Вокруг столько ненужного, полуавтоматического бессодержательного и безрадостного «контента» от людей, которые и не хотят, и не умеют, не рождены его производить, что хочется оказать услугу человечеству и громко помолчать.
🕊8❤🔥4👀4🖕3

Channel
@shamilvaleev
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
329subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001740563632 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @shamilvaleev |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 4 times, most recently 3 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/shamilvaleev |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:55 | 329 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:18 | 328 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:11 | 328 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 26 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
111 reactions across 15 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤🔥 | 59 | 53.2% | |
| 🕊 | 17 | 15.3% | |
| 👀 | 14 | 12.6% | |
| 🙊 | 5 | 4.50% | |
| 💩 | 3 | 2.70% | |
| 🖕 | 3 | 2.70% | |
| 😐 | 3 | 2.70% | |
| 🤡 | 3 | 2.70% | |
| 🥴 | 3 | 2.70% | |
| 🥱 | 1 | 0.901% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 111 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 26 March 2026 to 6 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Вокруг столько ненужного, полуавтоматического бессодержательного и безрадостного «контента» от людей, которые и не хотят, и не умеют, не рождены его производить, что хочется оказать услугу человечеству и громко помолчать.
🕊8❤🔥4👀4🖕3
Эмодисциплина и психответственность. В переходное между культивируемым крайним индивидуализмом и неоколлективизмом интровертов время хочется сформулировать закон или хотябы правило ответственности за свои проявления в обществе или диалоге. Допустим, ты уникальная личность, разрываемая страстями, МДП*, ОКР** и прочими качелями. Разумеется, в рамках, пока по эту сторону пограничной нормы. Кроме того, ты осознанная, …
❤🔥6
Posted without readable text
🥱1
Что такое муштабель?
The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Posted without readable text
🕊3
Думаю, после наступления царства ИИ понадобятся специалисты, которые помнят, как все было на самом деле, могут отличить правду от усредненной технотронной галлюцинации. Кроме омерзительного закадрового голоса и инопланетного дизель-панк-освещения пейзажей, те, кто генерит с помощью ментальных роботов, прокалываются на исторических и этноодеждах, которые выведены как среднее арифметическое, смешанное и вновь хаотично…
❤🔥4🙊3🤡2😐1
Этот прозрачный сосуд для чая — один из немногих артефактов истории нашего рода. Семейная реликвия наряду с капка тобе ташем, камнем при воротах. Ему больше ста пятнадцати лет, это сувенир из будущей Саудовской Аравии моего прадеда Абдуллы (Габдуллы) хаджи Багаутдинова для супруги Фатимы, дочери Ибрагима из Аблаево. История такова — выросший в небогатой семье, продолжатель династии мещерякских указных мулл Абдулла,…
❤🔥6🕊1
Таш Это — камень, который стоит у ворот деревенского дома в Старокалмашево сколько себя помню. Сейчас, с моего роста, он кажется небольшим, но я хорошо помню, как на него приходилось взбираться, а потом сидеть, болтая ногами («не сиди на холодном камне!»), обутыми в сандалии, случалось и обдирать об него колени, которые быстро заживали, не то, что сейчас. Можно было часами стоять у него, наблюдвя за жизнью мелких …
❤🔥13🕊4
Posted without readable text
🥴3😐2
Редкий случай — вчера отказался от комментария, не ответил на вопрос, заданный коллегой-журналистом по общественно-политической теме. Насчет инорэпера. Обычно я комментирую почти всё и почти всем (кроме явных «боевых листков» и недосми, или сми, которым я не доверяю в силу опыта взаимодействия). Есть ещё несколько журналистов, вернее, работников отрасли медиа, с которыми на одном гектаре не хотел бы находиться или …
❤🔥10
Posted without readable text
Posted without readable text
👀6
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @shamilvaleev. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Что такое муштабель?
The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Какая из этих фраз, произнесённая малознакомым человеком, звучит для Вас наиболее грубо и бестактно? (Неск)
The shares total 124%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 26 March 2026 to 6 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Шамиль «Шома» Валеев” (@shamilvaleev), 329 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shamilvaleev.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.