Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for SHIZOTON

Channel

SHIZOTON

@shizoton

2 usernames

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

16,021subscribers

-576 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002128780426
TypeChannel
Usernames@nftshiza @shizoton
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held63
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/shizoton

Topic

Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

16,02116,59716,3096 August 202618 September 2026
63 measurements spanning 44 days, net -576. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,935–16,683 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 63
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 16:5816,021-9
18 Sept 2026, 06:0216,030-25
16 Sept 2026, 05:5816,055no change
16 Sept 2026, 02:5616,055-18
14 Sept 2026, 14:0116,073-4
14 Sept 2026, 09:0016,077-8
13 Sept 2026, 03:1916,085-3
12 Sept 2026, 16:0016,088-13
11 Sept 2026, 07:3916,101-21
10 Sept 2026, 12:0116,122-36
8 Sept 2026, 10:5916,158-11
7 Sept 2026, 08:5516,169-15
5 Sept 2026, 06:3816,184-10
3 Sept 2026, 09:3216,194+2
2 Sept 2026, 21:4516,192-7
2 Sept 2026, 06:1816,199-23
1 Sept 2026, 19:2516,222-14
1 Sept 2026, 03:2816,236-1
31 Aug 2026, 18:2616,237-9
31 Aug 2026, 02:5316,246first reading

Engagement

36 posts held, back to 11 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.946%
avg views ÷ 16,021 subscribers
Avg views / post
152
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.42%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 36 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held36 (11 July 20263 September 2026)
Views total1,667
Reactions total107
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 10:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 41s
Average length
27s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

482 reactions across 36 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁16033.2%
❤‍🔥11924.7%
🤣7716.0%
326.64%
💯326.64%
👍214.36%
🔥122.49%
🤔91.87%
😭51.04%
😍30.622%
😱30.622%
🤯30.622%
🙏20.415%
10.207%
🎉10.207%
👀10.207%
💔10.207%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 36 of the 36 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 482 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 36 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
9
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 36 we hold a reading for · 17%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @shizoton. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 36 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 11 July 2026 to 3 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

3 Sept 2026, 08:11 UTC69 views9 reactionsread 3 September 2026

подозрительно мало Шуфутинского сегодня неужели мем про 3 сентября наконец-то официально всех заебал? мы как общество всё-таки способны развиваться 👍

❤‍🔥5💯2👍1🤔1

Signed Sega

1 Sept 2026, 15:21 UTC134 views11 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

ВСЕХ ШКОЛЬНИКОВ С ПРАЗДНИКОМ! пусть все двойки в этом году будут только по математике 🙃 @shizoton

😁5🤣4❤‍🔥2

Signed Sega

31 Aug 2026, 18:26 UTC163 views11 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁7❤‍🔥4

Signed Sega

31 Aug 2026, 18:19 UTC166 views7 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

пропала галочка #бывает@shizoton

❤‍🔥4😁3

Signed Sega

31 Aug 2026, 18:00 UTC135 views8 reactionsread 3 September 2026

ТЕМ ВРЕМЕНЕМ, GRAM WALLET ПОТИХОНЬКУ ПОЕХАЛ у некоторых пользователей он уже появился в Telegram, дальше обещают постепенно раскатывать на всех у меня от нового кошелька пока одно требование: ОТДАЙТЕ МОИ ГРАМУСЫ 230 штук сидят взаперти 😢

❤‍🔥42😁2

Signed Sega

31 Aug 2026, 18:00 UTC55 views3 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

🏳️ Gram Wallet in Telegram is ready and is now accessible to a select group of users. 🤩 We'll be gradually rolling it out to our billion+ users over the next couple of weeks. ⚡️ Thanks to the validators who approved the smart contract that powers it, future upgrades of the wallet won't require painful migrations. This is just one of the innovations we've built to make non-custodial wallets usable ✨

❤‍🔥3

Signed Sega

31 Aug 2026, 17:35 UTC153 views9 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

всех школяров с началом учебного года! 💪👍🤝 @shizoton

😁4❤‍🔥2👍2💯1

Signed Sega

30 Aug 2026, 20:53 UTC187 views12 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

хейтиры будут посрамлены! #кринж@shizoton

😁5❤‍🔥4🔥3

Signed Sega

30 Aug 2026, 19:29 UTC188 views16 reactionsread 3 September 2026

небольшое разоблачение это моё реальное изображение простите, что выгляжу слишком ахуенно

😁9❤‍🔥43

Signed Sega

30 Aug 2026, 19:19 UTC188 views15 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

вы готовы купить курс у этого человека??? я долго не хотел выходить в инфобиз, но больше не могу скрывать знания на курсе расскажу: как получать бесплатные деньги как не фиксировать прибыль как усреднять до последнего и как потом объяснить всё это словом «опыт» стоимость курса — всего 30 GRAM первые 10 учеников получат дополнительный модуль «как сделать скриншот вместо фиксации»

😁8❤‍🔥3🤣31

Signed Sega

27 Aug 2026, 19:30 UTC229 views6 reactions1 Starread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @thedailytonrus

🍌 Что ещё известно о новом tg-wallet-contract: ⚫️ В экспериментальной ветке тестируется возможность хранить в контракте Telegram ID владельца. Скорее всего, его могут использовать для восстановления доступа к кошельку или 2FA, но пока этой функциональности нет. ⚫️ В основной сети TON началось голосование за добавление кода Telegram Wallet в конфигурацию блокчейна под параметром -123. Именно оттуда кошельки будут з

❤‍🔥41😍1

Signed Sega

21 Aug 2026, 06:55 UTC385 views17 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

GM! сегодня утром GRAM ВЗЛЕТЕЛ 🚀 ПОДСКОЧИЛ ВЗМЫЛ ВВЫСЬ аж до $1.48 😐

❤‍🔥8😁5👍4

Signed Sega

Showing the 12 most recent of 36 posts we hold for @shizoton. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Frendly - Новости
@frendly_news · 36,429
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 1 September 2026
Primate impact is too high
@primateimpact · 77,071
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 19 August 2026
TEC
@tecteam · 47,592
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 26 August 2026
Wutmu о TON
@WutmuTon · 123,833
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 13 August 2026
Pixel NEWS
@pixeltemple · 66,488
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 20 August 2026
Diamond Bazar
@tgbtc · 253,538
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 18 August 2026
De-Side Crypto
@DeSideCrypto · 41,265
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 29 August 2026
Crypto Oborona
@crypto_oborona · 127,839
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 13 August 2026
Vibes
@saintvibes · 49,686
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 24 August 2026
Болтоши Болтомото
@boltoshi · 51,239
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 24 August 2026
Full Metal Jetton
@full_metal_jetton · 42,823
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 28 August 2026
Nemoneta.COM 🍿
@ne_moneta_com · 40,428
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 29 August 2026
Fakhruz
@FakhruzTon · 22,291
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 21 September 2026
Lozovsky.ton
@georgelozovsky · 105,900
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 14 August 2026
TON by @korova
@tonkorova · 32,716
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 4 September 2026

This channel appears in 15 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“SHIZOTON” (@shizoton), 16,021 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shizoton.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.