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥34❤24🤝16🔥11✍4

28 Jul 2026, 17:16 UTC≈1,680 views139 reactions3 Starsread 20 August 2026
Video

Большие надежды Низкие ожидания Наверное, это самая сильная формула, на мой взгляд. Не бояться смотреть выше и хотеть большего, но ждать меньшего. Вся драма, которую мы сейчас наблюдаем в соцсетях – это высокие ожидания от жизни. Тысячи контрактов на несчастье. Где обесценивается настоящее, пока нет более упругой задницы, гигантской корзины цветов или отдыха в красивом отеле. Для меня сейчас самое важное – дело. И…

🔥74❤38👏21✍6

21 Jul 2026, 16:15 UTC≈2,180 views194 reactions5 Starsread 20 August 2026
Video

После понтов Со временем мне стало искренне наплевать на статус человека. Деньги, известность, должность, природная красота или лицо, которое собирали у лучших хирургов по индивидуальному проекту – всё это может быть интересно первые пять минут. Потом начинается человек. Ты слышишь глупости от миллиардеров и видишь их комплексы, торчащие наружу из дорогого пиджака, как плохо заправленная рубашка. Многие знаменитые…

❤100❤‍🔥45🤝27🔥15✍6👏1

14 Jul 2026, 11:08 UTC≈2,160 views88 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Ты оценишь это позже Вспомнилось одно из интервью Тома Форда, в котором он упоминал об ужине с Карлом Лагерфельдом. Том тогда работал в Gucci креативным директором. И он сказал Карлу о том, что устал от всего происходящего в его жизни и больше этого не ценит: показы, коллекции, перелёты, постоянное движение. Дословно не помню, но смысл такой. И Карл ему ответил: ты оценишь это позже. Тогда я остановил интервью и …

❤‍🔥39❤26👏20🔥3

9 Jul 2026, 11:05 UTC≈2,710 views190 reactions3 Starsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Почему я не писал? Во-первых, я присоединился к Бременским музыкантам, гулял и напевал: «Нам любые дороги дороооги, ла-ла-ла-лалала». Но главное – мне стало тесно в старой роли. После креативного агентства, банка и разговоров про бренд, я постепенно надел рубашку эксперта. А кто со мной уже давно, знает: я сам не очень люблю экспертов. Мне ближе люди, которые чего-то не знают, пробуют, ошибаются и делают странные в…

❤‍🔥96🔥48❤36🤝10

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @shalimovnotes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Руслан.txt
@ruslantxt · 37,230
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 1 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Роман Шалимов” (@shalimovnotes), 8,456 subscribers as measured 26 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shalimovnotes.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.