Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 十二的小花园

Channel

十二的小花园

@shierainiyo

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,484subscribers

+156 since we began measuring on 31 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003268511789
TypeChannel
Username@shierainiyo
CreatedBetween 1 October 2025 and 10 December 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded31 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/shierainiyo

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,3281,4841,40631 August 2026 — 1,328 subscribers31 August 2026 — 1,328 subscribers31 August 2026 — 1,330 subscribers4 September 2026 — 1,402 subscribers9 September 2026 — 1,424 subscribers13 September 2026 — 1,450 subscribers17 September 2026 — 1,484 subscribers31 August 202617 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 16 days, net +156. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,305–1,507 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 02:581,484+34
13 Sept 2026, 01:371,450+26
9 Sept 2026, 05:361,424+22
4 Sept 2026, 01:171,402+72
31 Aug 2026, 20:141,330+2
31 Aug 2026, 17:151,328no change
31 Aug 2026, 17:011,328first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 10 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
46.9%
avg views ÷ 1,484 subscribers
Avg views / post
696
1 post measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 August 2026
Posts held19 (10 December 202527 August 2026)
Views total696
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken31 Aug 2026, 17:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
57s
Average length
29s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

27 reactions across 10 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1866.7%
😍518.5%
😢27.41%
🌭13.70%
🍌13.70%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 27 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 10 December 2025 to 27 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Jul 2026, 10:57 UTC≈2,750 views3 reactionsread 31 August 2026

以后桩15分钟以上的换手打,钱不退!太长太粗的不接了(到了也不接)这两天跑医院又痛又累😭1号还要去复查😭😭😭

2🍌1

28 Jul 2026, 06:20 UTC≈2,940 views2 reactionsread 31 August 2026

等会去医院了 这两天都休息😭

😢2

26 Jul 2026, 06:35 UTC≈3,270 viewsread 31 August 2026

哥哥们 我身体不舒服要去医院 真扛不住很抱歉 定了的只能改天了😭

26 Jul 2026, 04:45 UTC≈3,150 views1 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Forwarded from @SZZZJreport

苏州硬了么报告模板: ---【💕基础信息】--- 时间:2026-07-25 老师:#十二 留名:zzzzz ---【👙整体形象】--- 人照差别:9 身材比例:9 气质魅力:9 ---【👧🏻服务质量】--- 服务水平:8 配合态度:9 舒适度:9 整场综合评分:8.83 ---【📝服务详情】--- 【过程描述】:课室好找,新小区车位很多安全。进门后老师主动递水,课室干净敞亮,闲聊之后进入正题,老师没有陪浴服务。嫩妹服务少但不敷衍,口的很舒服还有69,重点要说的是老师的身材,腰细🐻大,要是穿上低胸私服简直了。不愧是年轻妹妹水就是多,反馈也很好,123直接出货。 【优点】:嫩,细支硕果,态度好脾气好 【建议/缺点】:无 【个人评价总结】:强烈推荐 ❤️ 硬了么群友审美各不同,吾之蜜糖,彼之砒霜。不合适直接掉头 ✳️Powered by @SuZhoulang

1

25 Jul 2026, 14:57 UTC≈2,490 views2 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Forwarded from @SZZZJreportPhoto

苏州硬了么报告模板: ---【💕基础信息】--- 时间:2026-07-25 老师:#十二 留名:阿七李 ---【👙整体形象】--- 人照差别:9 身材比例:9 气质魅力:9 ---【👧🏻服务质量】--- 服务水平:8 配合态度:9.5 舒适度:9.5 整场综合评分:9 ---【📝服务详情】--- 【过程描述】:关注十二好久了,是我喜欢的巨乳萝莉,看到老师上课了就约上了,开门就惊艳了完美的身材,美丽的脸蛋,嫩到出水。没有犹豫付费上课,看了手机确认是自己聊天的没有其他登录设备,课表没有陪浴自己洗干净后开始服务:我先抱着老师吃上了巨乳,白白嫩嫩软软的吃了个饱,乳头粉色的。然后躺着换老师舔我的乳头,接着吃我的大雕,接着69(看着很嫩但是樱唇不是粉粉的有点黑没下去嘴)邦邦硬后戴套女上,巨乳动如脱兔上下一跳一跳,换后入腰臀比绝了把老师干爽了叫个不停,接着老汉推车没找到洞洞,尴尬,第一次碰到硬度够进不去的情况,试了几次还是进不去就有点软了老

2

25 Jul 2026, 13:10 UTC≈2,040 views2 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Video

祝我梦到一个有你的梦🥰🥰🥰

2

23 Jul 2026, 11:29 UTC≈2,390 views1 reactionsread 31 August 2026

我是打酱油的所以每天很佛系🙈🙈🙈

1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @shierainiyo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“十二的小花园” (@shierainiyo), 1,484 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shierainiyo.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.